Reds Agree To Terms With Shortstop Alex Gonzalez
I'm a little too busy basking in the Ohio State win to do much more than point to the link, but I'm sure I'll have more on Sunday or Monday:
SPN's Peter Gammons is reporting that free agent shortstop Alex Gonzalez has negotiated a three-year, $14 million contract with the Cincinnati Reds, pending a physical.Gonzalez, a slick-fielding shortstop who replaced Edgar Renteria in Boston, is a nine-year veteran who batted .255 with 99 hits and 50 RBI last season for the Red Sox. He had a .985 fielding percentage in 111 games at shortstop in 2006.
Actually really quick analysis ... I like as long as the Reds upgrade the offense significantly somewhere else. If that doesn't happen, then yeah this is a bad move.
It also helps to think of Gonzalez as replacing Royce Clayton, not Felipe Lopez. Lot better move in that light, at least I think.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm new, but if I may say so...
The Reds have committed to Hatteberg at 1B, Phillips is at 2B, and Encarnacion mans 3B. I'm not sure the Reds are going to get any better production at Catcher even if they solve the three-headed monster. Larue had a very bad year, but Ross' career year compensated for that.
In the OF, Dunn could account for an improvement of between 15-20 Runs Created should he revert to pre-2006 form. Griffey's on the downside and a combo of Freel/Deno is most likely better than much of what's available in the FA market considering that the top available FA Outfielders (Soriano, Drew, Lee) aren't viable financial options.
Going into the offseason, the Reds needed to improve their Run Differential by about 150 Runs in order to enter 2007 as legit contenders. That's a bigger gap than they had when they traded Lopez and Kearns away for so little. I've listened to a lot of Reds fans attempt to defend that trade by arguing that the money saved by dealing Lopez would be useful in acquiring real Run value this offseason. Yet, the cash saved was just used to acquire a player (Gonzalez) who was actually worth less in 2006:
2006 WARP (Wins Above Replacement Player):
Lopez: 3.3 WARP
Gonzalez: 1.5 WARP
Now, that gap could be somewhat mitigated (@1 WARP) if Gonzalez played more than the 111 Games in 2006, but that's another issue- he has a history of missing games. The alternative is Juan Castro. Overall, we might just see the Reds very near replacement level for the whole of 2007 at the SS position.
What Krivsky's looking to do is pretty clear- build a pitching/defense-centered team that's also a mediocre offensive unit. Problem is that this signing only slightly addresses team defense and the move really doesn't address the team's Run Differential considering that Aurilia (a bad defensive SS) is probably heading out the door while being actually worth more Runs than his replacement.
The whole thing probably could have been solved by a Phillips switch to SS and Freel at Second Base. Yet, it appears that combo (regardless of actual Run Value) didn't offer the perceived defense Krivsky was looking for. But then, one of the reasons Royce Clayton was acquired in the Lopez/Kearns deal is that he had a reputation as a solid defensive player. Missed on that one he did.
IMHO, he missed on this one too.
by Reds123 on Nov 19, 2006 1:49 AM EST reply actions
Bulletted thoughts
- I suppose if you are going to spend money on defense, shortstop is the place to do it. We won't really know if this contract is over-priced until later in the off-season when we see what other players sign for. I wouldn't say this is a deal, but I'm really interested to see what Lugo gets. If it's a lot more, then I'd say that AGon was a better choice.
- Really the thing that bothers me most about the contract is the 3rd year. I don't like the length for a one-and-a-half-dimensional player. Defensive range is one of the first skills to go. He's still reasonably young (I say that because I turned 30 this year), but by the last year of that contract, he may not have the defensive prowess he has now. If so, his offense could be painful.
- I predict there will be a week when Gonzalez hits .400 with a couple of home runs and drives home the winning run in a game. At the same time there will be a bunch of people saying, "I told you so."
- I also predict that Gonzalez will put up a batting line around: .250/.295/.400. And actually, outside of the OBP, that's not a huge fall-off from what the Reds group of shortstops did last year: .268/.337/.401. In fact, the drop in offense at shortstop wouldn't be so bad if Austin Kearns was still playing right field.
- Gonzalez's bat is ideally suited for the 8th spot, but I wouldn't be surprised if he puts in 150+ PA from the 2-hole. If that happens then his lack of OBP really becomes a problem.
- I guess this means that Brendan Harris is at best a utility guy off of the bench. That may be his proper role in the Majors, but I seem to remember somebody claiming that he was the key to the deal last summer. I guess that was wrong.
- Really, when you think about it, the Reds are spending around $7 million for an infield of Hatteberg, BP, AGon, and EdE. And if EdE makes the improvements that many of us think he will, that could be a pretty good defensive infield.
- The Reds really need another strong bat in their lineup. It will likely need to be in the form of an outfielder, hopefully a centerfielder who is good enough to convince Griffey to move to right. Oh, and if he can put up a batting line around .270/.370/.480 that would be great. I don't know if anybody like that exists, but if he does, we could sure use him.
half full/half empty
*the bullpen needs power arms for this team to contend in '08. ('07 is a foregone conclusion to me)
*'07 is the year of Homer. Can't wait for the kid to emerge.
*I sure hope Junior raises his OBP, and plays 125 games next season.
*do the Reds owe Boston a draft pick for Gonzalez?
by fletch @ Red Reporter on Nov 19, 2006 10:09 AM EST reply actions
Some Random Thoughts
Over 111 games, this line ain't that bad: 13 HR and 70 RBI over the entire season. Like JD, I'll take it if the Reds find some new/better offense in RF.
I'm just not sure who hits lead-off at this point. I guess Freel, to the extent that he starts, but when he is not in there, where do you go, Phillips? Not really an ideal lead-off, as he is not selective enough at the plate (yet).
If Krivsky is going to remake the team into a "small ball/defensive" team, he needs to go all the way -- no more Griffey in CF (he should be in RF), and he needs to make sure there is enough speed in the lineup to manufacture runs. The team is no longer suited for waiting for the long ball. The team also needs to learn how to bunt better. I think that Narron was hesitant to bunt in many places where he could have because he did not have confidence in the player's ability to lay one down.
Best Lineup (based on who we have right now)
(1) Freel - CF
(2) Hatteberg - 1B
(3) Ed E. - 3B
(4) Dunn - LF
(5) Griffey - RF
(6) Ross/Javi - CC
(7) Phillips - 2B
(8) Gonzalez - SS
Speed at the top (Freel); Speed at the bottom (Phillips). The catchers need to make better contact than last year when they had too many K's. They bottom of the line-up also needs to learn how to bunt to move BP into scoring position for the top of the order. This lineup could win games with decent pitching.
I also think that Deno may end up being an everyday player at some point. He has done nothing but hit at every level, and needs only some confidence at the MLB level to succeed there.
by pbinsd on Nov 19, 2006 10:31 AM EST reply actions
Deno Is Struggling
The high market kind of screwed us.
Missing Time
by indy on Nov 19, 2006 11:15 AM EST reply actions
I'm far more comfortable
Good defense makes good offense, or something like that.
For this move to work out...
We're gonna need at least a .900 OPS from Dunn next year, we're gonna need something like .275/.340/.525 from Griffey, and we're gonna need Edwin to show some consistency and be somewhere around the .300/.380/.540 player he has shown the ability to be. With those three, a platoon of Javy/Ross (which should kick ass), Hatteberg not dropping off too much, Phillips showing some mild improvement in on-base skills, and the Freel/Deno combo being sufficiently productive, I think we could get away with this signing quite nicely. The problem is that we're counting on all of that, plus Arroyo not regressing, plus some other starting pitching stepping up, plus Homer making an appearance this year and dominating, plus good bullpen work, none of which I think we can even think about counting on. There aren't any first-rate closers out there except Gagne, and he's a massive and probably unnecessary risk, but I think bringing back Weathers is probably needed and pursuit of someone along the lines of Justin Speier or Danys Baez who might make an adequate closer would be nice as well. The starting pitcher market right now is honestly not worth pursuing anyone. We're looking at Harang, Arroyo, Lohse, Claussen, and Milton to start next year, and that could be surprisingly good or very, very bad.
Meh
Wish it were a 2 year deal because in 2009 he's likely going to be a liability at defense, which pretty much defeats the entire purpose of the signing.
McMillan, Cardenas, Concepcion, Larkin, Lopez........Clayton, Sea Bass. Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Mike Stanton ....Newest Red
Still need a closer.
by fletch @ Red Reporter on Nov 19, 2006 1:17 PM EST reply actions
defense and FB poitchers
Here's Dan Szymborski's take. He points out that nearly all of the Reds' pitchers are flyball pitchers and the outfield defense is still horrible. He critizes Kriv for making moves independently of each other with no cohesion.
I have to think Krivsky's focus on defense will move Jr out of center. If Jr is still in center next year it will be a a major black eye for all of Reds management. There's no way you can have a defensive oriented team with him in center.
Uhh...
If he winds up about average, the Reds could probably have re-signed Royce Clayton for less.
by Paul Householder on Nov 19, 2006 9:39 PM EST reply actions

by 



















