Zack Duke has pitched well, but sucks because the Pirates lose when he pitches, but he has had some bad luck, but sucks in close games, and what is this guy saying?
What is the thesis of this argument. At first I thought it was an argument that wins are a worthless stat, but no, it is Duke has pitched well but has not helped the PIrates win, because he "hasn't done his best work in close games".... Who the fuck is this Matthew Pouliot, and has anybody given him an EEG to see if there are any brain functions?