For Your Consideration: A 2010 Depth Chart

Will Reds braintrust decide to drink the Hi-C?
After a lustrous winter of moderate-to-low interest in my ratings-challenged critical darling, Toward a 2010 Depth Chart series, I've culled the results into a final product. The following "is" an "optimized" 25 man roster, depth chart and lineup based on a synthesis of exhaustive Red Reporter polling, discussion and my own fillings-in of the gaps.
The biggest point of contention here is probably left field. Voting did not reflect the fact that most of Red Reporters core members would probably like to see Wlad get the bulk of starts at the outset of the 2010 season. However, I think there also may be an equal case to be made for Dickerson to start about 70% of the time, in which case either Johnny Gomes or Chris Heisey could start against lefties. The proposed roster below represents a third way, in which Heisey and Dickerson share left field. This compromise solution may not make the most sense from a developmental standpoint, but it would likely provide the best defense and on-base skills of all the possible permutations. It would also allow Wlad to fill the much-needed role of power bat off the bench.
My personal opinion is that given relative skill-sets and ceilings of the leftfield candidates, each of these three scenarios is acceptable in the short term - though the Reds should favor roster construction that puts a power bat who can hit lefties as at least a part-time bench option. Dickerson is the primary starter, but it could just as soon be Wlad I think.
So go ahead to strike up one of these two timely George Harrison-penned tunes:
"Tax Man"
"Here Comes the Sun"
Crack a RedLegg Ale (Too literal? and Is this a good beer even?), put some Skyline on the boil, light some incense in front of your lifesize Sean Casey door poster and kick back with this list of names of Reds players arranged in different configurations. Pitchers and catchers report in less than 48 hours, so time your overnight drunk in such a way that you end up miraculously in Goodyear AZ , unable to remember how you got there, but sufficiently buzzed and ready to fully appreciate Kip Wells long tossing to bullpen catcher Mike Stefanski.
25 Man Roster
Catchers:
Hanigan, Ryan
Hernadnez, Ramon
Infielders:
Cabrera, Orlando (SS)
Janish, Paul (SS)
Phillips, Brandon (2B)
Rolen, Scott (3B)
Sutton, Drew (UTL)
Votto, Joey (1B)
Outfielders:
Bruce, Jay (RF)
Stubbs, Drew (CF)
Dickerson, Chris (OF)
Heisey, Chris (OF)
Balentien, Wlad (LF/RF)
Starting Pitchers:
Arroyo, Bronson
Bailey, Homer
Cueto, Johnny
Harang, Aaron
Maloney, Matt
Relief Pitchers:
Burton, Jared
Cordero, Francisco
Fisher, Carlos
Herrera, Daniel R.
Masset, Nick
Owings, Micah
Rhodes, Arthur
Lineups
These were constructed using guidance from the lineup tool at Baseball Musings. The slash lines I'm using were made by triangulating CHONE, Fan projections and my own observational biases. I used platoon splits only for platoon players, with the exception of Jay Bruce. Either fulltime starters do not have serious splits, or consistency in lineups for regulars is probably about as important as micro lineup tweaking around the margins. Most important for the Reds, above going strictly by The Book , is to (1) put guys on base in front of Joey Votto, (2) play to the hitting strengths of Bruce, Phillips and Rolen. It's also worth considering how much elements like Cabrera's "bat control" should be weighed.
vs. RHP (Hanigan starting)
This lineup would used approximately 30% of the time
Chris Dickerson LF (.286/.385/.438)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. RHP: .292/.354/.552)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Orlando Cabrera (.274/.324/.376)
PITCHER
Ryan Hanigan (.266/.357/.369)
vs. RHP (Hernandez starting)
This lineup would be used approximately 30% of the time
Chris Dickerson LF (.286/.385/.438)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. RHP: .292/.354/.552)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Ramon Hernandez (.259/.327/.396)
PITCHER
Orlando Cabrera (.274/.324/.376)
vs LHP (Hanigan/Cabrera starting)
This lineup would be used approximately 5% of the time
Chris Heisey LF (vs LHP: .291/.368/.467)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. LHP: .268/.321/.492)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Orlando Cabrera (.274/.324/.376)
PITCHER
Ryan Hanigan (.266/.357/.369)
vs LHP (Hanigan/Janish starting)
This lineup would be used approximately 10% of the time
Chris Heisey LF (vs LHP: .291/.368/.467)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. LHP: .268/.321/.492)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Paul Janish (vs. LHP: .274/.338/.376)
PITCHER
Ryan Hanigan (.266/.357/.369)
vs LHP (Hernandez/Cabrera starting)
This lineup would be used approximately 5% of the time
Chris Heisey LF (vs LHP: .291/.368/.467)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. LHP: .268/.321/.492)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Ramon Hernandez (.259/.327/.396)
PITCHER
Orlando Cabrera (.274/.324/.376)
vs LHP (Herndandez/Janish starting)
This lineup would be used approximately 10% of the time
Chris Heisey LF (vs LHP: .291/.368/.467)
Drew Stubbs CF (.266/.335/.395)
Joey Votto 1B (.309/.394/.530)
Jay Bruce RF (vs. LHP: .268/.321/.492)
Scott Rolen (.277/.352/.431)
Brandon Phillips (.270/.326/.445)
Ramon Hernandez (.259/.327/.396)
PITCHER
Paul Janish (vs. LHP: .274/.338/.376)
Depth Chart
Ranked simply by MLB playing time share on Opening Day 2010
Catcher:
- Ryan Hanigan (50%)
- Ramon Hernandez (50%)
- Wilkin Castillo (DL, AAA)
- Corky MIller (AAA)
- Chris Denove (AAA)
First Base:
- Joey Votto (100%)
- Wladimir Balentien (back-up)
- Yonder Alonso (AAA)
- Kevin Barker (AAA)
- Wes Bankston (AAA)
Second Base:
- Brandon Phillips (100%)
- Drew Sutton (back-up)
- Todd Frazier (AAA)
- Paul Janish (back-up)
- Chris Valaika (AAA)
Shortstop:
- Orlando Cabrera (75%)
- Paul Janish (25% total PT, 20% start)
- Drew Sutton (back-up)
- Zack Cozart (AAA)
- Todd Frazier (AAA)
Third Base:
- Scott Rolen (95%)
- Drew Sutton (5%)
- Todd Frazier (AAA)
- Juan Francisco (AAA)
- Paul Janish (back-up)
Left Field:
- Chris Dickerson (vs. RHP)
- Chris Heisey (vs. LHP)
- Wladimir Balentien (occasional starter, back-up and PH)
- Todd Frazier (AAA)
- Jonny Gomes (Free Agent)
- Juan Francisco (AAA)
Center Field:
- Stubbs (90%)
- Dickerson (10%)
- Chris Heisey (back-up)
- Josh Anderson (AAA)
- Laynce Nix (AAA)
Right Field:
- Jay Bruce (95%)
- Wladimir Balentien (5%)
- Chris Heisey (back-up)
- Juan Francisco (AAA)
- Danny Dorn (AAA)
Starting rotation:
- Aaron Harang
- Bronson Arroyo
- Johnny Cueto
- Homer Bailey
- Matt Maloney (80%)
- Micah Owings (20%, spot starter)
- Justin Lehr (AAA)
- Travis Wood (AAA - Possible mid-season callup)
- Mike Leake (AA - Possible mid-season or September callup)
- Edinson Volquez (DL - possible September return)
- Aroldis Chapman (A+ - Possible September call-up)
- Sam Lecure (AAA)
- Matt Klinker (AAA)
- Alexander Smith (AA)
- Brad Boxberger (AA?)
Bullpen:
- Francisco Cordero
- Nick Masset
- Jared Burton
- Arthur Rhodes
- Danny Ray Herrera
- Micah Owings
- Carlos Fisher
- Pedro Viola
- Mike Lincoln (possible DL)
- Enerio Del Rosario (AAA)
- Logan Ondrusek (AAA)
- Kip Wells (AAA)
- Justin Lehr (AAA)
- Brad Boxberger (AA?)
- Phillipe Valiquette (AAA)
109 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Voted "No" b/c Drew Sutton's on the roster
And Laynce Nix is not
I don’t see Sutton making the 25 man out of camp. I do, however, see Nix on that roster.
Yep
I also see Gomes on that Roster
Wlad moved, traded or AAA
Will Hi-Z make the squad, if so he sits.
Frazier over Sutton
Sorry no way is Maloney the 5 SP
Lehr over Fischer
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
Hate to say it,
but we didn’t acquire Aaron Miles to DFA him or send him to AAA. If so, he’d have been dumped just like the A’s did with the Virus.
He’ll be on the roster.
Set the gearshift to the high gear of your soul.
by Kevin Mitchell is Batman on Feb 16, 2010 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
they may wait until after spring training
They’ve done that before.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
I dunno, I think Walt will give Miles the courtesy ST, and then DFA him
I don’t see Miles gracing the 25 man roster with his presence for Opening Day
by Highlifeman21 on Feb 16, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions
Aaron Miles sucks ass
DFA him. Piss.
"Life is good....life is good...life is good..life is good" jch
by obc2 on Feb 19, 2010 11:59 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dear God,
It’s jch. Yeah, I know we haven’t had the best of relationsh— Look, that chicken was asking for it, strutting around like it was the cock of the walk! Anyway, back to my question. If you’re as benevolent as everyone says you are, please let Aaron Miles make the 25 man roster of the Cincinnati Reds this year, and make sure he receives #23 to wear. This should be a piece of cake for a guy with you connections.
Love,
jch
"They're the ones that gave you the keys, they can’t get upset when you crash the car" -- 'tHan on my being a mod
by jch24 on Feb 20, 2010 9:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
you should have framed the differently
you were killing that chicken as an offering for God.
As an agnostic do I still capitalize “god” considering god is more of concept than a fact to me?
Volquez, Bailey, Cueto, Chapman, and Leake. The future is so bright I have to wear sunglasses.
by justin007000 on Feb 20, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
you two have a lot more in common than i thought
"Life is good....life is good...life is good..life is good" jch
Wlad can't be in AAA, he's out of options IIRC
I do not see Gomes as a Red, since it seems the best offer we’re making him is a minor league contract with a ST invite.
I agree that Maloney is not the 5th SP. The 5th SP will be Kip Wells.
I’d prefer Fisher over Lehr, since Lehr would really only be a long man and we have one of those already (Owings), whereas Fisher actually brings something to the table. I don’t think Lehr brings anything to the table.
by Highlifeman21 on Feb 16, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
My Roster is definately not my preferred roster
Its my best guess as to what Walt and Dudsy will come up with.
Wlad is out of options then I don’t see him as a Red..unless he rocks in ST and Gomes doesn’t sign.
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
I don't see another infielder on the ST invite list
with as much upside as Sutton that would also be acceptable to sit on the MLB bench this year. They may not have the nerve to dump Miles, but I think it would be wise. It also might not matter too much — and I’m pretty sure Sutton has an option.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions
Ahem, Miguel Cairo
I guess it’ll be a fight to the death between Sutton, Miles, Cairo, Valaika, Cozart and Chris Burke.
Aside from Cozart, that’s 1 big pile of yuck and suck.
by Highlifeman21 on Feb 17, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
I think you can strike Cozart and Valaika
from the list, they’re not going to be sitting the bench. Cairo is 35, so I don’t so a lot of upside there. If you’re putting him on the roster, you might as well keep Miles and not have to say you’re dumping $2.7MM.
Burke is coming up on 30, but he might still have potential for improvement. But I don’t see much point in having another weak-hitting SS on the roster when Janish plays better D and could probably get on base at about the same rate. Sutton’s advantage is that he can hit for a little power, enough to where he could still at least be a decent 2B-3B backup in the majors, with some breakout potential.
Where Sutton is 26, Miles is 33 – with a lifetime SLG of .356. If they’re carrying Janish – which they should – they ought to have another infielder with a little pop, rather than one who might have roughly the same offensive profile (and a worse season at the plate last year) and far inferior defense.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
Also, looking back at your original roster proposal...
I think we’ll see END instead of Heisey, which then allows the possibility of Sutton, although Sutton would truly be the 25th man on the roster.
If Heisey makes the team out of ST, then I think END makes the roster instead of Sutton.
But I really don’t think Heisey will make the roster just to ride pine.
by Highlifeman21 on Feb 17, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
Neither will Juan Francisco
My roster would have Heisey playing 30%-40% of the time and END playing fulltime in Louisville to start the year. I’m not in love with a LF platoon, but I don’t think it’s any worse than Wlad starting fulltime or Gomes and C-Dick platooning. Heisey is definitely good at hitting lefties. It makes the most developmental sense to keep him in AAA – but at the risk of sounding like a broken record, he’s too old to worry a whole lot a bout that. I don’t think he gets the same “full time or bust” treatment that Alonso should get. His transformation into a top prospect has been a windfall for the Reds and, given their logjam, they need to start putting some of these guys to the test very soon or trading them while the stock is high or they get “exposed.”
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
What's the reasoning behind that move?
Why has LaRussa done it in the past, and why’s it being suggested here? This seems like something I should already know, but I don’t.
by the finest muffins on Feb 16, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
Lineup optimization metrics
Have suggested that batting the pitcher 8th maximizes run production.
by Brendanukkah on Feb 16, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions
I wonder if that's why LaRuss does it, though
He may have his own reasons.
The Pirates have done it as well.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
LaRussa first did it when McGwire was in St. Louis
he wanted a “Second leadoff hitter” in the 9th spot so there would be more people on base when McGwire came up to bat.
by justin007000 on Feb 16, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting.
Couldn’t you make the argument that it’s not much different from batting McGwire 4th and just putting your #9 guy in the 1 or 2 spot? I mean, after the first inning, it’s just a loop, right? If anything, this seems more likely to give the pitcher’s spot more at-bats overall… ooh, which might be the reason it works, because if you double switch, your pinch-hitter types get more at-bats than your #8 hitter, who’s probably pretty weak anyway… [yikes. raving now. lineup construction confuses me.]
Anyway, I’m curious why these “optimization metrics” found that this kind of lineup was effective. I probably wouldn’t understand such an explanation, but my interest is piqued.
by the finest muffins on Feb 16, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions
JinAZ
explains it a bit here.
And there’s a lineup construction tool here. Plug in each players OBP and SLG, and it will generate the ideal lineup for you.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
yeah i just plugged in fake stats
with what seemed like a responsible lineup for a major league team. The best lineup averages to score 4.427 runs/game and the worst lineup scores 4.035 runs/game.
So the best lineup would score about 717 runs a season and the worst lineup would score 653 runs a season, creating a 6 win difference. But you have to assume the worst lineups include the pitcher leading off, and what not, and most managers will not construct the very worst lineup, so within what would be considered acceptable lineups, it will probably only be a 2 or 3 win difference.
by justin007000 on Feb 17, 2010 12:53 AM EST up reply actions
and that's why they say
Lineups really don’t matter that much.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
Yeah
I don’t think it’s possible for Dusty to do anything too egregious on that front. However, if you eek out a win or two for free, throught lineup optimization when they cost $4MM or so on the free agent, you oughtta do it.
The only really objectionable thing Dusty’ll probably do is bat Cabrera #2 or Hernandez #5. It’s kinda boneheaded not to set up the lineup so that you maximize Votto’s likelihood to hit with runners on, putting your highest OBP 1-2 and sticking Hanigan, Janish or Cabrera in the 9-hole.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
Hanigan and Jannish will be in the dugout hole this season.
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
Where he'll be pricking
the hell out of an Orlando Cabrera voodoo doll.
Please have your way with the above double-entendre!
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks
I understood a little of that—the explanations at the end are the kind of stats talk I can at least partially digest. It’s been way too long since I’ve done advanced math, though. I swear I used to know what a coefficient was.
by the finest muffins on Feb 17, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
Trust me if i can understand it so can you
The highest high school math class I took was algebra II, and I took intro stats as an undergrad and got a C in it.
by justin007000 on Feb 17, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
quit bragging for God's sake
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
Math is easy until they start adding letters?
"aaron harnann is so aweseom" - justin
by BK on Feb 17, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 8 recs
Take a bow, sir
"They're the ones that gave you the keys, they can’t get upset when you crash the car" -- 'tHan on my being a mod
Hitting McGwire 3rd instead of 4th was designed to give him more plate appearances
About 18 (162/9) over the course of a season.
Is that why we bat our poor-hitting shortstops 2nd?
So they can get more plate appearances?
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 17, 2010 6:22 PM EST up reply actions
What's with the quotes around "acquired" in the Hanley Ramirez option?
Are you planning a kidnapping? A hostage situation? If so, I may have to vote for that option. Whatever my role in the adventure, I’d like to have a walkie-talkie, please.
by the finest muffins on Feb 16, 2010 11:02 PM EST reply actions
Request granted
We’ll also be wearing these:

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 10:52 AM EST up reply actions
Wearing nothing?
I’m happy to take part in the abduction, but I’m gonna need something to clip my walkie talkie to.
"They're the ones that gave you the keys, they can’t get upset when you crash the car" -- 'tHan on my being a mod
It totally displayed itself in the preview

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
I'm rec'ing that reference
Best Wes Anderson movie!
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
Meh
I’d probably put Rushmore behind Tenenbaums, and maybe even Fantastic Mr. Fox.
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
tenenbaums
is the Wily Taveras of movies, IMO
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand
How many gloves are in the movie?
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 17, 2010 8:35 PM EST up reply actions
srsly?
i feel like we’ve had this conversation before, but huh?
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 17, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions
And a nickname is born
What flavor of Hi-C was your favorite? I liked the Ghostbusters flavor with Slimer on the can. Ectocooler, I think it was called.
I really like that Slimer's mouth is thinking "Ecto Cooler" rather than saying it.
Calmer than you are.
by 3 Fast 3 Furious on Feb 17, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
...and that his mouth-thought "ecto-cooler" is trademarked
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 17, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
it's a molecule
not a planet. duh.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 17, 2010 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
I actually think its an orange
"And then there was the USAID guy in Kandahar who drove a giant pink Cadillac, which the locals set on fire one day. If you wanted to destroy something symbolic during a riot, you just could not do better than that. Good stuff." - Ghosts of Alexander
look, dammit
there’s a little divot on the top of the orange, where there’s a stem that connects it to the tree. Molecules and planets don’t have stems.
"And then there was the USAID guy in Kandahar who drove a giant pink Cadillac, which the locals set on fire one day. If you wanted to destroy something symbolic during a riot, you just could not do better than that. Good stuff." - Ghosts of Alexander
what do you know about molecules and planets?
obviously not as much as you think you do, Mr. Scientist.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 17, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions
/creation museum'ed
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 18, 2010 1:58 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I was gonna post that...
but then I saw it was 41.49 KB. :P
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 18, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions
but shortstop won't come back
if we keep making fun of the creation museum.
Volquez, Bailey, Cueto, Chapman, and Leake. The future is so bright I have to wear sunglasses.
by justin007000 on Feb 18, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions
Really...Well this is much a poke a Darwin as the CM.
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
/pluto'ed
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 17, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
Psssh
What do you know about Slimer anatomy? His brain could easily be in his mouth.
by the finest muffins on Feb 17, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
Rita Hayworth's heart was in her mouth
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
So was Sinatra's penis
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
by Madville on Feb 17, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
TWSS
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
by Madville on Feb 17, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, TWSS.
But we couldn’t understand her, because she was “being frank.”
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 17, 2010 6:25 PM EST up reply actions
more like being Franked
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
It's possible Slimer
had an anatomy similar to Crang’s. All (and thereby none) is brain.

Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
I'm kind of in love with that shirt
Shave my head and beard, get some funky glasses, and ta-da! Halloween costume!
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
Halloween?
dude, that’s cool enough to be in the weekly rotation.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 17, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
Oh ok
I thought he was puking out Ecto-Cooler, while simulatenously pouring it down his gullet. Suggesting he was a latter-day Epicurean – hecouldn’t get enough of the stuff and was drinking it faster than his body could process, though making it possible for him to exist in a state of perpetual Hi-C binge. Just shows how stupid I was when I was 7.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't see how anyone could disagree.
Chris “Ecto Cooler” Heisey
"aaron harnann is so aweseom" - justin
by BK on Feb 17, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
We're predicting he'll be a little green in spring training?
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
I think the tigrmetricians are predicting him to be sweet and delicious this season
"aaron harnann is so aweseom" - justin
Jonny Weird
/fix’d
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle
Loved the drink
Love the nickname. I think I also had a day-glo Slimer t-shirt.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Feb 17, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
If he platoons...
…they’ll have to be careful not to cross the streams.
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 17, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
imagine every molecule in your body suddenly exploding at the speed of light
ok, that’s bad.
"The USA despite its flaws and corruption and overall messiness is still a great and powerful instrument of freedom and hope for the entire world." - Madville
Kinda like rolling a strike in ' cosmic bowling'
BTW the BAMM team took 4 out of 7 points tonight.
Your humble RR representative did his best:
212
183
200
BAMM clings to 3rd place…damn handicap bowling…
I force my self to go every week

'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
It's one wise crack after another at the bowling alley!
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 18, 2010 1:59 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Bowling family fun and
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!
Sums up my life.
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
by Madville on Feb 18, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
/pinch hit Juan Castro for Josh Hamilton'ed
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 18, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
Important safety tip. Thanks Egon.
by Immaculate Concepcion on Feb 18, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Hi, hello, and welcome
Nice handle.
"aaron harnann is so aweseom" - justin
by BK on Feb 18, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Rec'd just for the nick
"They're the ones that gave you the keys, they can’t get upset when you crash the car" -- 'tHan on my being a mod
yes, I saw that had been created and I eagerly anticipate the person's first post so that I could rec the name
Welcome!
Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter
shouldnt you be writing chapters 7-14?!?
"Life is good....life is good...life is good..life is good" jch
we're not writing them in order
I wrote chapter 11 yesterday. John wrote chapter 2. Eight down. Six to go.
Red Reporter or follow on Twitter: @redreporter
Bankrupt already?
Volquez, Bailey, Cueto, Chapman, and Leake. The future is so bright I have to wear sunglasses.
by justin007000 on Feb 20, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Are you related to Davey?
'The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there."
Sarah Palin
welcome and junk
What did you expect? It's the internet. Some of us are full of crap.
by PeteyHendrix on Feb 18, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions





























