Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

A clear-headed defense of Dusty

Okay, I'll begin this with the disclaimer that I'm extremely pissed about how that game ended.


Upon further review, the following that have been discussed as reasons to finally get rid of Dusty that I don't believe are really obvious manager errors (in order of occurrence:

  • Taking Leake out after 6 innings – He was at 99 pitches.  That's a perfect pitch count for him.  They were up 6, and had a well rested bullpen.  No reason to tax a young arm.
  •  Defensive replacement for Miguel Cairo – Really, we need a new 3rd baseman in the 9th inning of a 6-run game?  Doesn't that seem like more of a slap in the face to both Paul Janish and Cairo to take Cairo out and to give Janish 1 defensive inning?
  •  Defensive replacement for Laynce Nix – if memory serves me well, Nix is actually a pretty good fielder.  Plus, see above.
  • Lincoln in the 9th - Again, I can't believe I’m typing this, but he’d only thrown 19 pitches.  That’s not that many pitches.  I mean, he’d gone 1-2-3 in the 7th and 8th.  He’d thrown more pitches before, even this year.  And, again, they were up 6 runs!  Might it have been a good time for Carlos Fisher to clean up?  Maybe.  Maybe that’s when you get Masset back out there to regain his confidence.  Or maybe you leave the pitcher that’s throwing well in for the 9th.
  •  Massett in the 9th – 9-5 with runners on the corners.  Here's an opportunity to show a guy some confidence after a rough outing the day before.  Don't look at the season ERA - it's ugly, yes.  But in May, he's been money with a 1.17 WHIP and 1.93 ERA coming into the game.  All he has to do is get 3 outs without giving up 2 runs of his own.  Not necessarily THE best decision, but I can see an argument supporting this one.
  • Bringing in Cordero – I can't believe I'm typing this, but I don't think this was a bad decision either.  I don't think it was the correct decision, though, given that Rhodes had just K'd the hottest Braves' hitter, but it certainly is defensible.  Cordero's really not <em>that</em> HR-prone.  He gave up 2 in 66 innings last year!!

All in all, there are logical explanations for Dusty’s bullpen use.  Especially Lincoln starting off the 9th, the decision I’d been most angry about.  19 pitches isn’t that many, and he went 6 up 6 down. 

 

Now, Dusty’s not perfect.  Here are some decisions that I think were poor:

  • Using Miguel Cairo instead of Paul Janish – Okay, Miguel Cairo got a base hit with the bases loaded in the 2nd inning.  Maybe Janish gets a base hit there, but probably not.  Whole new ballgame without that hit that extended the inning to Votto.  That said, use Janish.  He’s not only the better player now, he’ll be the better player for the future of your team.
  • Pinch hitting Owings for Leake in the 7th and not pitching OwingsLeake’s batting .353.  .353!!!  If you’re going to pinch hit a pitcher for him, even if that pitcher is Owings, you better use that pitcher.  Otherwise, either let the guy bat for himself (given he’s gotten 2 hits that game), or pinch hit one of your better hitters (Rolen, Gomes, Heisey even Janish).  Plus, what a perfect time to keep your long reliever ready for, you know, long relief.  Yes, he threw last night.  5 pitches.  He can go again.  He’s thrown the ball to the catcher in a live game 5 times since May 7.  He needs the work.  And we were up 6.  Not a bad time for him.
  • Not getting someone up after back to back singles to lead off the 9th – Dusty, you’re using a pitcher who hasn’t pitched 3 innings in years.  Yes, you’re up 6 runs, but after back to back singles to lead off the 9th, you better have someone loosening.  During that 3rd batter, you better send Ramon out to stall a little, just in case, you know.

I think that last point is the biggest one of all.  Not being prepared to relieve a pitcher who you know is being somewhat stretched in the 9th inning to close out a game was a terrible decision.

 

Ah, I feel much better.  Thanks RR for being my shrink late this night!

Poll
After thinking more clearly about it, I grade Dusty's use of the bullpen as a:
A: I am a Braves fan
5 votes
B: Pretty good. Good decisions don't always lead to good outcomes.
10 votes
C: I was pissed at first. After clearing my head, I can at least give Dusty this.
19 votes
D: Ugh. My dog could've done better!
39 votes
F: Fire Dusty NOW!!!
29 votes
Boobs: I need to think about something else instead.
22 votes

124 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 99 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No

That was indefensible. Dusty pulled a Hanley and gave no effort. Is it possible to sit him down for a few games? Maybe Walt could tell him to take the Cleveland series off.

When you come to the fork in the road, take it.

by poojols on May 21, 2010 5:38 AM EDT reply actions  

A slap in the face?

Hardly. It would be standard operating procedure on most other teams. Either putting in LIDRs or giving the scrubs a chance to play, depending on the score.

You think Miguel Cairo is going to be insulted at being pulled from the game? He’s happy just to be a big leaguer at this point. And you think Janish would be insulted to get a half-inning on the field? He’d be thrilled just to be let out of his box.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 6:30 AM EDT reply actions  

it would be if logic were the only thing that mattered

But egos matter, too. I think Dusty is really reluctant to put in a LIDR for Cabrera, even though it’s painfully obvious to everyone that Cabrera’s GG days are well behind him.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 23, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's more likely he'd put in a LIDR for Cairo than for Janish

With a huge lead, he could have put in the scrubs, though.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 25, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you did a good job defendin Dusty here

The biggest problem I have is that Lincoln and Cairo are in the team. Dusty using them is second. Yesterday is why. But Dusty didn’t make any in-game switches that lost the game IMO.

by Brian B on May 21, 2010 9:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Precisely

Dusty didn’t make any in-game switches. That lost the game IMO.

by Brendanukkah on May 21, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually I'm with JJ on this

what happened yesterday isn’t suppose to happen. Lincoln is the 5th man in a 7 man bullpen, and he was only at 19 pitches. I would have left Lincoln in if I were Dusty.

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 22, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

the problem isn't that he left Lincoln in

It’s that he left Lincoln in without considering that a meltdown could be the result.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 22, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i probably would have assumed a 6-run lead was safe, too

also, if you let him go out there but have someone else warming up, it doesnt do a lot to build up his confidence.

Retractions are for journalists! -Gray

by boobs on May 22, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do we really care about Lincoln's confidence?

Dude shouldn’t even be on the roster anyway. Let him continue to get his teeth kicked in, and hopefully Walt will do the right thing and DFA Lincoln and bring up someone from Louisville

by Highlifeman21 on May 23, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

or you know would could just root for the guy to do well and not need to DFA him

And who in Louisville is better than Lincoln? Fisher is also a soft spot in the bullpen. If Bray and Burton were ready, perhaps send out both Lincoln and Fisher, but Bray and Burton are not ready.

Plus Lincoln has only allowed runs in 5 of his 16 apperances. That doesn’t seem terrible. Lincoln is the 5th or 6th man, and is servicable for that role, especially considering the Reds don’t have better options.

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 24, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

actually i looked at Lincoln's stats more closely

and he didn’t record an out in a few of those scoreless appearances. But I still contend that they don’t have many better options at this moment.

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 25, 2010 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also outside of opening day Lincoln has been pretty solid

Lincoln got through 2 innings without issue, if I were following the game I wouldn’t have thought twice about Lincoln pitching the ninth.

Also if Dusty had removed Lincoln for Fisher or Masset, and they would have melted down, wouldn’t we just bitch about Dusty making too many pitching changes?

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 22, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying he should not have sent Lincoln out there again

Just that he should have had someone warming…just in case. Three innings is pushing it for a reliever, IMO. Especially Lincoln.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 22, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely agree.

Again, it’s not just having someone warming for Lincoln, it’s not having CoCo ready in time either. It didn’t look like anyone who came in had adequate time to warm up.

"There is no such thing as an innocent Gatorade cooler."

by Ash on May 22, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah that is a fair argument

I see what you mean.

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 22, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look Lincoln doesn't need his confidence pandered to...Christ on a Roof Beam, he's vet.MLB pitcher...

Dusty doesn’t think ahead well…there is no clear headed defense for a manager who isn’t always considering and preparing for the ‘what ifs’..Hmmm, Lincoln hasn’t pitched 3 full innings in a long time..what if the wheels fall off? Maybe we should have someone soft tossing in the pen in just in case. etc.

The 2010 Reds – "It could have been a lot worse"
by RedsMasochist on May 4, 2010 8:47 PM EDT

by Madville on May 22, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see any problem with pulling Leake after six innings.

Also, I don’t feel the need to put in a defensive replacement for Nix. He’s a decent defensive LF.

I would have put Janish in for either Cabrera or Cairo. Every now and then, that matters; it just turns out to have mattered this time. I would also point out that it’s rather ridiculous to say that Cairo got a hit, but Janish probably wouldn’t have. Regardless of how good of a hitter you actually think Janish is, he’s significantly more likely to get a hit in any given AB than Cairo is.

Pinch hitting with Owings? Someone mentioned in one of the threads that he wanted to give Owings ABs since he was near home, so it was just a stupid Dusty move. It was a bigger mistake to PH with Owings the night before and then only pitch him one inning instead of two.

The big mistake here is the one that you separate into two: he left Lincoln in for a third inning, with nobody warming up. Sure, it seems silly to have to do this with such a huge lead, but he should have known it was possible to fuck this up. If he was going to push a guy into a situation he has just not excelled in then he needs to have a backup plan. Better yet, just put in someone else who could use some work. Not a big deal at all.

Once he made that supremely stupid move, he seemed determined to compound it. Either bring in Rhodes, bring in Masset, or bring in Cordero, but don’t bring in all three without proper warmup time and then wonder why they keep giving up runs. The Cordero decision in particular seems based entirely on it being a save situation, which only further compounds the stupidity.

Let me write out a formal proof for you.

by Gray on May 21, 2010 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

jesus christ on toast
Someone mentioned in one of the threads that he wanted to give Owings ABs since he was near home, so it was just a stupid Dusty move.

That hadn’t occurred to me before, but now it all makes sense. Micah is a Georgia boy.

(Of course, that didn’t stop Dusty from keeping Janish securely crated throughout the Houston series, even though his house is practically right next door to the ballpark and his family was undoubtedly there, hoping to see their boy.)

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Dang

Dusty really has it out for Janish.

Cairo has more PAs than Janish, but less starts. Janish is basically Cabrera’s back-up when he needs a every week rest every 6-7 games and an occasional LIDR, while Cairo is the Dusty’s fill-in at every other infield position, pinch-hitter and LIDR/utility-man.

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show

by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on May 21, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

This was a good post, but here's a clear-headed rebuttal:

On Lincoln: True he hadn’t thrown that many pitches, but he’s shown this year that he can’t really even handle 2 innings of work. 19 pitches is equivalent to one rough-ish inning, and with plenty of guys to choose from, it was just unnecessary to send him out there for the 3rd. (plus, I just can’t shake the feeling that Dusty sent him out to let him earn a save. Seriously, would you put it past him?) Also, not having someone warming up is ridiculous. Just to assume that he’ll be fine for a 3rd inning is lazy at best, ignorant at worst. Also, he should’ve thought to himself “I’d really like to not have to use any of my big 3 here, so let’s get Fisher going just in case.” What’s lost in this is that even if we’d won, we used our three late innings guys completely unnecessarily.

LIDR: I agree that replacing Cairo and/or Nix was probably unnecessary, esp. since the upgrade to Janish (esp. at 3rd) or Heisey would be somewhat negligible. However, something that’s bothering me is that Janish didn’t replace Cabrera in the 6th or 7th inning with the huge lead. Offense doesn’t matter at that point, and Lando NEVER gets a day off. Why not sit him for a few innings to give him a bit of a break? He does this with other players, why not with the 35 year-old slow SS?

Cordero: The Cordero use is really indefensible. True, he’s not super HR prone, but he is extremely walk prone. You’ve got the bases loaded with one out and a 3 run lead. What you need is a guy to come in and throw some strikes, and Cordero doesn’t do that. It wasn’t the issue yesterday, but it very well could’ve been. What really chaps me about this is his quote. He basically said that it’s CoCo’s job to close it out, and Rhodes’ job to get a tough hitter out, but you know if it was the 8th Rhodes would’ve stayed out there. Basically, it’s CoCo’s job to get all the saves. Which is beyond stupid.

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 9:57 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

resting the SS
Offense doesn’t matter at that point, and Lando NEVER gets a day off. Why not sit him for a few innings to give him a bit of a break? He does this with other players, why not with the 35 year-old slow SS?

I have to think it’s because Slo-Cab doesn’t want to sit. He’s had several seasons where he played 160 games or more. Jeter hasn’t had even one, and he’s in the AL, where you can get half-days off, and is also notorious for hating to sit out a game, and making the manager’s life a living hell if he’s on the bench, even if it’s for good reason (like illness or injury).

Five years where he played 160 games or more…I don’t think that happens unless it’s really important to the player.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

But isn't it the manager's job

to put the team’s interests above the player’s interests?

Let me write out a formal proof for you.

by Gray on May 21, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

pardon my french, but fuck what he wants

Lando is also old, slow, and declining. Nobody ever wants to sit. I’m sure Rolen doesn’t like sitting either, but he needs to or else he’ll fall apart. Lando has been durable, but I can’t help but think a few more days rest and he might be in a bit better shape at this point.

I’m not saying you are supporting this, I just think this is a really terrible excuse not to rest a player (for 2 or 3 innings!!!)

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

This is not the first time I’ve heard the rationale that Lando doesn’t want to sit, but no players WANTS to sit, and Lando is not anywhere remotely near having the superstar cache of demanding to play. Who cares what he wants? Everyone wants the team to win, and if this is the rationale for all of Lando’s playing time, it is extremely selfish on the part of both Lando and Dusty.

by kcgard2 on May 22, 2010 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not having pitchers warming in the ninth was pretty egregious

The whole of Lincoln’s career, with three major arm surgeries and this spring training’s abortive audition for the starting rotation, should stand as clear evidence that he’s not a long innings guy. I think its great that he’s been able to bounce back from injuries and he’s been serviceable as a low-leverage guy, but no early regular season game should kick on the autopilot like that. It felt like spring training again, with incoln getting three innings, Cairo and Nix starting.

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show

by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on May 21, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

And I'm curious how not being sufficiently warmed up

affected the relief corps. I know Masset can’t have had enough time, but maybe Rhodes and Cordero were fine. In any case, I agree with you on Rhodes. If there had been any consideration of the match-ups and types of pitchers Rhodes and Cordero are, over and above the fact that it’s excessive to go through 3 relievers in one inning, Cordero would never have entered the game.

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show

by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on May 21, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cordero got beat on a damn good pitch

97 MPH on the outside corner? I’ll take that all of the time. I don’t think Cordero was hurting from lack of warming up.

Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter

by Slyde on May 21, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is true, and I for one am not upset with CoCo

still, given the situation and CoCo’s control problems, it really didn’t make sense to put him in there unless you are dead-set on getting your closer every available save.

Even looking at the guy at the plate, he doesn’t hit that exact same pitch right-handed (down and away, 97 mph). Why not leave Rhodes in to face him, then decide whether to bring in CoCo?

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think so either

And it was a freak home run to boot. It probably stays in the park without the boost from Nix. I just wasn’t aware as to whether he’d been warming up for a while prior to entering the game.

But I don’t think Cordero should have been there in the first place. Even if you’re OK with favoring CoCo over Rhodes in that situation, burning relievers in such short order ill-advised. Owings, the long-man Dusty likes to hold back for emergencies, had already been used up on a PH. If the game had tied, it would have been DRH and Fisher for extras.

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show

by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on May 21, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree on the 6th or 7th inning defensive replacement when up 8

Especially when the Braves replaced Jones and McCann (they beat us in the 9th without those guys!). It would’ve been nice to get Janish a few more AB’s.

Also good point on Cordero. I hate the excuse that if there’s a save opportunity available, Coco is the only one that can get it. Terrible excuse. As you said, beyond stupid.

"To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other." - Jack Handey

by JJ on May 21, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Didn't Cordero blow a save earlier this season

becasue it was his 5th day in a row pitching?

No amount of prosperity is sufficient to eliminate all misfortune, and sloth is impervious to opportunity.

by kazahani2 on May 21, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even more stupid

was that Heyward was just the first out. Rhodes could have gotten Conrad for the second out….then Dusty could have brought in Cordero to get his precious little save.

Of course, a double play would’ve foiled Dusty.

Fire Joe Morgan, Reds. For real!

by cesarhernandez on May 21, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Rhodes move hurt the most, as far as I'm concerned.

Two straight relievers run out there without recording an out. Rhodes gets in and strikes out the first batter he faces – finally, an effective reliever, and……..he pulls him.

He sits alone...Reds are not home.

by Gapper on May 21, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Was Rhodes that effective?

Yes, he struck out the Braves’ hottest hitter. But he did go to 3-1 before that, though, so… okay, I’m grasping at straws here! Coco always goes to 3-ball counts!

Rhodes has been absolutely amazing. If I could clone him, I would in a minute and fill 1/2 of my bullpen with Rhodes and Rhodes clones.

I really didn’t like that move when it was made… especially against a switch hitter. It’s not like we ended up with a matchup improvement with Coco in the ballgame. I can see a justification… just not a good one.

"To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other." - Jack Handey

by JJ on May 21, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

To me, it's two different things.

There are a couple moves that are reasonable, a couple that were at least kind of defensible, and a couple moves that were so ridiculous, and because we blew the game, it makes Dusty’s entire record look even worse.

Taking Leake out was not at all a bad idea. Putting Cordero in was not exactly a bad move – but really unecessary seeming. It really felt like Dusty was trying to do LaRussa’s bit where he overmanages the bullpen, in order to overcompensate for undermanaging earlier.

But why not put Janish in? We have to play Paul Janish sometime – and the best time is when you don’t need to count on scoring runs the next few innings.

And for the love of god, if you throw Lincoln out there for a third inning, have someone ready to come in immediately. Just having him out there for more than one is risky – to make that kind of move, you absolutely need to account for that risk and have backup ready.

Oh, and can we talk about Dusty throwing Coco under the bus after the game? How is that handling a big ego? How is that being a player’s manager? All I’ve ever heard to justify the ridiculous salary we’re paying Baker is that he’s a good clubhouse guy and protects his players. Well, all I’ve ever seen is him throw his players under the bus. From “these aren’t my guys” to rejecting any blame for this fiasco, and putting it all on CoCo, which is blatantly ridiculous.

I voted for D, but I wish I could change it now. If he can’t protect his players, especially the ego of the highest paid player on the goddamn team, he really has nothing that can justify him being our manager. Fire Dusty Baker.

This team wouldn't be so bad if it weren't for all the losing.

by andromache on May 21, 2010 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

yeah, I've seen comments/posts on here about this very thing before

Dusty’s strange way of defending some guys and chucking others under the bus.

I couldn’t figure it out. There was no unifying factor uniting the guys he either defended or chucked. I think I’ve got it now, though.

He’ll defend guys if he doesn’t see it as being bad on him (defending CoPat and Willy T because there weren’t other options, defending Stubbs and Bruce because “you’ve got to give young guys time”) But when he senses he’s in the wrong, under the bus goes the player.

When Stubbs came up and raked, and made everyone wonder why Taveras played so long, Dusty basically slagged on Taveras and said he got Wally Pipped. Whenever a player just blatantly screws up (CoCo blows a save when he entered with a 2 run lead to start the ninth, for example) he defends them to the death. Today, he probably sensed he did a terrible job, so under the bus goes the player.

It’s really sickening and frighteningly immature.

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sometimes I think RR doth whine and complain too much....

The sky isn’t falling…

"the only place they lost was the scoreboard"

by Ewok on May 21, 2010 11:15 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

FWIW

It ain’t just RR. A large portion of Reds fans are overreacting to this one.

Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter

by Slyde on May 21, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

is it really overreacting?

I’m asking honestly. I’m not that upset still, I understand it was just one game, if they win tonight we’ll all feel better, etc.

But this was a truly monumental, epic loss. Also one that also seemed completely avoidable.

My take is that how the team responds will determine whether we are overreacting or not.

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your last sentence is the truth

But yeah, I think it is overreacting. A big loss is still just a loss.

I’m not saying that people shouldn’t analyze it. I don’t have a problem with that. But I saw a lot of “heads should roll” and “here we go again” type comments yesterday all around the net. That’s overreacting.

Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter

by Slyde on May 21, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

true

after I posted this I realized that the whole “OMGZ THE SEASON’S OVER” stuff was what you were probably referring to.

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was shit stirring, a tad

But the fact the lineup has been healthy and the starting pitching is coming around gives much room for optimism.

I will be much more concerned when the injuries start mounting. I’m not thrilled with the roster depth.

"the only place they lost was the scoreboard"

by Ewok on May 21, 2010 11:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think both are equally important

Can’t use it if you don’t have it.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dusty can't fake it either.

The 2010 Reds – "It could have been a lot worse"
by RedsMasochist on May 4, 2010 8:47 PM EDT

by Madville on May 21, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I will say this.

I would have been a lot less pissed off about this game if I had been back in NC watching and cursing from the comfort of my own home.

Also it would have mattered less if we had gotten lucky and pulled out the first game of the series.

It would have even been better if we had been beaten by solid effort on their side. But this? This combination of a ton of errors and completely stupid managerial decisions? This pisses me off.

I don’t think the season’s over, but I do think that this is indicative of the kind of crap we’ll keep seeing (though hopefully not to such an extent ever again) throughout the season, and the managerial bullshit at least could be easily remedied. But it won’t be.

Also: it took all of the fun out of seeing Votto hit a grand slam in person. This makes me sad.

Let me write out a formal proof for you.

by Gray on May 21, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think a lot of it is overreacting.

After 5-2-05, I had to take about a week off from Reds baseball. I had no confidence that any lead was was safe. And it wasn’t. There was nothing to blame yesterday on that will not be present in every game from here on out. It wasn’t raining or cold and windy. It’ll be the same unreliable cast of characters tonight and tomorrow and the next night.

And it doesn’t seem that the people complaining are on the same page. Most blame Dusty but can’t agree on why. I really don’t blame him for much other than pitching Lincoln at all, but I’ll say that every time he gives the ball to Lincoln. I’m glad he didn’t make any defensive replacements. I can’t stand when managers do that. Boone and Narron did that all the time and it usually came back to bite us in the ass when the pitcher gives up the go-ahead homeruns. If the palyers in the field aren’t good enough to field their positions, they shouldn’t be on the team. Period.

by Brian B on May 21, 2010 2:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It is time to move on me thinks.

We are five above .500, half game out of first, and on to Cleveland and their dwelling in the basement of the AL central.

Who is our DH and what will our lineup be? I am guessing (hoping) Hiesey plays left and Gomes is our designated masher/energizer of this ballclub.

Tanzen!

by Verka Serduchka on May 21, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I forgot we get a DH! That's exciting!

I hope you’re right. I’d love to see Heisey in LF and Gomes as DH.

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely expect to see Gomes as the DH

the question is, will Heisey get to play over Nix?

see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka

by nycredsfan on May 21, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's overreacting

Remember the last time the Reds played a postseason game? “Only” one game can make quite the difference.

When you come to the fork in the road, take it.

by poojols on May 21, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not saying the game doesn't matter

just saying the season isn’t over because of this one loss.

Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter

by Slyde on May 21, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe a different viewpoint

As fans, we can evaluate talent at our whim and it’s clear Lincoln and Cairo are the primary targets in our attack. Both are on the Reds roster for reasons that escape us, but obviously don’t escape the Reds management. I don’t like Lincolns, Fords or Buicks.

I didn’t want Cairo on the team, period. He’s there. Can’t say why.

But to defend or condemn Dusty is no different than saying Bobby Cox is a damned lucky or smart manager because his team pulled out a miracle victory, which would be what we’d be saying about our beloved manager had we come back from a 6-run hole in the 9th inning.

Spending a lot of time defending Baker is pointless.

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 21, 2010 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

we can blame Dusty all we like for this

but i dont think it’s reasonable to expect him to anticipate such a monumental bullpen collapse. this is the kind of thing that happens once every few years, and you just have to chalk it up to bad luck. i know it helps to vent the frustration by directing at an individual, but this wasnt Dusty’s fault. shit happens.

by Charlie Scrabbles on May 21, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I think this is different because

(1) Lincoln was pitching his third inning, and
(2) Knowing (1), he still let things escalate significantly before making any moves.

Nobody would have expected Dusty to put in Rhodes and freak out if he allowed any baserunners at all. But this failure to express a small amount of concern giving the situation he created? That’s a disgrace.

Let me write out a formal proof for you.

by Gray on May 21, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

In defense of degate

Keeping Lincoln on the payroll is pure folly. There has to be somebody who is cheaper with more talent somewhere between here and Mount Whatever that exploded in Iceland.

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 21, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont think so

are you telling me Dusty should have the foresight to anticipate the possibility of blowing a 6 run lead? no manager should ever manage on the impetus that pitcher X cant hold a 6 run lead, no matter who that is. it’s perfectly reasonable to assume that you yourself could hold a 6 run lead against the Braves. they just didnt this time. i dont think it was because of managerial malfeasance or any other concrete cause and effect. they just lost it. crazy shit happens like that every now and again.

they did rout one of the best young starters in the majors yesterday. should Dusty be given credit equal to his blame for his stupid lineup scoring so many? i dont think so.

by Charlie Scrabbles on May 21, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well, given that a team had scored 8 runs in a single inning in that same game.

Yes, I think that Dusty should have had enough foresight to IMAGINE that a relief pitcher could blow even a lead that big, and at least had someone warming up in case Lincoln faltered.

This team wouldn't be so bad if it weren't for all the losing.

by andromache on May 21, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that's what angers me

I’m semi-okay with letting Lincoln go for the three inning save with a big lead. But Dusty has to anticipate that something could go wrong. Maybe not a total collapse, but have someone – even Fisher – up and throwing in case Lincoln gets in trouble. Like, say, the first two batters get on. Then yank Lincoln, congratulate him on his two good innings and his effort, and let your warmed up bullpen slam the door.

by Brendanukkah on May 21, 2010 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still feel like Dusty just kind of sat around and watched until it was too late though.

The fact that he didn’t put anyone in the pen until Lincoln had already allowed 2 runners in his second inning of work is just kind of pathetic.

"People don't kill people. Burning oreo packages kill people."

by crolfer on May 21, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess my final point on this

why on Earth does Lincoln just not try to pitch better?
This isn’t really an academic question aimed at the wall. Seriously, the man is a major league professional baseball pitcher and he knows what doesn’t work. But he didn’t fix his game. In this respect, it ain’t about Baker.

It’s about Lincoln.

Now it’s about the franchise deciding if this sort of performance is either (a.) a freak event in baseball or (b.) an unacceptable trend

If the Cards were a Fortune 500 company, they'd be on their way to hostile takeover. -- RedHot Mama

by johnu1 on May 21, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lincoln in the 9th

I really think Dusty went with Lincoln in the 9th because he could get a save by pitching three innings. That arbitrary stat has a crazy way of influencing managers’ decisions.

by Red Menace on May 21, 2010 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly.

And that is why the bullshit that happened yesterday is blamed on Dusty. But, onward and upward. Sweep the Tribe, sweep the Bucs and sweep the ’Stros. Go in to St. Louis back in first.

Watch it, ass blood.

by -ManBearPig on May 21, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

he had only thrown 19 pitches

honestly, what would you have done? Lincoln was absolutely perfect in 2 innings, and he only used 19 pitches to do it. is it so out there to think it reasonable that he could throw 10-15 more and finish the game? i have a feeling that if Dusty had brought in another pitcher, many (likely myself included) would have criticized him for it.

“why is Dusty bringing Fisher/Masset/DRH in here? Lincoln is throwing rocks! he’s only thrown 19 pitches, why not let him go for the save? yeah, it’s a stupid stat to us, but i bet Lincoln would get a kick out of it.”

by Charlie Scrabbles on May 21, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think so

It’s not just the number of pitches. Sometimes it’s the rest period in between innings. And Lincoln has struggled before going multiple innings, so yeah, I think Dusty should have at least considered the possibility.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see Lincoln's stats with more than 1 IP this year.

I don’t remember him pitching badly any other time he pitched more than an inning, excluding yesterday of course.

"Red Reporter - An elitist clique full of like-minded douchebags." - BK

by ZJiff30 on May 21, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

He hasn't been so bad this year

But last year, it was a running joke – that Lincoln was only good for one term.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on May 21, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I totally think this was Baker's line of thinking

But I’m also willing to entertain the notion that he wanted to give the rest of his bullpen a rest and let Lincoln close the thing out. We do still have a lot of games coming in a row and using only two pitchers (Owings doesn’t count) would have been useful.

But you still can’t assume that Lincoln in his third inning is a sure thing.

by Brendanukkah on May 21, 2010 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dusty< Proactive

The 2010 Reds – "It could have been a lot worse"
by RedsMasochist on May 4, 2010 8:47 PM EDT

by Madville on May 21, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not every decision a manager makes is a smart or popular one. The unpopular decisions might actually work and they might not; they’re all a gamble. Dusty Baker shouldn’t be crucified for trying to do his job, no matter how much anyone thinks he sucks at it. I’ve never managed a baseball team, so I won’t criticize, and neither should anyone else.

Games like this happen to every team. Thursday’s loss was just that: ONE loss. The season still has 120 more games to go. It’s not the end of the world. Everyone can vent frustration all they want, but no one person was responsible for the loss.

On a side note, I think Molly Flogger gives us Braves fans a bad name.

The birth of Jason Heyward was God’s punishment for the sins of the people in New York and Philly.

by TonyAlmeyda on May 22, 2010 3:17 AM EDT reply actions  

I'll give you that Dusty shouldn't be crucified for doing his job.

But if he makes dumb decisions, it’s silly to say he shouldn’t be criticized just because he’s a manager, and I’m not. It’s Dusty’s responsibility to make decisions that will work more than they won’t over the length of the season. It’s true that this can’t be judged from this one game alone, but this game, I think, called into question Dusty’s ability to make in game decisions that are going to help the team in the long run.

As for Molly Flogger, don’t worry – we’ve all got them.

This team wouldn't be so bad if it weren't for all the losing.

by andromache on May 22, 2010 5:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

good reply

Dusty failed the most because he didn’t have anyone ready in the bullpen (he acknowledged this after the game). With a pitcher like Lincoln, you have to have someone ready after 3 innings. He could have had DRH ready, or Fisher. Not saying any of them would have prevented what happened, but they would have been ready to try and get hitters out. The point is, even if it was one loss, they don’t happen all the time. They almost never happen (I saw the stats on baseball tonight). When something that out of the ordinary happens, I think Brendanukkah figured out that we would have won that 998/1000. Questions need to be answered, or some decisions need to be evaluated after something that awful.

As for Molly Flogger, we don’t take that poster to be a good example of the Braves fan base, we have a couple of Braves posters who come here and are great.

by Red_Poodle on May 22, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Has anyone figured out why...

….we called up a reliever instead of a starter from AAA when Bailey went on the DL?

It is the soothing thing about history that it does repeat itself. -Gertrude Stein

by Travis Rehl on May 25, 2010 12:05 AM EDT reply actions  

EIther that or Lincoln's starting on Friday

This team wouldn't be so bad if it weren't for all the losing.

by andromache on May 25, 2010 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is why Dusty tried to stetch him out to three innings on Thursday

he was preparing for the inevitable injury, and wanted Lincoln to be ready to step into the rotation.

"Every day we expect to win and here lately we've been doing that."-Homer Bailey

by justin007000 on May 25, 2010 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or Micah!

Or Danny Ray!

"aaron harnann is so aweseom" - justin

by BK on May 25, 2010 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Cincinnati Reds. Community Guidlines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Long-hair-baseball-player_small
Red Reporter Field Trip: Taking in BP at GABP, but not with BP
Turtle17_small
The Draft: Reds all-time best, 1 through 40.
Anime_small
The Ranch (Bailey vs. Sale)
Anime_small
Rainy Sunday (Leake vs. Skaggs)
Mister_redlegs_hasaposse1_small
Requiem For Riverfront

Recent FanPosts

500x_custom_1271135923567_jaybruce_small
2012 Depth Concerns
1295279046-zack-morris-phone_small
Why Is Ryan Hanigan's Bat Wasted?
Herve_small
From The Opponent's Feed™: Not-a-Homer Simpson
Turtle17_small
The Draft: Richie Shaffer-3B-Clemson.
Rorschach_small_small
Sunday's Rockies game - Anyone here going?
1310_small
Pls Help Me Figure Out Who Signed This Ball
Anime_small
A Salami For Soto (Villareal vs. Cloyd)
Anime_small
Waiting here in Allentown... (Gallagher vs. Hyatt)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Yahoo_full_count

Bench Coaches

How-thomas-the-tank-engine-works-11_small BK

Ken_fish_called_wanda_small ken

Zombie-mlb_small Charlie Scrabbles

340x_charliesheen_small Kevin Mitchell is Batman

5851799_small FordhamRam

Lurch_small UncleWeez

Long-hair-baseball-player_small -ManBearPig

Nyc_small AC Slider

Beat Reporters

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Turtle17_small Thundering Turtle

Small riverfront76

Piñata_small kcgard2