Monday Quick Hits

- Minorleaguebaseball.com has a nice article up about the Reds system entitled "Help is on the way for the Reds". Always encouraging to read about the guys moving through the system.
- Joe Girardi is apparently the new Yankees manager. Kind of an odd choice given the Don Mattingly situation. I am a little hopeful that Steinbrenner's offspring are about to run the Yankees into the ground, but we will see I guess. Having that much money certainly increases their margin of error.
- Now that the Rockies have been swept we can expect tons of "OMG the AL roxxors" articles this offseason. Here's one, and here's another already.
- The biggest story this offseason will almost certainly be A-Rod. I don't have much of an opinion of the guy, but I did find it pretty ballsy that he announced he was opting out during the World Series. I also don't blame him a bit for leaving New York the way he's been treated by fans. And I wouldn't want to play for an owner this stupid either:
In an interview before Boras's announcement, Steinbrenner said he would try to impress on Rodriguez the value of winning titles and making his legacy as a Yankee. He related a story of talking to Joe DiMaggio, who told him his championships would not have been half as meaningful if he had won them for any other team.
"Does he want to go into the Hall of Fame as a Yankee," Steinbrenner said, "or a Toledo Mud Hen?"
- Nice little story here on David Nied, the first player taken by the Rockies in the 1992 expansion draft. That was a pretty crazy time. I can remember getting baseball cards that year and thinking it was pretty cool whenever I pulled a Marlin or Rockie.
- Ken Rosenthal thinks the Red Sox are the next dynasty. Professional sports are really a blast these days with the Red Sox and Patriots winning the World Series and Super Bowl just about every year.
0 recs |
64 comments
Comments
A few other sites have mentioned it
by Slyde on
Oct 29, 2007 4:52 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Girardi
I think the Yankees are going to be a mess for awhile. The politics have always been toxic, but now, with Steinbrenner suffering from dementia, Torre out, Cashman weakened, and Swindal ousted, the daggers will be drawn.
And I have serious doubts about Girardi's ability to handle it. He couldn't deal with the much milder politics in Florida. They're going to eat him alive in NY if he pulls the same crap he did with the Marlins.
by BubbaFan on
Oct 29, 2007 5:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mattingly didn't want to be
As for the AL superiority, where were those guys in 2006?
The DH also gives the AL a decided advantage. An AL team essentially fields a team with nine starting hitters rather than eight. Even in NL parks, a starting DH-caliber player as your first guy off the bench trumps the first pinch-hitter virtually any NL team can throw out there. I detest the DH, but if it's not going away, then it needs to be mandatory for both leagues if fairness is to come into play.
by Thundering Turtle on
Oct 29, 2007 5:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
hear hear.
hear here?
by andromache on
Oct 29, 2007 5:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My wife and I have debated this
by Slyde on
Oct 29, 2007 5:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I finally decided to look it up
by Slyde on
Oct 29, 2007 5:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yankees drive AL superiority
The Yankees started it, but those two spend like there's no tomorrow, so to just try and compete, teams like the Angels and Blue Jays have to up their payroll and sign bigger name free agents. There aren't any teams like that in the NL, so payrolls don't have to be as high, and the teams can rely more on rookies and arbitration eligible players.
It's no fluke that the AL Wild Card team has been either the Yankees or the Red Sox four out of the last five years, and eight out of fourteen since they started the format in 1994. That's also the time since the AL started winning virtually every All-Star game. Right now, even the big money NL clubs are spending only enough to make the playoffs, not to compete directly with the Yankees or Red Sox. Until that changes, the AL will continue to dominate everything.
by Watubi on
Oct 29, 2007 5:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Steinbrenner's quote is really annoying.
That whole quote really exemplifies the reason why I have started to not be able to stand the greater part of yankees and redsox fans. Even the ones I mostly like are always saying things like "Oh look how quirky this player/quote is! This is why I love the redsox!"
Because, obviously, no other team can compare in originality or quirkiness, or fun-loving. You may think I'm overreacting, but seriously, I've heard things like "But there's no way FreeAgentPlayerX would ever want to leave suchandsuch team, right? I mean, wouldn't playing anywhere else just suck now?"
FYI, yes, FreeAgentPlayerX is Mike Lowell...
by andromache on
Oct 29, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think it's a sly dig
by BubbaFan on
Oct 29, 2007 5:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
please expound
thanks in advance,
boobs
by boobs on
Oct 29, 2007 6:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
if I'm not mistaken
by bobestes on
Oct 29, 2007 6:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Steinbrenner
It's not that reporters have stopped talking to George. It's that Yankees usually protect him from the press these days. He doesn't even come to games very often, and when he does, he rarely talks to the press. (And when he does, it's often strange. Like when he called A-Rod "the third baseman." Some saw that as disrespect, but I think the truth is, he didn't remember A-Rod's name.)
That recent interview was a fluke. A reporter called the Yankees office, and George picked up the phone. I guess he was having a good day, and was in the office. But it was definitely a fluke. Like calling the White House and having the president answer the phone.
That said, the Bergen County Record actually has pretty good Yankees coverage. And I'm not just saying that because they were big Bubba Crosby fans. ;-)
by BubbaFan on
Oct 29, 2007 7:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thank you madam
by boobs on
Oct 29, 2007 9:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
little Stein
"If you don't understand the magnitude of being a Yankee and understand what that means..."
"...we're going to give you the privilege of being a Yankee..."
Then the Mudhen line. This epitomizes the arrogance that comes with the Yankees. There are the Yankees and 29 AAA teams. Just when everyone starts equating the Sox with the Yanks and preparing to hate them just as much, the new head Steinbrenner reminds us all how bad the pinstripers really are.
Oh, and I'm definitely putting George on my Death Pool list next year.
by Red Menace on
Oct 29, 2007 7:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Along with Robert Goulet
by Slyde on
Oct 29, 2007 9:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we always had a ramones death pool.
by andromache on
Oct 29, 2007 11:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
damn
by Red Menace on
Oct 31, 2007 12:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To continue on my own personal rant.
"Was there ever a team in baseball that loved each other as much as these 2007 Red Sox do? "
This is a girl who blinks in confusion when I make sly jabs about the 1975 world series. And she's so ready to proclaim these Redsox the most lovingest team ever.
......
I hate the Red Sox for making me hate people I ordinarily like.
by andromache on
Oct 29, 2007 11:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Toledo Mud Hens

by BubbaFan on
Nov 2, 2007 12:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BubbaFan... help!
by TheC on
Oct 29, 2007 5:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
by BubbaFan on
Oct 29, 2007 5:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I used to date a Northwestern girl.
On another Yankees-related note, 1976 was a wonderful year, wasn't it?
by Thundering Turtle on
Oct 29, 2007 7:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Now that it's offical, it's official.
Sign ARod.
Love,
sidnancy.
by sidnancy on
Oct 29, 2007 6:01 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I second the motion
by Caleb on
Oct 29, 2007 6:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ARod
And he'd certainly never do so in Cincinnati, where the team would never be able to assemble the complementary parts to do so. We've been down this road before, but with the Texas Rangers.
by bobestes on
Oct 29, 2007 6:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
really?
by Caleb on
Oct 29, 2007 6:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen
by cggarb on
Oct 29, 2007 8:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well...
Or you could probably spread the money across the team in a way that would get you more production over the course of a season than from one player. Think of an index fund compared to stock in one company.
Shoot, you'd probably win more championships in the long run pouring that $30mil into scouting/latin america than you would ARod.
by bobestes on
Oct 29, 2007 9:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ARod's worth
And if you run an objective analysis of Rodriguez's tangible worth, it's incredibly difficult to justify paying him $30 million per season. In Baseball Between the Numbers (Basic Books, 2006), Nate Silver looked at the first five seasons of Rodriguez's contract, 2001-2005. His salary for those seasons was roughly $122 million. Using a generous model, A-Rod was worth $92 million. That is, if the Rangers and Yankees had spent that $122 million elsewhere and gotten just an average return on their money, they'd have won more games than they actually did.
The one thing Neyer leaves out is that the Yankees weren't actually paying all of ARod's contract, so they were probably getting close to proper value for him, using Silver's model.
Would ARod add a bunch of wins to this team? Absolutely. Would the Reds be a better team over the long-term? I don't know. It really depends on how successful the young players are because there isn't going to be a lot of money available to spend on the free agent market to fill any holes that pop up.
I agree that they are likely to be better off spending the same money on more players as it adds both flexibility in the payroll (especially if the money isn't guaranteed for 6 or 7 years) and gives the Reds the opportunity to fill more holes. Even if ARod were to come here and give the Reds 7 more wins over EdE or the shortstops, they'd still be 5 games below .500 and they wouldn't have any money left to play with (I'd assume). So is that $30M worth the difference between ARod and EdE?
by Slyde on
Oct 29, 2007 10:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BUT
/Boras
by Red Menace on
Oct 29, 2007 10:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's the problem
- There is only 1 ARod;
- There is a very finite supply of $10-12M players.
Second, if you say "OK, I'll just buy 2 $15M FAs instead", who is there? The rotting husk of Andruw Jones? The decline years of Torii Hunter? As good as they were last year, 36 year old catcher (which is 105 to you or me) Jorge Posada or 38 year old Mariano Rivera? And remember, 30 other teams are looking at that same, limited supply of players.
In my mind, there is only one team who shouldn't at least look at him - the Mets, and then only if he refuses to move from the left side of the infield. His offense transforms your team, it's that good.
Now there are some reality checks here. If you have to give him more than 5 years, I think you're taking a big chance. Unless Castellini treats him as a "special purchase", outside of the planned payroll, that contract would be pretty limiting. EdE will never be ARod, but is still young and can be solid for years to come (and lots cheaper).
Previous pronouncements aside, I think it would make more sense for the Reds to try to get Rivera and Posada. They fill specific holes on the team, being big names they show the team is actually trying, and as long as you can get them for 3 or fewer years are likely to be worth the money (or at least most of it).
But if he can still play SS, imagine how many runs the Reds would score with Hamilton/Jr (or Bruce)/ARod/Dunn/EdE/Votto in the meat of the lineup!
by sidnancy on
Oct 30, 2007 8:52 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with what you are spoutin
- ARod likes NY
- The Mets were his fav team as a kid
- David Wright says he will move positions
by jacob brumfield on
Oct 30, 2007 4:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heer, heer!
by Madville on
Oct 30, 2007 8:28 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
In his 4 years in NY, the Yankees were 2nd, 2nd, 1st and 1st in runs scored; they were 6th, 9th, 6th, and 7th in runs allowed. In his 3 years in Texas, they were 3rd, 5th and 5th in RS and 14th, 12th, and 14th in RA. This will be his second league MVP while in NY, to go with the one he won in Texas; in 5 of these 7 seasons, he was in the top 5 in OPS+ in the AL, and won 2 Gold Gloves in Texas.
Unless you think he needs work on his forkball, ARod wasn't the reason for the failure of either of these teams.
And he'd certainly never do so in Cincinnati, where the team would never be able to assemble the complementary parts to do so. We've been down this road before, but with the Texas Rangers.
In '01, the Rangers paid Andreas Galarraga $6M for 240 ABs at .734 OPS, Kenny Rogers $7.5M for 120 IP at 6.19 ERA, and Darrin Oliver $7M for 6 AB. In '02 they paid $6.8M for 200 league-average ABs from Rusty Greer, $8.7M for 375 league-average ABs from Carl Everett, $11M for 275 league-average ABs from Juan Gonzalez, and almost $7M for 140 IP and 5.75 ERA from Chan-Ho Park. In '03, it was mostly Park - $13M, <30 IP, 7.58 ERA. The money they paid ARod was not the problem with this team.
by sidnancy on
Oct 29, 2007 8:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
in other news it is strange the reds have pitching
by justin0070000 on
Oct 29, 2007 6:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks JD!
I had a brief thought that it might be cool to have ARod on the Reds, but your image choice corrected my silly thoughts.
by jacob brumfield on
Oct 30, 2007 4:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
other possibilities



by Red Menace on
Oct 30, 2007 5:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Goodbye
I don't blame him for leaving. Or for symbolically giving the Yankees and their fans the finger on the way out.
But making the announcement in the middle of the last game of the World Series - that was classless. There probably aren't two teams in existence I like less than the Rockies and the Red Sox, but I would never do something like that to them.
by BubbaFan on
Oct 30, 2007 6:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You might have answered this already
by Brendanukkah on
Oct 30, 2007 8:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ummmm....
It's not that I hate religion or anything like that. Heck, Bubba's a very religious guy, at least as such things are judged here in the northeast.
But it's that whole "we're more moral than everyone else" thing, and the implication that god's on their side because of it. The implication being that teams that didn't do as well (such as the Reds) are bad people.
It's...sports Calvinism, that's what it is!
by BubbaFan on
Oct 30, 2007 9:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To be fair
by jch24 on
Oct 30, 2007 9:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know
by BubbaFan on
Oct 30, 2007 9:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In fairness
by Man Mountain on
Oct 30, 2007 9:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Damned good point
by jch24 on
Oct 30, 2007 9:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't really know what to think
So you could be justified in being angry at the reporters who chose to break the story as soon as they got it (In my day...). There's a possibility the Yankees leaked the news to spite Arod and the Sox. As it happened Arod ended up looking really bad to a lot of people, which is not surprising at all.
And after all that Taco Bell crap MLB has no high horse to ride on matters like this.
by Red Menace on
Oct 31, 2007 12:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No press conference
by BubbaFan on
Oct 31, 2007 12:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not so sure
by jch24 on
Oct 30, 2007 9:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't
by BubbaFan on
Oct 30, 2007 9:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The friction begins....
by Man Mountain on
Oct 30, 2007 9:51 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I must be misconfused
by Slyde on
Oct 30, 2007 9:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I heard...
by chandrathan on
Oct 30, 2007 10:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Rebuttal: Yeah, but the Reds have been known to
by Brendanukkah on
Oct 30, 2007 10:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can't do a rebuttal by using the same joke!
by chandrathan on
Oct 30, 2007 10:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahh. Lovely girl, that Miss October...
by Fat Vegas Alan on
Nov 2, 2007 10:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But Miss December! Now, there's a girl that..

by Fat Vegas Alan on
Nov 2, 2007 10:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs

















