Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Mike Leake and his workload

Baseball tends to have a rule, the Verducci Rule as some call it, that a young pitcher doesn't exceed 30 innings pitched in a season over his previous career high. Mike Leake threw 142 innings last season for Arizona State, then took 5 months off before going to the AFL, so I can't really add those innings in like I have seen some others do. That ideally would put Leake on pace for 170 innings or so before you would like to 'shut it down' if you abide by the +30 rule.

This all got me thinking though, as Mike Leake isn't your typical 'young pitcher'. He is averaging less than 15 pitches per inning, routinely getting through 6 innings in 90 or fewer pitches. So I decided to look at all pitchers with 1 inning in either direction of Leake (between 59-61 IP this season) and how many pitches they would throw if they kept their current pace so far and threw 200 innings this season.

After the jump is the list, sorted by most pitches on pace to throw for 200 innings:

Star-divide

 

Pitcher IP Pitches If he threw 200ip
Clayton Kershaw 59.33 1052 3546
Joe Saunders 59.33 1000 3371
Jon Garland 60 1006 3353
Paul Maholm 61 990 3246
John Danks 60.67 978 3224
Matt Cain 59.33 956 3223
Brett Meyers 61 968 3174
David Price 59.67 943 3161
Roy Oswalt 61 950 3115
Bronson Arroyo 59.33 918 3095
Barry Zito 61 927 3039
Scott Baker 60.33 909 3013
Mitch Talbot 60.33 892 2957
Mike Leake 60 887 2957
Hirokia Kuroda 59.33 877 2956
Mark Buehrle 59.33 877 2956
Livan Hernandez 60.67 895 2950
Tim Hudson 60.33 865 2868

 

Now looking solely at the extreme of things, I ran the difference between Mike Leake and the Dodgers stud Clayton Kershaw over pitches thrown. If Mike Leake were given the 3546 pitches that Kershaw is on pace for over 200 innings, Mike Leake would throw an additional 40 innings in the exact same amount of pitches. Likewise, if we gave Kershaw the 2957 pitches that Leake would be on pace for over 200 innings, Kershaw would only throw 166.2 innings.

So while Leake is on pace for a lot of innings, I don't quite think that the +30 rule quite applies to him like it may for others who aren't quite as efficient with their pitches. I don't want to see Leake throw 225 innings this year by any means, but simply using an innings limit on Leake based on the +30 seems a little short sighted given how large of a difference we can get by simply being pitch efficient compared to some other young pitchers.

Comment 30 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I still would err on the side of caution with Leake.

Just because he’s awesome and I’d be sad if he got hurt due to overuse.

by jsl413 on May 26, 2010 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Well of course

But at what point do you set that at? And what do you base that conclusion on?

by dougdirt on May 26, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dunno.

I’m not saying he should have an inning cap or whatever, but I’d just be careful with him later in the year. I wouldn’t want him to throw more than 500 more pitches this year than he has in past seasons.

by jsl413 on May 26, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's hope

Leake is in touch with people who can not only manage his mechanics but teach him how to recover from a game. This is a science now and for this kid, a lot of career is at stake.

I think it’s unfair to ask anybody in the dugout or even the front office to understand the mechanics of an arm, a shoulder or an elbow. That’s up to a lot of smart people and IMHO, it’s up to Leake to make sure HE understands that.

Now I also realize that he can’t go around getting 23 opinions and having them all collide on the day he’s penciled in to pitch. In that respect, the people in the dugout and the front office ALSO have to be in on the gag.

Sadly, I still see baseball as operating under the same rules it always has: We found this kid and we can find another one after he’s gone.

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 26, 2010 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Let me also toss in

… he doesn’t seem to pitch from the stretch very often, as compared to some other guys on the Reds staff. I guess maybe the people who do the counting here might factor in the difference between a windup and a stretch, or maybe a slide step.

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 26, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its the American Business Model John.

My name is Madville and I'm a JonnyGomesLaynceNixaddict.

by Madville on May 26, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that perhaps a "muscle tightness" DL trip should be in Leake's future.

If we make it, we need this kid to be hurling for us in the postseason.

No amount of prosperity is sufficient to eliminate all misfortune, and sloth is impervious to opportunity.

by kazahani2 on May 26, 2010 2:07 PM EDT reply actions  

but that would mean (gasp!)

still another long list of posts by bloggers about how Dusty ruined still another young arm.
How on EARTH can the man endure that?

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 26, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

People will cool down on him if we can get the Central this year.

No amount of prosperity is sufficient to eliminate all misfortune, and sloth is impervious to opportunity.

by kazahani2 on May 26, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

The '03 Cubs respectfully disagree

Now pitching, Francisco Cor-deritgoes!!!

www.nextyearisouryear.blogspot.com

by chazerize on May 26, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

cool post.

nice work.

"Now onto more important things: Punching Errorlando Cabrerror in the fucking tits." -Geki

by GrooveLeg on May 26, 2010 2:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Verducci effect has yet to receive any kind of decent empirical backing

That said, I agree with exercising caution with Leake. But I also agree that the issue is more an issue of pitches (and ideally types of pitches, with extra weighting for more stressful pitching and situations) than the number of outs he gets (which is essentially what innings measures).
-j

by JinAZ on May 26, 2010 2:57 PM EDT reply actions  

I was actually thinking about this earlier this morning!

I think that the fact that he is not a maximum effort pitcher helps his recovery time.

My thought is that he should probably have 2-3 starts skipped at some point this year. Or, around some off days, leave the other pitchers on their normal rest, and give Leake the extra day.

"To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other." - Jack Handey

by JJ on May 26, 2010 3:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Also helps that he hasn't been trying to pitch out of a lot of jams

those sorts of innings tend to be more stressful on the pitcher’s arm.

Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter

by Slyde on May 26, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

So wouldn't the 142 IP last year

Have been achieved with fewer pitches than most would have required? That seems to be the kind of pitcher that he is. So if we’re concerned about the increase year-to-year, this shouldn’t make any difference.

When you come to the fork in the road, take it.

by poojols on May 26, 2010 4:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Leake and Arizona State

I don’t have pitch counts for all games, but there were some games where he was throwing 110+ pitches last year. The defense and aluminum bat make a difference.

by dougdirt on May 26, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Homer Bailey

Verducci did predict Homer as a high risk pitcher based on his September workload last year, and while everyone says its not major he is on the DL.

Just throwing that out there

by Tony Cornell Big Red on May 26, 2010 5:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I think they should let it fly with Leake.

I was laughing earlier today that the Nationals are going to delay Strasburg’s major league debut in order to keep him under the 100 IP mark for the year. Isn’t he still pitching while in AAA? I realize they can shorten his outings in the minors more easily, but by how much? Does it really hurt the major league team to have a guy throw 5 shutout innings and then leave the game? It’s a stupid inning cap and a stupid decision to hold him in the minors longer to avoid reaching it.

by Brian B on May 26, 2010 5:51 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Strasburg

Is being held down for contractual reasons, plain and simple. It has nothing at all to do with holding down his innings and everything to do with keeping him for that extra season.

by dougdirt on May 26, 2010 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then why the fuss about bringing him up in the middle of June instead of the end of May?

They shouldn’t be worried about super 2 anymore. I thought it was because they had a deal where they won’t make him throw more than 100 innings in the majors.

by Brian B on May 27, 2010 8:50 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

No clue

But I seriously doubt any player would be agreeing to some sort of ‘deal’ that minimizes his MLB time.

by dougdirt on May 27, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pitchers these days are pussies.

Bob Gibson pitched 8 years of 250+ innings, 2 of them 300+

Watch it, ass blood.

by -ManBearPig on May 26, 2010 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

If Gibson

had been brought up in todays game, he wouldn’t be throwing those innings totals. There are multiple reasons why and none of them have to do with him being more of a man than guys today.

by dougdirt on May 26, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah ,,,I remember Gibson and nobody...fucked with him

Especially the manager..BG stayed in when he wanted to and he was a real ‘pitcher’ and not a hard throwing idiot.

My name is Madville and I'm a JonnyGomesLaynceNixaddict.

by Madville on May 26, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Part of Gibson's success

was the higher mound and that’s been discussed for lots of reasons. His 1968 numbers are awesome. Comparing him and his contemporaries to today’s pitchers is technically unfair but is pretty much unavoidable.

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 26, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bob Gibson was a pussy

Cy Young pitched 16 years of 300+ innings, 5 of them 400+

by ken on May 26, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

You leave out Old Hoss Radbourne

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 26, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Cincinnati Reds. Community Guidlines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Long-hair-baseball-player_small
Red Reporter Field Trip: Taking in BP at GABP, but not with BP
Turtle17_small
The Draft: Reds all-time best, 1 through 40.
Anime_small
The Ranch (Bailey vs. Sale)
Anime_small
Rainy Sunday (Leake vs. Skaggs)
Mister_redlegs_hasaposse1_small
Requiem For Riverfront

Recent FanPosts

500x_custom_1271135923567_jaybruce_small
2012 Depth Concerns
1295279046-zack-morris-phone_small
Why Is Ryan Hanigan's Bat Wasted?
Herve_small
From The Opponent's Feed™: Not-a-Homer Simpson
Turtle17_small
The Draft: Richie Shaffer-3B-Clemson.
Rorschach_small_small
Sunday's Rockies game - Anyone here going?
1310_small
Pls Help Me Figure Out Who Signed This Ball
Anime_small
A Salami For Soto (Villareal vs. Cloyd)
Anime_small
Waiting here in Allentown... (Gallagher vs. Hyatt)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Yahoo_full_count

Bench Coaches

How-thomas-the-tank-engine-works-11_small BK

Ken_fish_called_wanda_small ken

Zombie-mlb_small Charlie Scrabbles

340x_charliesheen_small Kevin Mitchell is Batman

5851799_small FordhamRam

Lurch_small UncleWeez

Long-hair-baseball-player_small -ManBearPig

Nyc_small AC Slider

Beat Reporters

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Turtle17_small Thundering Turtle

Small riverfront76

Piñata_small kcgard2