Uh-oh Cueto got lit up
He only pitched 2/3 of an inning. Does this erase everything he has done so far? He gave up 3 hits, 5 walks, didn't strike anyone out, and 5 runs. He threw 41 pitches. Does this mean at the very least Homer Bailey is back in the running? There is enough time for both Bailey and Cueto to get one more start. I am guessing if Cueto pitches well enough in his next start, he will still be in the rotation. Maybe he is in his "dead arm" period. If Bailey puts up a big game his next start and Cueto sucks again, they could trade places.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The increased coverage
It would be as silly to put a lot of stock into this outing today as it would be to write off Homer because of his Spring.
To be expected
You're probably a Hillary Clinton supporter too!
It was ugly
But it happens to the best of them sometimes. I wouldn't panic just yet.
However, it did make the game awfully long. The first inning seemed to go on forever.
shit
What I was trying to articulate is
I think they're pretty set on what they want
by Brendanukkah on Mar 24, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
completly hypothetical
Once again this is not a prediction. In a way though I feel that Bailey may learn more in Cincinnati. In AAA he can completely overpower hitters with his stuff, so he doens't have to work on his breaking stuff and command, where he would in the big leagues. I just have a hard time seeing him progress in AAA.
by justin0070000 on Mar 24, 2008 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions
my argument became moot.
by justin0070000 on Mar 24, 2008 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Fay says...
Cool. Nothing against Josh Fogg, but I'd rather see Homer.

by 



















