From the New York Times' Freakonomics feature:
"Here’s my favorite new fact about N.C.A.A. basketball: teams that are behind by one point at halftime are actually more likely to win than teams that are one point ahead. This striking finding comes courtesy of a terrific new paper by my Wharton colleagues, Jonah Berger and Devin Pope. Their findings are summarized in this graph, which collects info from 6,572 N.C.A.A. basketball games since 2005."
8 months ago
Fat Vegas Alan
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
For you, Slyde.
"I accidently put the night light in the washing machine."
by Fat Vegas Alan on Mar 17, 2009 9:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Man, I read one chapter in freakonomics and it really pissed me off.
“Some people say gun control caused the decrease in crime, but that’s silly, because a correlation doesn’t imply causation. What actually caused it was that poor people started having abortions. Those two things correlate!”
I may have read it wrong, but I very distinctly remember standing in the bookstore and looking up and saying WTF, at a somewhat embarrassing volume.
Everybody's a jerk. You. Me. This jerk.
by andromache on Mar 18, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i think you might have read it wrong
My millions are unconventional!
by Charlie Scrabbles on Mar 18, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's impossible.
I can’t even read.
Everybody's a jerk. You. Me. This jerk.
by andromache on Mar 18, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freakonomics is full of WTF! moments.
I thought it was fascinating even though was at times a lil’ bit ashamed at how easily I could follow the authors’ logic and find myself detached from my fellow humans.
IIRC, the abortion-helps-thin-the-ranks-of-the-deprived-and-destitute theory was based on someone else’s infamous work. I think a lot of the rest of the book was also.
"The latter part of a wise man's life is taken up in curing the follies, prejudices, and false opinions he had contracted in the former."
by Fat Vegas Alan on Mar 18, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another FanShot within a FanShot. (Again..this one's for you, Slyde.)
MILWAUKEE (AP) — Milwaukee Bucks forward Charlie Villanueva wasn’t talking Wednesday night before a game against Orlando. But he was back on Twitter — safely before tipoff this time.
Villanueva became an overnight Web celebrity after he posted a note, called a ‘’tweet,’’ to his feed on the popular social networking Web site during halftime of Sunday’s game against Boston.
The note itself was short and not particularly juicy; Villanueva basically wrote that he had to step it up in the second half. He did, and the Bucks won.
But by tweeting from the locker room during halftime, Villanueva seemed to take online athlete-fan interactivity to another level — and earned a stern talking-to from Bucks coach Scott Skiles, who thought it gave the impression that Villanueva wasn’t focused.
Villanueva said Tuesday that he made a mistake and wouldn’t do it again during a game. But he still seemed to be pondering the issue Wednesday.
‘’About to take my nap, but I’m looking for some answers here,‘’ Villanueva posted to his Twitter feed. ’’what’s the difference between halftime twitting and halftime interview?’’
It’s an interesting question, actually — but not one Villanueva would talk about in person before Wednesday’s game. Villanueva brushed off an interview request, saying he had to go sign autographs.
Meanwhile, the list of ’’followers’’ who subscribe to Villanueva’s Twitter feed has nearly quadrupled in the space of a day. He had 1,600 subscribers as of Tuesday afternoon and more than 6,000 as of Wednesday evening.
More Articles in Sports "
"The latter part of a wise man's life is taken up in curing the follies, prejudices, and false opinions he had contracted in the former."
by Fat Vegas Alan on Mar 18, 2009 10:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs






















