18 game capsule, take 9
And…..we’re done. The Reds conclude another losing season, but with some extra dashes of hope thrown in at the end. Will these few weeks of excellence carry over into 2010 as a tsunami of momentum? Are the pieces in place for a pennant run? Is the new-found spark between Don and Betty Draper just an illusion? All these answers and more after the jump.
2009 Reds, Capsule 9
Overview:
Wins/Losses: 13 - 5 (PSA), 78 - 84 (YTD)
Strength of Schedule: .489, YTD (15th most difficult in NL; 29th most difficult in ML) [Prev: .490 YTD SOS, 12th most difficult in NL; 26th most difficult in ML]
RPI (ESPN): .487, YTD (11th best in NL; 22nd best in ML)
[Prev: .481 YTD RPI, 14th best in NL; 26th best in ML]
Baseball Prospectus playoff odds (based on team stats, YTD): 0.0% [prev: 0.0%]
Baseball Prospectus playoff odds (based on ELO concept): 0.0% [prev: 0.0%]
Baseball Prospectus playoff odds (based on team stats + PECOTA projections): 0.0% [prev: 0.0%]
Offense:
- For the period, hitters posted slash rates of .286/.358/.482, compared to league averages of .256/.329/.398.
- The eight "regulars" as defined by the players with the most plate appearances during this period were: Phillips, Votto, Stubbs, Janish, Rolen, Bruce, Gomes, and Nix.
- Joey Votto staked a late claim to the MVP award: in the final 18 games, Votto accrued 30 hits, 15 doubles, 4 HR, 14 RBI, and 11 BB. The slash rates of 469/547/891 are commended, and we-the humble fans-request a full season performance to this effect in 2010.
- Jay Bruce threw down to the tune of a 1060 OPS. His job is not guaranteed next year. If, however, Bruce is lucky enough to be given a starting spot...he and Votto hitting anything like this would mask a ton of gaps.
- Speaking of gaps: Paul Janish, for more or less the final third of the season, has held a regular spot. His period-by-period OPS levels for periods 7, 8, and 9: 627, 616, 620. Consistency is admirable, but is not sufficient for a starting job. This is not the answer.
- Irrational exuberance abounds with every positive step from the youngsters. Drew Stubbs hit 3 more taters and put up a PSA OPS of 846. Juan Francisco only went 9-for-20.
- Brandon Phillips had a semi-disappointing period, in which the power disappeared, and fell two RBI short of 100.
- For the year, only three players reached 400 plate appearances.
Pitching:
- A third consecutive strong showing by the pitchers (PSA ERA of 3.13 vs. league average of 4.08)
- Most of that above-averageness can be pinned on two guys: Arroyo and Homer. The former threw 23.3 innings in three starts, and allowed just five runs.
- The latter gets his own friggin' bullet. Homer Bailey made four starts, accumulating 26 innings, and only gave up three runs. He went 3-0, saw opponents hit just .219 off him, and struck out 22 while walking nine. Has he arrived?
- The bullpen was kinda awesome too. Cordero, Burton, Rhodes, and Masset combined for 26.3 innings where 0 earned runs were surrendered.
- Justin Lehr gave up 8 HR in 16 innings.
- The defense raised the YTD DER by a couple points in these last 18 games, bringing the rate to .705, good for 3rd best in the NL, and 4th best in all of baseball.
Other notes:
- The Reds' offense underperformed league average BABIP for the year (.285 vs. .302). Similarly, the pitching staff yielded lower than average BABIP as compared to average rates (.279 vs. .290). I wonder if there are any ballpark effects at work.
- On an OPS+ basis, the Reds had the 2nd worst offense in the league with a mark of 84. The Giants were able to "beat" that futility with an 82 team OPS+. It's worth noting that while these marks are indeed bad, they are skewed by being in the National League. The entire NL posted an average OPS+ of just 94, and only two teams were over the 100 mark.
- The Reds pitching was above average (team ERA+ of 105, compared to league average of 101), but in the context of the note above-this is woefully short of being good enough to pick up the bad offense. The Giants, who ended up 4 games short of the Wild Card team, had a team ERA+ of 120.
- In terms of offensive categories where the Reds stood out as a team, there were two: the Reds led the league in sacrifice hits (100, vs. league average of 71), and finished last in the league in intentional walks (37 vs. league average of 48).
- Pitching-wise, there was no category in which the Reds collectively separated from the pack, save for the esoteric category of balks, in which the Reds only committed one to lead the league (Edinson Volquez in April).
- As a group, the pitching staff was below average in striking batters out (6.6 K/9 vs. league average of 7.1), in not walking batters (3.6 BB/9 vs. league average of 3.5), and in keeping the ball in the yard (1.2 HR/9 vs. league average of 1.0). It would appear that looking for a new pitching coach is appropriate.
- Using the Pythagorean win totals, the Reds sit about 15 games behind divisional pace-setting St. Louis. I think there are several factors that can chip away at that difference, including an expectation of fewer injuries, fewer Tavares, and greater emergence from Votto/Bruce/Stubbs/Bailey. That said, I see five crucial variables for next year-the Reds will probably need four of them to be positive for a playoff jackpot: Arroyo/Harang need to be at solid #2/#3 starter level, an improvement at SS, the emergence/acquisition of another power bat, another career-ish year from Rolen, and 1st half Hanigan to show up instead of 2nd half Hanigan.
1 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Great stuff, as always
I saw a lot less HAVOC this year than I was prepared for, but I think that shows up in the number of sacrifice hits we had. The times when we bunted Willy Taveras over to second instead of having him steal from first would have been too many to mention, except Taveras never got on first that much. You got the guy to steal bases, Dusty. Let him steal bases!
by Brendanukkah on Oct 6, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with the sentiment here
Two things stick out from the season stats:
- The pitchers, who hit quite a few positions below Taveras (and should often SH), hit 53 of those 100, leading the league.
- The team leader, non-pitcher division? The worst hitter on the team
- Their #2 hitters were second in the league in SH, but well behind NY and in the mix with other teams .
In other words, I don’t think the Reds sac’d way too much. They might have a bit too much, but I don’t think “havoc” really reared its ugly head.
"You never know how you look through other people's eyes"
by sidnancy on Oct 6, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taveras inability to get on base
suppressed the Reds SH. But even with a Lead-off hitter that couldnt get on base- the Reds still led the NL in SAC excluding the pitching totals.
Its a patented Dusty strategy to put a weak bat in the 2 hole and sacrifice early in the game.
by davidmac84 on Oct 6, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once every 10 games
That’s how often, on average, the #2 hitter hit a sac bunt. 16 times, or once every 10 games.
Granted, that’s about how often Taveras was on base, but it’s a bit of a stretch to call something that happens once every other week a “patented strategy”.
"You never know how you look through other people's eyes"
by sidnancy on Oct 6, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the espn link
the splits section is pretty slick.
I would say the Reds still were 2nd in SH from the 2 slot and Dusty’s evil plans to be number in SH from a weaking heating 2 slot hitter were largely sabatoged by Willie Taveras and the leadoff hitters having an OBP slightly over 300(I also didnt realize how horrible Jimmy Rollins was this year- sub 300 OBP).
But we will see what he does next year- but if Janish is hitting 2 and bunting over Stubbs in the 1st inning- Dusty and I are going to have big problems.
by davidmac84 on Oct 6, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where are the answers about Betty and Don?
I say it’s real!
by ken on Oct 6, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
big thanks again to riverfront76 for doing these all season
even with his balsa-wood bat, i think Janish can be an average or better SS next season. his glove is really that good. and while the offense is bad and we’d like to score more runs, a run saved is just as good as a run scored. some would even argue that it’s better.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Oct 6, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
I just think there’s a distinct possibility that Frazier or Sutton at 2B and BP at SS could net more value than Janish at short. Of course, we’ll never know.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Oct 6, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Janish was the top
fielding SS in the Majors according to UZR/150 with min 500 innings.
Of course- I would say that probably isnt his true level- but if he is a 10-15 plus fielder at SS he should be at least league average.
The positive for his offense is Paul is right at league average for BB% which provides a nice floor for his offense.
I would prescribe for Paul- a Brett Boone offseason workout program and turn some of the doubles into home runs and you have a pretty decent SS.
Otherwise he is not a bad altnerative while you try to develop Cozart unless you plan on being bold and switching Phillips to SS.
by davidmac84 on Oct 6, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'll get no argument from me
Janish would do well do get on some kind of weight training and pill-popping regime. If he can hit the ball harder, he’ll be more than acceptable. Barring that kind of suspicious Bret Boone like improvement though, I think it’s just as likely that you get at least the same amount of WAR with Sutton/Frazier at 2B and BP at SS.
That uncertainty would seem to suggest that you maintain the current order. I would suggest the opposite for the Reds. Since they’re unlikely to bring in any outside help, maintaining positional and roster flexibility is essential. There’s no reason , other than pride, that BP shouldn’t be able to go back to second base if the experiment doesn’t work. Increase your chances for improvement in the middle infield simply by increasing the permutations BP-Janish, BP-Frazier, BP-Sutton. I’d wager to guess they’re all worth around 3-6 WAR. Maybe one will surprise you. Janish, Frazier and Sutton all have upside. If one of Sutton or Frazier can give you a wOBA north of .360 – a reasonable expectation based on minor league numbers – and play neutral defense at 2B, they’ll have more value than Janish at short. It’s then a question of how BP plays SS. Maybe they missed the boat on switching him over and never will. But they can’t afford to exhaust every option, though the time to start doing that was probably months if not years ago.
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Oct 6, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the ship on Brandon playing SS
has sailed although its sad that the Reds never experimented with Brandon playing SS.
I mean what did they have to lose in the last 2 seasons with giving Phillips some time at SS.
by davidmac84 on Oct 6, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
everything
i mean sometimes Walt is like a prison shower, you know it is gonna happen, but it isn’t a good thing.
by justin007000 on Oct 6, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet he takes balls there next spring
But Frazier isn’t ready at 2B, so it will probably be a 2011 move…..post dusty.
by Dave from Louisville on Oct 6, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frazier is in a growth spurt...I would not be surprised at all to see him make a run for a spot on the 25 man.
Especially if the Red don’t get a hitting SS…
Todd Frazier can hit. And he a decent enough fielder. He’s closer now than Stubbs was at this time last year….
Jay Bruce will become a major league baseball STAR, starting in April, 2010.....
by Madville on Oct 6, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'd think a really good team would have lowest strength of schedule
Because they’re never playing themselves. Huh.
IAN! I'm on traain!
by andromache on Oct 6, 2009 1:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This just goes to show..
… how bad the NL Central was this year. We played a lot of games against the Pirates and Astros and a sub .500 Brewers.
The season doesn't start until the Cincinnati Reds take the field! Reclaim The Opener!!
by TheC on Oct 7, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But so did the Cardinals, and the Cardinals got to play us.
IAN! I'm on traain!
by andromache on Oct 7, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Team OPS+
I’m not positive, but I think the team OPS+ figures skew low because of the inclusion of pitcher hitting. When the average OPS is calculated, bb-ref excludes pitchers so that position players are compared against themselves. But when you include the pitchers in the team OPS+ calculations, the results skew low.
by ken on Oct 6, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
That was intended to be inferred, but probably needed to be a bit more explicitly spelled out in my post.
by riverfront76 on Oct 6, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We can't get 'em on and we can't 'em in, but at least we can get 'em over!
by Geki on Oct 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Get over it!
Yeah, those guys and the Cincinnati Reds. They're a terrible football team. / Because they're a baseball team? / Exactly. You know who's the worst football team? The Philadelphia Flyers. - Best Show
by RijoSaboCaseyWKRP on Oct 6, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















