Baseball Writers Brace for the End
An article from the Wall St. Journal:
As Newspapers Cut Back, Press Boxes Grow Lonelier; How a Venerable Institution Lost Its Way
Baseball's independent press corps, once the most powerful in American sports, is fading. As newspapers cut budgets and payrolls, the press boxes at major league ballparks are becoming increasingly lonely places, signaling a future when some games may be chronicled only by wire services, house organs and Web writers watching the games on television.
"I certainly recognize where things are going," says Jack O'Connell, secretary of the Baseball Writers Association of America, the venerable 101-year-old membership organization for the profession. "I certainly see the dark clouds."
It's not clear how many newspaper beat writers and columnists will vanish. Some major dailies in baseball towns like Boston and New York say so long as they exist, they will never stop covering their teams. Online-only sources have filled some of the void, and independent Web sites have popped up where fans gather to comment on the games as they happen. In many ways, baseball writers are no different than other professionals whose industries are being shrunk.
...The changing world was on vivid display recently at McKechnie Field in Bradenton, Fla., the spring home of the Pittsburgh Pirates. Opened in 1923 during the golden age of sportswriting, it held its first-ever night game last March -- 20 years after the lights first went on over Chicago's Wrigley Field. At a March 22 game between the Pirates and the Cincinnati Reds two writers from Pittsburgh papers were in attendance, along with two reporters from Major League Baseball's Web site. The Pittsburgh chapter of the BBWAA is down to nine members, an all time low, from 20 in 1988.
The Beaver County Times, outside Pittsburgh, has stopped covering spring training and won't cover every Pirates home game -- primarily due to finances, according to sports editor Ed Rose. To some, it's inevitable that more papers will follow suit. "We're waiting for that first domino to fall, for that first major newspaper not covering its team on the road," says current BBWAA president David O'Brien.
Will we miss baseball writers when they're gone? We really don't need newspapers for the box scores, or even accounts of what happened on the field. With sites like Fangraphs, MLB's own Internet coverage, and bloggers who describe the games as seen on TV or from the park, we can generally follow what happened.
What we lose with the beat writers is the view from inside the locker room. Beat writers develop a relationship with the players over the long season, and have access and insight a blogger can't hope to match. There are the radio and TV reporters, of course, but with their time constraints, they generally don't provide the kind of in-depth reporting the print media does.
Newspapers are dropping like flies. Declaring bankruptcy, going web-only, folding altogether. Among the troubled papers: the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Chicago Sun-Times, the Detroit News, the Detroit Free-Press, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the Boston Globe, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Rocky Mountain News, Christian Science Monitor. And of course, the Cincinnati Post went under in 2007.
The bad economy is exacerbating the problem, but this is deeper than the economy, as this essay points out:
Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable
It argues that what we are facing is as fundamental a change as the invention of the printing press. Though we know what the world was like before the printing press, and what it was like afterward, what's really interesting is the transition. That is what we are living through now. And if the previous transition is any model, we can expect this one to be chaotic. In the end, something will replace newspapers, but from where we are now, it's impossible to know what. We won't know the turning point when it happens; it will be clear only in the rear-view mirror.
During the wrenching transition to print, experiments were only revealed in retrospect to be turning points. Aldus Manutius, the Venetian printer and publisher, invented the smaller octavo volume along with italic type. What seemed like a minor change — take a book and shrink it — was in retrospect a key innovation in the democratization of the printed word. As books became cheaper, more portable, and therefore more desirable, they expanded the market for all publishers, heightening the value of literacy still further.
That is what real revolutions are like. The old stuff gets broken faster than the new stuff is put in its place. The importance of any given experiment isn’t apparent at the moment it appears; big changes stall, small changes spread. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen. Agreements on all sides that core institutions must be protected are rendered meaningless by the very people doing the agreeing. (Luther and the Church both insisted, for years, that whatever else happened, no one was talking about a schism.) Ancient social bargains, once disrupted, can neither be mended nor quickly replaced, since any such bargain takes decades to solidify.
In the end, we'll get our baseball coverage somehow. But it could suck to be a baseball writer in the immediate future.
A couple of other links related to baseball economics...
The Reds may not have set a new record low in attendance, but the Jays did:
Baseball for peanuts: ballpark deals
...At different stadiums this week, there were worrisome indicators. In Toronto, for example, the Blue Jays played to a nearly packed house on Opening Day, which usually happens. But the next day, nearly three-quarters of the seats at Rogers Centre were empty -- low even for an April game. Part of the reason was a one-game ban on the sale of alcohol, which was punishment for unruly fan behavior on Opening Day.
The Budweiser was flowing again for Game 3 of the series against the Detroit Tigers -- and attendance fell even more, to barely 12,000, the lowest gate ever at Rogers Centre. If beer doesn't put bellies in the seat, you know you have a problem.
And on a lighter note...
Bernie Madoff's Mets tickets are for sale on eBay
Seats 5-6 in the eighth row in section 11, just to the home plate side of the New York Mets' dugout, are being sold by the trustee overseeing the liquidation of Madoff's businesses.
Here's the actual eBay auction. They're up to $2,297.00 now.
If you can't make it to opening day, more of Bernie's baseball tickets will be auctioned in the future.
0 recs |
33 comments
Comments
if teh fay gets the can then what will teh fay's editor do?
"I never use a big word when a diminutive one will work." — Pete Mackanin.
by joshuar9476 on Apr 10, 2009 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Edit Justin's history papers?
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Apr 10, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i hope so
my girlfriend has no interest in reading my 50 page masters thesis…
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions!"- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert DFA.
by justin007000 on Apr 11, 2009 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What we lose with the beat writers is the view from inside the locker room. Beat writers develop a relationship with the players over the long season, and have access and insight a blogger can’t hope to match. There are the radio and TV reporters, of course, but with their time constraints, they generally don’t provide the kind of in-depth reporting the print media does.
I question the value of this. I can see why relationships with the front office or manager are important to reporting, but the typical player post-game quote adds nothing to my understanding or appreciation. Every once in a while they’re entertaining, but it’s nothing Jim Day can’t get. Access to injury information is a little more valuable, and that is something a good beat writer can provide. But those stories and developments will break eventually anyways. So overall I don’t see a big loss if the paper declines to assign a beat writer to the local team.
I’ve read that Clay Shirky article, and it’s very good. I think newspapers can survive if they focus on local news and outsource coverage of national/international news. For sports, this means culling the wires for articles about the local pro teams and paying a young writer to report on the HS and college games, which nobody else will cover. Ditch the movie critic. Have good reporters covering the local business and government beat. If you combine all that you have a product that a blog won’t be able to match.
The other potential savings is ditching paper altogether. As the article points out, the printing presses are incredibly expensive. Once you account for the cost of the press, paper, ink, and home delivery, the newspaper costs more than the subscription price. If papers can eliminate paper, and figure out a way to make some small amount of money from readers, then I think they can live with the depressed ad revenues that are now the reality. How they do that is of course the big question.
- – - -
The Budweiser was flowing again for Game 3 of the series against the Detroit Tigers — and attendance fell even more, to barely 12,000
No wonder. They can’t cut a deal with Molson?
by ken on Apr 10, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I mostly agree
Except with this part:
I can see why relationships with the front office or manager are important to reporting, but the typical player post-game quote adds nothing to my understanding or appreciation.
The post-game player quote is what you get from TV. Those are usually pretty insipid.
What I’m talking about is more subtle, and longer-term. The things that let you get to know a player a little, and get a glimpse inside the locker room.
For example, Pete Abe once wrote about how Jorge Posada weighs each of his bats when he gets a new shipment. If the weight is off by even a fraction of an ounce, he sends it back. Yes, he has a scale in his locker. Other players like to use it, and he lets them…if they pay 25 cents a shot. That just cracks me up. Posada makes millions, and he charges people a quarter to use his scale.
The Yankees writer for my local paper is often surprisingly blunt. He once wrote a detailed description of how weird Kyle Farnsworth is, and how he didn’t fit in with the rest of the team. You’d never hear that on TV…even if everyone is thinking it.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Apr 10, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hip Hip Jorge
also uses his scale in his coke and heroin operation.
…. gotta look ahead to the future after your baseball career is over…
by Highlifeman21 on Apr 10, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with BF
I think the beat writer is a thing we will still find valuable, if only as a jumping off point for our discussions on baseball. How many times a day does RR link to Fay?
It’s the big money sports opinion writers that are the woolly mammoths here IMO. They make big money and don’t seem to offer much that I can’t find on RR or other places.
In fact, I’m a little curious as to why the article seems to set up a necessary distinction between “bloggers” and “beat reporters.” It seems to me that the next beat reporters will just be exclusively bloggers like Trent and Fay. There won’t be a need for as many, but we’ll still want them.
Will you stop it with the vegetables
by Man Mountain on Apr 11, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Muddy syntax
I didn’t mean to say that Fay is exclusively a blogger now, but that he probably will be rather soon (God help us).
Will you stop it with the vegetables
by Man Mountain on Apr 11, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Things are gonna change but in the end fans will have at least as much of what they have now.
Insert gathering-storm-hard-rain’s-gonna-fall-life-flowers-anew metaphor here.
But I guess the WSJ is looking at things from the perspective of the writers, editors, advertisers and publishers.
"What wrath, Daddy?"
by Fat Vegas Alan on Apr 11, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem
is payment. Right now, most bloggers do it in their spare time. Fay is not earning money via blogging, he’s been paid by the newspaper and blogs as a sort of sideline. Even the most devoted blogger is not going to be able to follow the Reds across the country like Deadheads did the Grateful Dead on his own dime.
A few bloggers earn enough from their blog ads to support themselves, but it’s very few, and you have to wonder how sustainable that will be.
Then there’s the idea of charging for access to a blog. But the basic problem remains: information wants to be free. With a few exceptions (described in the “Thinking the Unthinkable” link posted up top), people won’t pay for Internet content.
If, say, MLB required every player to keep a blog, and charged for access, some would pay. But most people wouldn’t. Instead, one person would pay $1 for access to Darnell McDonald’s blog, find out what the heck he was thinking letting Ryan Church’s fly ball drop in, and tell everyone, “He says he didn’t realize the wind would carry it that much.”
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Apr 11, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can see a future
where advertisers ramp up their support of blogs to a point where blogging would be a sustainable enterprise. once the newspapers and all their Jay Mariotti-dinosaurs die off, there will have to be something to fill the vacuum. and as MM already pointed out, those guys are already here. it’s just a matter of making it worth their while.
My millions are unconventional!
by Charlie Scrabbles on Apr 11, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem isn't lack of support
It’s that Internet advertising doesn’t work all that well. If it worked better, they would pay more. But people generally ignore online ads, or even use Ad-Block to get rid of them.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Apr 11, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
but when advertisers cant advertise in newspapers, they will go for the next best thing.
My millions are unconventional!
by Charlie Scrabbles on Apr 11, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which probably isn't blogs
Internet ad revenue is still growing, but the main driver is search engine ads. They tend to be tightly targeted, and catch people who are actually planning to buy something.
Probably the only ads I’ve ever clicked on have been at Google. If I’m looking to buy something, why not click on an ad if it comes up while I’m searching? I generally don’t even see banner ads, at blogs or anywhere else, because of Ad-Block. And if I did see them, I would never click on them.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Apr 11, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jch'd
Made from 100% recycled awesome,
by chandrathan on Apr 11, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think more blogs
will do some long form video podcasting and sell 20-30 second ad spots.
Will you stop it with the vegetables
by Man Mountain on Apr 11, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think other sources can serve as the jumping off points,
whether it’s a Mark Sheldon story, C Trent’s blog, a Will Carroll Unfiltered post, etc. We link a lot to Fay because we’re fanatics. Most Reds fans don’t obsess over roster minutiae or trade rumors quite like we do.
by ken on Apr 11, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Posada charging a quarter to use his scale
It’s the prinicipality of the matter, Smokey!
I miss the old days of the internet when men were men, hot girls were middle aged men, and hot underage girls were FBI agents.....
by jch24 on Apr 13, 2009 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I keep saying this...
but last year in Toronto, beers were $9.25.
Who can afford to get drunk on $9.25 beers?
We want to build long period of time. I didn’t come here for the shot run.
by Gray on Apr 11, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hear that, Slyde
You could get drunk at a Blue Jays game for only $4.62!
Will you stop it with the vegetables
by Man Mountain on Apr 11, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
believe it or not
not everyone in this country has internet. paper papers are still necessary.
by Daedalus on Apr 11, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bill James's point is
That is about to change too. If netbooks cost under $400 now, I would imagine in 10 years you could get a similar machine for $99, and by that point wireless will be more readily available as well. And even of the people who don’t have the internet, almost everyone in the country has a TV. The vast majority of people still get news from the TeeVee. Unfortunately, most TV news programs are nothing more than extended infomercials.
by teb7 on Apr 12, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
to your point
at&t is now going to be offering a $50 netbook. I imagine it won’t be long until you can get it for free with a contract.
Made from 100% recycled awesome,
by chandrathan on Apr 12, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
People Don't Kill People. Burning Couches Kill People.
by crolfer on Apr 12, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With 10 minutes of Weather and 30 seconds of sports coverage..
Education is what you get from reading the directions. Experience is what you get from not reading them.
by snohio on Apr 13, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the non-interneters aren't a commercially viable market
and will continue to be less and less viable, especially if municipalities decide to provide low-cost internet access. Philadelphia has been unsuccessfully trying to do this for a few years, and a few smaller cities have pulled it off. On a grander scale, Australia plans on building a nation wide high-speed network. Actually, I think this would be a great use of stimulus funds.
The issue isn’t whether paper is still necessary, it’s whether a paper paper can continue to operate without getting in line for TARP funds.
by ken on Apr 12, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Print is dead -
I have nothing more to say on that subject.
Its probably going to happen - bend over
by Madville on Apr 10, 2009 11:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
![]()
"Like I always tell people, I'm a baseball player, it's what I do." - Jonny Gomes, Free Agent
by PeteyHendrix on Apr 11, 2009 3:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't had a Molson in awhile.
Isn’t it pretty much on par with Budweiser?
And FWIW, I’m pretty much okay with that new Budweiser American Ale thingy. Y’know, the one with the eagle on the no-gloss paper packaging. Better than Bud but not quite as yummy as Sam’s.
"What wrath, Daddy?"
by Fat Vegas Alan on Apr 11, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Selling bid = $7500
One game… Just wow..
Education is what you get from reading the directions. Experience is what you get from not reading them.
by snohio on Apr 13, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Today's NY Times
Be a part of the problem or a part of the solution…Eric Schmidt president of Google says:
(the) Web is in danger of becoming a wasteland as reporting attenuates. "Let me just say precisely: It’s a sewer out there,"
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13carr.html?ref=todayspaper
As I said print (as we’ve known it) is dead.
Its probably going to happen - bend over
by Madville on Apr 13, 2009 6:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















