Compare & Contrast: A superficial glance at Left Field
Position: Left Field
2010 Innings breakdown: Jonny Gomes - 71%
Laynce Nix - 19%
Chris Heisey - 7%
Chris Dickerson - 2%
Jim Edmonds - 1%
Willie Bloomquist - 1%
2010 Composite batting line (over 650 PA):
|
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
CS |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
|
584 |
83 |
157 |
29 |
4 |
19 |
86 |
5 |
3 |
46 |
144 |
.268 |
.329 |
.431 |
.760 |
|
BABIP |
Contact Rate |
Walk Rate |
Batting Eye |
SBO |
RC/G |
|
.327 |
75.3% |
7.0% |
0.32 |
5.8% |
4.68 |
2010 Composite NL average left field batting line (over 650 PA):
|
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
CS |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
|
579 |
81 |
154 |
35 |
4 |
17 |
76 |
9 |
3 |
58 |
119 |
.267 |
.337 |
.434 |
.771 |
|
BABIP |
Contact Rate |
Walk Rate |
Batting Eye |
SBO |
RC/G |
|
.309 |
79.4% |
8.9% |
0.49 |
7.7% |
4.89 |
2011 Contract status:
Gomes - $1.75M team option
Nix - free agent
Heisey - not yet arbitration eligible
Dickerson - with Milwaukee
Edmonds - free agent
Bloomquist - free agent
Advanced minor league depth:
Todd Frazier - age 24, 781 OPS at AAA
Sean Henry - age 24, 766 OPS at AA, AAA
Relative win increase, 2010 vs. 2009: -0
Brief summary of 2010: In 2009, Laynce Nix was the most frequent name assigned to the LF position in the lineup card, but fielded less than 40% of the season's innings in that position. This year, the team took a large step forward in terms of stability-reference Jonny Gomes's healthy lead in innings played-but didn't make any gains in production over the prior year. While Gomes had his moments, Red Reporter's award-winning 18 Game Capsule series tells us that 5 of the season's 9 periods witnessed Gomes posting an OPS under 700. It's completely hit or miss for the guy, and as much as anyone in the lineup, he dictated whether the team had a dominant or a shaky offense.
Way too early knee-jerk outlook for 2011: Theoretically, there should be no easier position to upgrade; the current group represents a below average effort, and there will be dramatic upgrades available in the winter. All it costs is money which does not belong to us. Realistically, most of the team's LF innings in 2011 are likely to be given to someone already listed above. Jonny Gomes has played several seasons now, but prior to 2010 never received more than 385 at-bats. This year, he beat that previous high by 126 at-bats, but only hit 18 home runs, which would rank as the 4th seasonal total in Gomes's career. This in a ballpark which collects home runs by the bushel. Similarly, Laynce Nix hit but four dingers in 165 at-bats. On one hand, throw in Heisey, and the group gave average production on the cheap. On the other hand, their collective defense is poor, the team shouldn't be content with matching league averages, and in the case of the two primary players, it sure feels like the league's pitchers have got the pairing figured out. If the Reds fill the position in a similar manner next year, I expect overall LF OPS totals to be under 700. If this sounds low, try to find another slow outfielder with declining power and three times as many strikeouts as walks while managing to hit as high as .266. Course correction city.
Bottom line: As mentioned before, this is a relatively easy upgrade. While I fully expect the team to re-load for 2011 with the same group, and while I fully expect that strategy to yield poor results, I also think the results will be so bad, that team management will have their hand forced, and upgrade the spot by the end of May. That could mean Heisey or Frazier, might mean a permanent position change for Yonder Alonso, or might mean a trade. I hold on to hope that the team will veer from the conventional wisdom and be aggressive in the free agent market. Speculative Buy. Share prices are low, and while rumors of a future spin-off/IPO may be overblown, the winds of change are near. Buying into emerging markets is never without risk, so keep a balanced portfolio, but there is significant upside to be had.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i get the sense that LF is going to look very different next season
maybe im just too confident in Walt, but i dont think he’s going to stand for this kind of production.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 1, 2010 10:59 AM EDT reply actions
I agree. I kind of get the feeling that he didn't intend for Gomes to get this many PAs, esp. against righties
I’d think that, in the name of further Dusty-proofing the roster, that Walt tries to find a good left-handed left fielder to at least platoon.
It’s interesting, because the way riverfront puts it in this post, I kinda think the Gomes option is a no-brainer in that it shouldn’t be picked up.
see what I did there with uzr? it’s like a LOL cats saber-pun combo.--Verka Serduchka
the only way to Dusty-proof the roster
is to get rid of Gomes.
But everyone seems to think the Reds are going to keep him around.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
the only way to dusty proof the roster
is to get rid of dusty
by vottomatic on Nov 1, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I get a different feeling
The difference between what Dusty thinks is right and what Walt thinks is going to create some tension.
by GlennBraggsSwingAndMissBrokenBat on Nov 1, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions
wouldn't it be worth it tho
imagine the lineup of ellsbury, BP, votto, rolen, bruce, stubbs, lowrie, and hernanigans
eh
I think Ellsbury’s overrated.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
over rated??
a 26 year old with a career 291/344/405 who has 70 steals in one year and 50 in another sounds not too shabby to me. i think he is alot like stubbs. just less power and slightly more obp and steals
well
I wouldn’t trade Leake, Alonso, END, Sappelt, and Maloney for Stubbs, either, even though I’m probably his biggest fan here.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
*ahem*
"And then there was the USAID guy in Kandahar who drove a giant pink Cadillac, which the locals set on fire one day. If you wanted to destroy something symbolic during a riot, you just could not do better than that. Good stuff." - Ghosts of Alexander
I've been stalking Stubby since he was in A-ball, newb!

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
Neat caption.
Is Jonny talking to Heisey, or the ball though?
Set the gearshift to the high gear of your soul.
by Kevin Mitchell is Batman on Nov 1, 2010 1:04 PM EDT reply actions
and he's about to elbow through Gomes
"And then there was the USAID guy in Kandahar who drove a giant pink Cadillac, which the locals set on fire one day. If you wanted to destroy something symbolic during a riot, you just could not do better than that. Good stuff." - Ghosts of Alexander
I'm surprised this many of you think its going to get even worse
that’s what “strong sell” means, right?
"And then there was the USAID guy in Kandahar who drove a giant pink Cadillac, which the locals set on fire one day. If you wanted to destroy something symbolic during a riot, you just could not do better than that. Good stuff." - Ghosts of Alexander
I still don't get the options, which is why I haven't voted on any of these yet.
But I thought “strong sell” meant “it’s better to sell than to buy or hold, but at least you’re selling high,” whereas “weak sell” meant “you better sell because you really don’t want to buy or hold, but… yikes, you’re not going to get much.”
I’m probably completely wrong, though.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
you buy if you think the current option's performance next year will be better than this year
you sell if you think the current option’s performance next year will be worse than this year
you hold if you think it will be pretty much the same
weak or strong just relates to how much better/worse you think the positions performance will be
so if you think gomes will be absolutely terrible next year and he wont be able to pull off the mediocre year he had this year again. you have a strong sell. but if you think he will be better next year than he was this year then you buy
Or if you think the Reds are going to ultimately get better production
out of LF, you buy, regardless of whom it comes from.
I thought I understood what vottomatic wrote, but this confuses me again.
I’d have thought if you think you can get better production, you sell what you currently have so you can buy that better option.
Ugh. My mind does not handle abstractions like this well.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not hard
if you think LF will see better production in 2011, you buy LF (if it’s on the way up, you wanna buy now). If you think it’ll be worse, you sell (vice-versa).
The stock in question is the Reds LF position. If it’s improving, you wanna buy it now. Jonny Gomes (or any individual player) is not the stock.
I hate this voting system
Because nobody agrees on what it means.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
That makes sense, thank you!
But saying it’s “not hard” isn’t cool. It actually is difficult for me (and clearly not just me, judging by the many confused comments.) You feel dumb enough for not understanding something. Having someone else say “but, it’s easy” doesn’t make it any easier. It just makes you feel dumber. This is like high school physics class all over again. Stupid torque.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry
didn’t mean to come across that way at all. And I’m a HS teacher at an all-girls school, so I ought to be keenly aware of these kinds of speaking mishaps.
You’re right, no one agrees what they mean.
It's all good.
Your teacherliness showed through on that explanation. ’Twas helpful.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Alternatively:
“It’s not hard” —> TWSS
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions
That makes sense, thank you!
But saying it’s “not hard” isn’t cool. It actually is difficult for me (and clearly not just me, judging by the many confused comments.) You feel dumb enough for not understanding something. Having someone else say “but, it’s easy” doesn’t make it any easier. It just makes you feel dumber. This is like high school physics class all over again. Stupid torque.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
torque
Hee. I found that really confusing in high school, but caught on college, and really loved physics after that.
As for the voting system…I think it’s pretty clear everyone’s interpreting it differently, just from the wacked-out results. We might as well all be voting “boobs.”
Some are voting “sell” because they think Gomes sucks. Some are voting “buy” because they want the Reds to go out and buy someone other than Gomes. Some are voting “buy” because they think Gomes will be better next year. Some are voting “buy” because they think the Reds will go out and get someone better.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
women? talking physics??
NOW ive seen EVERYthing on RR!
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 1, 2010 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions
stick it up the old z-axis
and apply a torque!
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 1, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
i never took a physics class
ever. so i have no idea what you are talking about. im going to assume that you are delighted to talk to me, and that you want me to have a nice evening.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 1, 2010 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions
well
Some would considered a nice evening, I’m sure. ;-)
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
I don't understand this
but I’m rec’ing it anyway, because it sounds clever.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
So I was right.
I’m completely wrong.
by the finest muffins on Nov 1, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
























