Could I really like Dusty?
I know this is almost heresy in these parts, and I didn't like the hire at the time, but is it OK to be excited after reading this article?
62 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've actually gotten over my Dusty distrusty
By July, I'm certain I won't like him, but then he's a major league manager. For some reason, I tend to not like their kind.
Liking Dusty is similar to The Fart Button.
glad to know i'm the only one who has softened
Harang-Wood
Aaron Harang, in his career, has thrown 15 games where he threw 120+ pitches
Kerry Wood threw 14 games where he threw 120+ pitches in 2003.
Pardon my skepticism on Baker.
From the article:
That shit is deep, man.
philosopher king?

i so totally see it.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 16, 2008 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
Heh
4B: Comments by Trolls and Asshats:
This may be a free country, but The Big Picture is my personal fiefdom. I rule over all as benevolent dictator/philospher king/utility infielder. Fear my wrath, mortals!I will ban anyone whom I choose from posting comments -- usually, for a damned good reason, but on rare occasions, for the exact same reason God created the platypus: because I feel like it.
Agreed
Of course, things get lost in journalistic translation. Everyone always says how much of a funny guy Kent Mercker is, but everything they print is just "meh"-worthy. Anyway, the players seem to be having a positive reaction so far to Dusty, and while I shiver at what his lineup construction might look like, there's always the chance that that lineup will play their brains out for him.
Let's go, Reds?
by Brendanukkah on Feb 17, 2008 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
Patterson
I'm apposed to him leading off over Jay Bruce
by justin0070000 on Feb 17, 2008 7:22 PM EST up reply actions
bruce
here it is
.329
.320
.254
.314
.304
Those are Patterson's OBP since 2002. Last year Freel struggled and put up a .308 but his career rate is .358.
Hopper put up a .371 in 300 at bats last year. In his minor league career he had a .343 which isn't great all things considered.
like i said
My mom supplies more power
Dusty has talked to his former centerfielder
"Everybody needs a leadoff hitter," Baker said. "I think that is the most unappreciated, hardest to find quality position in baseball."
To that end, Baker has talked to Kenny Lofton and Corey Patterson. Could either end up in Reds camp?
"There's a chance," Baker said. "They're out there looking for jobs. You want to get right pieces of the puzzle."
The hang up with Lofton is the Reds don't have a spot on the 40-man rosrter. "Kenny wants a big-league contract," Baker said.
Signing Lofton would not necessarily mean that Jay Bruce starts the year in the minors.
"I haven't seen Bruce play," Baker said. "You see Junior (Griffey) who came at 19. Corey Patterson was rushed a bit and didn't get time to mature. It's kind of like raising your kid: You don't know if you did the right it until later. . . it's something that is very hard to judge. When is now? It's not secret Bruce is a star of futrue. Who knows he could be a star of the present. I'm very impressed talking to him."
And I think we all know that if Corey Patterson is in the lineup, he'll be leading off. This is Dusty Baker, not a real person with a real brain.
Now correct me if I am wrong
What is not to like?
You're forgetting...
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 17, 2008 10:32 PM EST up reply actions
that doesnt sound like a very good player at all
I'm sure he would propell the Bats
by justin0070000 on Feb 18, 2008 1:09 AM EST up reply actions
The thing about Patterson is
If they're going to go out and get Patterson
dusty must be ca-razy
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 18, 2008 6:01 PM EST up reply actions
operative word being
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 18, 2008 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
Dusty, our man in the dugout...
On a team that had Hank Aaron, Darrol Evans (+40 Hr), Dave Johnson (+40 Hr), Dusty batted fourth (Hank batted third), with only around 20 Hr. The manager must've thought he knew something about the way Dusty 'played the game'.
If he can get the Reds to reach down and play harder and WIN, then maybe it's more than talk.
Sparky is remembered as a 'great' manager, but he ruined about one pitcher a year. In 1970, he ruined Jim Merritt and Wayne Simpson. In '72 he ruined Tom Hall. That's part of pushing players and a team to win a pennant. I guess.
I don't see Dusty as being an original thinker as a manager, as many of the other insightful fans that post here don't, either. Yet he MIGHT be able to get this team to reach down and play harder than Bob Boone, Dave Miley or Jerry Narron ever could. Plus, he might have a not half - bad pitching staff. As those guys frankly all had pretty lousy pitching staffs, through not much fault of theirs. The Reds just didn't have the talent, misused though it sometimes was.
So yeah, I'm not overly optimistic about Dusty as a manager. But then again, he may get this team to win, which they haven't done in 7 straight seasons. And the losing really sucks, if you're a Reds fan. So let's just see what Dusty does managing the Reds, before we are convinced that he's a mistake.
by Lonesome George on Feb 17, 2008 7:49 PM EST reply actions
PS
by Lonesome George on Feb 17, 2008 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
In his career...
Leading off an inning for Dusty? 306 PAs. Nine walks. Nine. (That's a slightly better ratio than 22 in 809 but still it just makes you kinda wince when you see nine, doesn't it?)
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 17, 2008 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
Gladly.
I was checking out the Reds' game logs from last season and trying to determine exactly when it was that Cincinnati fell in love with the scraptastic Hopp n' Kepp duo and then I wanted to try to quantify exactly what those two little spark plugs did for the Reds' offense down the stretch and then I wanted to see if their contributions really amounted to anything other than some sticky messes in Marty's pants.
Here's what I found... On July 17 in Atlanta, Keppinger got his first start since May. He batted second. He played SS and 3B. He had a double, a walk, two RBI and he scored a run. The Reds won 6-5. It was what would be the second win in a modest four-game winning streak and was right in the middle of their little 10-of-14 tear they went on as Mackinin was taking over. So, let's call 7/17 the hypothetically precise and exact unscientific moment in the season when the Jeff Keppinger era began.
Hopper? I hadn't realy gotten that far yet. But he started leading off here and there beginning on August 1 and then became the every day lead off guy around September 1. (The Reds were something like 17-10 in August and 10-17 in September.)
Anyway, I then started Slyd-ing some numbers around and I think I discovered that yes, the Reds were scoring more runs after 7/17 (.28 per game if my math and my memory were/are correct) but the real reason for the Reds' limited increase in success might have been that the pitchers and the defense were allowing nearly .5 fewer runs per game. (Again, my math was not double-checked and I do not have the back of those envelopes in front of me this morning.)
So there's that. Is that anything? I was just wondering...
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 18, 2008 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
Here's what I found
Similarly, in games where either player started anywhere in the lineup: 4.67 RS/G, 5.49 RA/G. Games when neither player started: 5.01 RS/G, 5.01 RA/G.
So what's my point? The pitching is still the problem.
And, if you are still wondering when the Hopper and Keppinger thing became an official movement, it was August 9th when andromache dubbed them Hoppinger. It's not a movement without a name.
Nicely done. Thanks.
And other stuff.

by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 18, 2008 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
It's a'ight
But please don't ever stop the pictures. It would be a sad day if you did.
I'll bowel to that, my liege...
Don't want no walks a cloggin'
Clogging is not for everyone.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 18, 2008 7:14 PM EST up reply actions
That's just the thing
The Players
Felipe Lopez? The guy was a bad adventure at short stop. You never knew if his throws were going to be on target or not.
Jason Larue? Mr. Passed Ball; this guy was a mediocre catcher, AT BEST. Not a surprise that Krivsky went and got Ross in 2006.
Griffey was once a great CF, but his range has been decreasing steadily the last 5 years. Finally, they bit the bullet and put him in right in 2007. And he's struggling with that, too.
Dunn's a valuable slugger and offensive player, but he's got a glove that goes clank in the night. He's worked hard to make himself mediocre.
Josh Hamilton, a freakin' gazelle, a thing of beauty as an outfielder. Traded.
If anyone is not disapointed with the work ethic of this team, it may be because they don't have much to compare it too, in recent memory. I don't mean that as a personal criticism, just that we have become used to mediocre and sub-mediocre play, and justified it because of economics; "Cincinnati is a small market team".
by Lonesome George on Feb 17, 2008 8:34 PM EST reply actions
Every player makes errors.
Basically, criticizing work ethic is what morons seem to do when they don't like a player and want to make him look bad. See: Dunn haters, Edwin haters (look at the steps forward he's taken), and formerly the Kearns haters
you have a right to be concerned
by justin0070000 on Feb 18, 2008 1:07 AM EST up reply actions
who are you calling a cheetah?
Obligatory cheesecake .jpg
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 18, 2008 7:10 PM EST up reply actions
wow
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 18, 2008 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
Like the amazonian tribe
I was always a Dusty fan when he was a player.
Good luck Dustman.
I don't think our 3B needs special love.
Griffey is only 83....
And you forgot that our potential starting Centerfielder has two personalities (or more?).
In other "news you can use", I read that Bret Boone is making a comeback this spring with (drum roll, please), the Washington Nationals. (cymbal!)
Aaron Boone, Bret Boone and Bob Boone; all working for Diamond Jim Bowden. So when everybody starts hatin' on Wayne Krivsky, just remember it could be worse. And at one time it was.
by Lonesome George on Feb 18, 2008 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
Bret says that he has nothing to lose...
Nothing wrong with a schizoid CF - remember the great Jimmy Piersal? With any lick at all Jay B------------- will take care of the center field dilemma in ST.
Which Boone you talkin' 'bout boy?
Boone, The Fallen House of
by Charlie Scrabbles on Feb 18, 2008 5:44 PM EST up reply actions
Christ on a hubcap...thats LUCK not lick.
Hey, is Sammy Sosa a free agent?
Please
by beasleymachine on Feb 18, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions
Press the fart button.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Feb 18, 2008 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
you know you want to
Maybe
by Pops Daniels on Feb 19, 2008 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
That......
I don't think they like eachother.
by justin0070000 on Feb 19, 2008 1:56 AM EST up reply actions

by 



















