Put'em in the #1 hole.
Leadoff Hitters.
Are they really that important? Must the lanky slap-hittin speedster fill the position? Or should it be the guy with the best (pick your poison) AVG, OBP, SB, walk rate, friendly face, someone who works the count, disrupts pitchers while on the basepaths, ground ball hitter, fly ball hitter....
I am no genius on the matter, and this did not enlighten me. This here was helpful but made the matter more complex. And then I learn that we did this last year. So what's up with the leadoff spot? Is it some big myth made up in little league? Or is there a science behind choosing the right guy?
More importantly who slides into the hole in spring training?
Do we let multiple guys play in our hole?
Do we allow a newbie into our hole or go to someone with a little more experience?
Do these questions sound oddly gay?
Lets here who you want leading off for the Reds.
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm not putting anything in the #1 hole
I think it all depends on who is playing. If Freel is starting, lead him off. He has a history of getting on base well, though he wasn't as good last season.
If Bruce starts in center, then it depends on who is on the infield. If Keppinger is playing, then I'd be fine with him leading off. Again, he's pretty good at getting on base. Otherwise, I'd be okay with Hatte or Votto.
And if BP is ever leading off, I hope they put Dunn in the 2-spot, rather than (God forbid) Gonzalez.
I really want Freel to go back to his '04-'06 form
I really like Dunner in the 2-spot. I was always pleased when he ended up there on the Narron random lineup rotation.
by beasleymachine on Feb 7, 2008 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
Dunn at the 2
by Man Mountain on Feb 7, 2008 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
I voted for Votto
How's this look?
- Bruce CF
- Votto 1B
- Griffey RF
- Phillips 2B
- Dunn LF
- Encarnacion 3B
- Gonzalez SS
- Ross C
I think this is the year to move Jr. down to 5 or
Bruce CF
Gonzalez SS or Keppinger
Phillips 2B
Dunn LF
Griffey RF
Encarnacion 3B
Votto 1B
Ross C
After Grif gets hurt:
Noho/Freel
Bruce CF
Phillips 2B
Dunn LF
Encarnacion 3B
Votto 1B
Gonzalez SS or Keppinger
Ross C
how can i be the only person
Forshame.

Oh, I'd be interested in trying Votto at the top of the lineup, but whoever the leadoff guy is will be running a lot with the toothpick calling the shots. And Votto won't be that guy. I'm positive we'll see Hopper/Freel, which has the potential to be bad unless NoHo really is a infield hit witch or Freel reverts back to pre-running-into-shit-Freel. Damn, I'm hungover
Doing shots of tequila every time
Ay caramba! Que lastima!
(Dempsey and Altidore are total studs, though.)
by Brendanukkah on Feb 7, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions
you said it
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 7, 2008 7:39 PM EST up reply actions
From what I've read about the game
I do like our form going forward, but I just don't see it as varied or deep enough to get out of a medium to tough group in the WC. I think Bradley will rotate in enough young guys to find out what works.
I do love that a number of our U-21s are in Europe rather than MLS and that Bradley is encouraging that.
by Man Mountain on Feb 7, 2008 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
the U-21s look really promising
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 7, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
I would have voted for boobs
In Ohio, voting rules don't apply
Grifey
by Man Mountain on Feb 7, 2008 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Four I wouldn't mind....
Ryan Freel - can work a count and force a pitcher to show plenty of pitches(as can Hatte), can take pitchers attention away from the batter while on base
Norris Hopper - because he can yell "Surprise cockfags!" (points) as he lays down a drag bunt on the first pitch of the game
Joey Votto - the whole, 'he's good at getting on base' deal
I would rather have Dunn, Griff, EdE, and Bruce in as many rbi situations as possible
Kepp and Hatte- meh
Gonzalez and Ross- heck no
oh, and boobs are never first, they go second or third...and if you put them fourth or fifth, you're just wasting precious time.
team america
Earl Weaver
Novel idea, at least for road games.
No options were harmed in the making of this comment.
by Lonesome George on Feb 7, 2008 2:10 PM EST reply actions
Does that mean
by beasleymachine on Feb 7, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
I don't believe it
I thought
by justin0070000 on Feb 7, 2008 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
Don't rain on our parade
by beasleymachine on Feb 7, 2008 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah
by ken on Feb 7, 2008 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
You lawyers and your rule 6.10(b)s
How about this
Pitching Statline for the year: 32 G 3 W 0 L 0.0 IP
Actually
also
So you're suggesting
Valentin would have to complete the at bat
by justin0070000 on Feb 8, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
thats ridiculous
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 9, 2008 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
crazy like Fox
Didn't know about this
by ken on Feb 7, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
I would guess
Something like this:
1st time through:
Stanton (Valentin)
Freel
Gonzalez
Griffey
Phillips
Dunn
Encarnacion
Votto
Ross
2nd time through:
Harang
Freel
Gonzalez
Griffey
Phillips
Dunn
Encarnacion
Votto
Ross
Something like a double switch in the first inning? Is this right?
Yeah, but
The counter counter argument is
I think he only did it during September of '74 or '75, and he was scrapping to get more offense (runs) per game, so that is what he did.
If you have good starters and you don't expect to use up your bull-pen, it's one way to guarantee that your best pinch hitter gets used in an effective way.
That was Earl, and he managed to win. Whatever.
I just threw that out there because it seemed like a fun thing to do.
And because I can no longer discuss options.
by Lonesome George on Feb 7, 2008 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
Don't take the Options thing so hard...
by jacob brumfield on Feb 7, 2008 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Why not list Valentin as the SP
by ken on Feb 7, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
I don't like it
by justin0070000 on Feb 7, 2008 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
I think it's weird too....
Ideally, you have somebody who can hit 0.300, walks a lot, has an OBP of 0.40 or better (Morgan and Rose both had an OBP of around 0.390 or 0.400 in 1972, and both scored over 100 runs) and can steal 50 bases a year (Morgan batted second and stole over 50 bases).
We don't have a player like that. Hopper is close, but we would all rather have Bruce start in CF, Griffey in Right and Dunner in Left.
Having BP lead off is not terrible. He actually only "leads off" once a game. He might frequently come to bat with men on base to drive in, in key rbi situations (clutch?!). You should set up your line-up so that your best hitters come to bat most often. I think it makes no sense to have some ding-dong banjo 0.240 hitter in the two-spot just so he can "hit behind the runner" or some such numb-skull idea that's been in baseball forever.
If Hatteberg plays, he bats second (IMHO).
If Votto plays, bat Edwin second. Or Votto.
Bat Dunn third, so that he gets the protection of Griffey; plus he walks a lot. This could force pitcher to bat to Dunn; fewer walks but more production on 3-2 counts?
Griffey is experienced enough to bat fourth and suffer from being pitched around in certain situations.
If Bruce plays, bat him fifth.
If Hopper plays, he bats lead-off and BP bats fifth.
Bat Ross eighth no matter what.
Gonzalez 7th, unless he's tearing it up (unlikely).
Sixth is Edwin or Joey. Flip flop them between sixth and 2nd.
Dusty will bat Gonzalez second, because that's where Short-stops bat, you know, to hit behind the runner. Never mind that A-gon doesn't do that.
by Lonesome George on Feb 7, 2008 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
Heh
I just looked up what he did in Chicago, and a huge majority of the time in 2003 and 2005-2006, Dusty had his 2B or SS bat second. It didn't matter who it was, the batter in the 2-hole was almost always a middle infielder. In 2004, he broke from that method and tried a variety of players in the 2-spot, including Derrek Lee and Michael Barrett.
And of course, the player in 2003 that started the most games batting second for the Cubs? Alex "Not Sea Bass" Gonzalez.
And I didn't even have to look it up...
by Lonesome George on Feb 10, 2008 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
OPENING DAY TICKET "LOTTERY"
MORE LOTTERY FYI
OPENING DAY RANDOM DRAWING: On or about Wednesday, February 13, 2008
WINNERS NOTIFIED VIA E-MAIL: On or about Wednesday, February 13, 2008
OPENING DAY SALE FOR WINNERS: Thursday, February 14, 2008 @ 9:00 a.m. ET
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 12, 2008 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks Alan.
im buying 10
oui
by Man Mountain on Feb 12, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions
I've got extras.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 12, 2008 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
the lottery is bullshit
by justin0070000 on Feb 12, 2008 7:26 PM EST up reply actions
stinking capitalist
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 12, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions
Opening Day is overrated
a real fan goes to game 4
I did enjoy that game though. Belisle pitched 6 good innings, I think Coffey threw a good inning (2) along with Weathers. I think Stanton may or may not have pitched that day, or it may have been Saarloos. I got real excited when I was teased by Coutlangus, but he never entered the game. I took a blanket, and wore multiple layers, the hot dogs were rarely hot, but the drink stayed cold.
Also remember that season when the Red's bullpen didn't give up a run in the first week and half of the season?
by justin0070000 on Feb 12, 2008 9:37 PM EST up reply actions
youre both wrong
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 12, 2008 9:51 PM EST up reply actions
Well obviously slyde was lying
by justin0070000 on Feb 13, 2008 12:32 AM EST up reply actions
Laptop Guy
You do realize
by Man Mountain on Feb 13, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions

by 



















