Ownership Notes
- Paul Daugherty, somewhat surprisingly, gets it:
For all kinds of reasons, the Reds of 2005 are the Bengals of the 1990s. You don't want to go there.We understand total makeovers are easier in the socialist NFL, where every team is playing with the same pile of payroll cash. We also see how the two World Series teams this year didn't get there by throwing money. Houston and the Chicago White Sox had payrolls in the modest, $75 million range.
It doesn't take lots of dough to compete. Oakland does it. Minnesota does it. How? That's your charge.
- The Enquirer also has a section on "what the Reds sale means":
What it means to Reds officialsHurray! I'll be the first to say it: if Castellini doesn't clean house right away then we're just getting more of the same old. John Allen and Dan O'Brien need to go, and innovative people need to come in. Paul Depodesta needs a job. Wayne Krivsky would probably still be willing to listen. Both would be improvements. Make it happen Bob!General manager Dan O'Brien and manager Jerry Narron have one year left on their contracts, and early indications are that they are safe for the time being. Reds chief operating officer John Allen is not believed to have a contract for 2006.
- Especially since we'll probably be hearing more about this 1997 land deal where Castellini received a great deal of money for riverfront property needed for GABP construction. So yeah, this whole deal is pretty incestuous. But it would be easy to make the point that business isn't going to be done as usual anymore in Cincinnati. If Castellini comes in and cleans house the city will love him and the franchise will get healthier to boot. Win, win situation.
Take a year to "evaluate" the franchise and we'll know that he's no different from Lindner.
I can't believe that a guy could spend time helping to run the St. Louis franchise and not realize that the Reds are operating in a poisoned atmosphere. I won't believe that things aren't going to be different until Castellini shows me that he's going to continue down the same path that Lindner walked.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
Regardless of what happens
God, he was awful.
by bobestes on
Nov 3, 2005 3:15 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Cleaning House
I agree with JD. It would do so for the confidence of the fans if he took out the trash. But it's kind of hard to do with the way O'brain (yes that's really his name) has jammed everything up. They've already made commitments for next year haven't they?
Anyone else think Chris Sabo should get a job on the yet to be revamped staff?
by sukr on
Nov 4, 2005 12:31 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, well, well
by Pinetarfly on
Nov 4, 2005 9:46 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
'97 article
Here is what I was talking about the other day:
http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2002/12/23/story3.html
Chiquita actually owned (secretly, I might add) the controlling interest of Castellini Co. when Lindner negotiated (supposedly) the county's purchase of Mr. Castellini's land (it was owned by the family, not the company) and the deal to build the Bengals stadium on the western riverfront site. "Whatever Lindner's involvement, this much has long been clear: The Bengals siting decision added millions to the project's price tag." This is because of the additional land the Bengals would need for practice fields, etc.
There has always been a deal among a circle of very few individuals to squeeze every dollar out of their investment by buying out outside competition. The result is that the County has zero negotiating leverage at the bargaining table when Lindner is involved. You have to understand that the County had no intention of purchasing the Castellini land for the purpose of building PBS there.
"Rob Fredericks, a legislative aide to Hamilton County Commissioner John Dowlin, said former Commissioner Bob Bedinghaus changed his bargaining stance on the Castellini land after receiving a phone call from Lindner. Fredericks said he attended a meeting where Bedinghaus disclosed the call."
So Lindner gave Bedinghaus the wink-wink to convince him to agree to the most-expensive option for the county. Result: Lindner, Castellini, & friends make more money.
by Brian B on
Nov 4, 2005 10:18 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Do it, Finkelstein-style
Secure power arms for the bullpen.
Lock in Felipe ASAP.
by ohiobobcat on
Nov 4, 2005 10:07 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Today's Erardi article
That's absurd. The Angels built their team and won it in 2002 under Disney ownership. Disney then sold high to a New York Mexican, slashed beer prices and spent his own money to bring in Bartolo Colon and Vladimir Guerrero. They've won the division the last two years, but Moreno hardly "transformed" the market.
by Brian B on
Nov 4, 2005 10:31 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not that it matters much
http://www.tpj.org/docs/pioneers/pioneers_view.jsp?id=1153
Its amazing what you can learn through google.
by TheDude on
Nov 4, 2005 12:39 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Which means
I read over at RedsZone that Epstein's grandfather was pursued in the McCarthy witchhunt. Interesting stuff.
by JD Arney on
Nov 4, 2005 1:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
However
So that doesn't necessarily rule him out :)
by bobestes on
Nov 4, 2005 2:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs

















