Dye, Another Day
I know everybody has probably already talked themselves to death on this subject in your pool halls and at the local watering hole, but I had technical difficulties yesterday that prevented me from joining in, so now I will say my part.
First, let's look at Jermaine Dye's numbers over the last 3 seasons:
NOTE: I've added a new column to the table. Some of you may not be familiar with wOBA, but it stands for Weighted On Base Average and the short description is that it is a "runs per plate appearance" stat that has been adjusted to follow the OBP scale. So, .335 is about average, .400 is very good, and Corey Patterson posted a .250 last season. You can read more about wOBA here.
The first thing to point out about Dye is that 2006 is very much an outlier in his career. The next highest slugging percentage for his career is .561, which he posted in 2000 with the Royals. Those two seasons are the only time his OPS has been over .900 as well. Not to say that Dye is a bad player, but we shouldn't expect him to be the guy he was in 2006.
What should we expect then? Well, only two major forecasting systems have been freely released at this point, and both have him putting up very similar numbers:
Defensively, Chone Smith projects him at about 6 plays below average in either corner outfield spot.
Dye may get a little bit of a boost offensively by moving to the NL, but I wouldn't expect him to be much better than he was last season, and he would have finished 5th on the Reds in Justin's Total Value rating. So, I don't exactly think we're talking about a huge upgrade to the offense here.
So why would the Reds want him? Well, for one thing, he kills left-handed pitching. Over the last 3 seasons, his OPS against lefties has been 1.075, .925, and .917. He'd definitely add some pop to the lineup. He has the 8th most home runs in the Majors over the last 4 seasons. He's got a ring. Arroyo's the only other current Reds player that can say that.
The real question though is "What's the goal?" Dye is owed $11.5 million in 2009 and has a $10 million option ($1 million buyout) for 2010. Adding Dye alone to the lineup does not turn the Reds into contenders. And while he adds some pop to the lineup, he does nothing to help the shoddy defense. I've said before that Dye is the type of player that you pick up to turn your team into a finished product, not as your first move of the off-season.
The Reds are several pieces away from a finished product right now. If they had already acquired some players to solidify the infield defense and all they needed was a right-handed bat to round things out, I'd say go after Dye. But bringing Dye in pretty much locks Encarnacion in at 3B, unless they trade him (and EdE's projections look a lot like Dye's). Having an opening in LF gives the Reds the flexibility to be creative, but acquiring Dye would mean the Reds are using brute force to fill a hole.
I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not opposed to acquiring Dye. He's a very good hitter and would definitely add something to the Reds lineup. However, he wouldn't be the first move I make because acquiring an outfielder limits the team's options. If Dye could put up Matt Holliday type numbers, I'd be all for it. But since Dye's upside is essentially replacing Dunn's, offensively and defensively, I just don't find it to be the smart move at this point.
0 recs |
65 comments
|
Comments
Agreed
As others have said, Dye isn’t worth the money plus Homer for where this team is at. But Dye is still a good hitter, and a Dye/Dickerson platoon in LF could be interesting. I might go for it if the Sox were only asking for a pittance or were wiling to pay a good chunk of Dye’s salary.
Also, if we’re looking for relief help, there’s a certain unreliable lefthander available. Eric Milton, if you’re too lazy to link.
by ken on Nov 26, 2008 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sign Juan Rivera instead.
I like Jermaine Dye, but Rivera provides a RH bat and a solid glove in LF. In a full season he’s capable of 20+ HR. He’s said to be asking for $6-8 for two years and won’t cost a player nor a prospect. Rivera’s five years younger than Dye and, at least in my opinion, is underrated.
We Are ... Marshall!
by Thundering Turtle on Nov 26, 2008 1:21 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
rec'd
i was thinking the same thing. i dont understand Walt’s preference for trade over free agency. they call it “free” agency because it doesnt cost you any prospects. or something like that.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Two things worry me about Rivera
First, his line drive rate is at 15.8% for his career and was just 14.3% last year. I’d really rather see that number up around 19% or higher.
Second, his walk rate is at Brandon Phillips levels. In fact, his hitting numbers look a lot like BP’s. That’s great if he’s playing gold glove level 2B, but for an average corner outfielder I’m not that interested.
Personally I’d rather they either signed Milton Bradley, a hitter who might have some serious game changing ability, or traded for David Dejesus, a relatively cheap hitter who could still provide some decent production.
Actually, I’d rather they focused on the infield first, but if they are going after outfielders, that’s who I’d pursue.
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Nov 26, 2008 1:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
DeJesus I like.
I’m just not convinced Bradley can stay healthy, or even thinks he can stay healthy, playing in the NL.
We Are ... Marshall!
by Thundering Turtle on Nov 26, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The biggest problem with Bradley...
Has a lot to do with what he thinks. He has the potential to really be a guy opposing managers have to take into account in every game, but he has been a real headcase.
Like I said in the other thread, if he takes his Ritalin, he would be a much beter acquisition than Dye, and it would cost nothing but money, which is replaceable. You figure you could sign Bradley for something on the order of $23 million for two years (which is what you’d owe Dye anyway if you traded for him).
Hey Dusty...Are you sure you're OK? You might need an MRI.
by Paul Householder on Nov 26, 2008 2:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder.....
Dusty is a “player’s manager”, would that help with someone like Bradley?
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Nov 26, 2008 10:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You said it man
Nobody fucks with DeJesus. And I’d also pass on Bradley because he won’t stay healthy in this league.
by ken on Nov 26, 2008 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
God I hope we get him just for that reason
I want to say “Nobody fucks with DeJesus” as much as possible over the next two years
Are there any more dinner rolls? -President Ted Kennedy
by The Crushinator on Nov 26, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't imagine why the Royals would part with DeJesus
What could the Reds give ’em? They need a 2b, for certain…and some OF/pitching prospects? I feel like with what they would trade for DeJesus that the Royals could possibly accept…they ought to just gun for Beltre.
*This is all moot if someone else gets Beltre.
...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield
by Cy Schourek on Nov 26, 2008 9:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
DeJesus is a weak bat for LF
And with Crisp, they could be looking to move him. But yeah, not sure what it would take to get him.
by ken on Nov 28, 2008 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i hate coco crisp! it would be hard for me to root for that piece of shit after that brawl
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
by RaysOfHope on Nov 29, 2008 1:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wha?
In fact, his hitting numbers look a lot like BP’s.
Even after a disastrous ‘07 and ’08, Rivera’s career OPS+ is 20 points higher than BP’s. His BA and OBP are about 20 points higher and his SLG is 40 points higher; pre-injury, the difference is even more striking (another 10 points of each).
He isn’t a GG 2B, but he hits alot better than BP.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Nov 26, 2008 4:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
correction
he hit a lot better than BP. I’d be shocked if he ever puts up numbers like he did in 2004 and 2006 again, and those seasons are what boost his career numbers. With his line drive and walk rate, he’s going to need a lot of luck to put up his career average line again.
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Nov 26, 2008 5:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
is there a reason
that every time I see “Juan Rivera” I think “Ruben Sierra” and can’t figure out why the Reds want such a retread?
...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield
by Cy Schourek on Nov 26, 2008 9:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just don't mistake him
for Ruben Rivera.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 26, 2008 10:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Putting it here because I'm lazy
Krivsky has been hired by the Orioles.
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Nov 26, 2008 2:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't this like the fourth team that's hired him since he was with the reds?
Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill
by chandrathan on Nov 26, 2008 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Time for the O's
To sign another catcher…
Hey Dusty...Are you sure you're OK? You might need an MRI.
by Paul Householder on Nov 26, 2008 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lets send him a congratulatory present...
such as a certain toothpick chewing manager.
Nobody listens to Andrew
by nlt-andrew68 on Nov 26, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In what world...
Does Dye replace Dunn offensively? Dunn’s career OPS+ is 130. Dye’s is 112. Also, as much as everyone likes to talk about how much Dunn stinks in the field, everything I’ve seen has him rated as average to slightly above average for his performance last year., which is pretty much my perception. From what I’ve seen he’s noticeably improved in the field over the last few years.
by Jason461 on Nov 26, 2008 3:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
One player will not sufficiently replace Dunn's offensive output.
However the lack of leadoff Corey and that crusher Bako, with reduced time from Kepp will allow for some other combo of players to help make up for and maybe even better donkey’s lost offense.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Sir Winston Churchill
by Madville on Nov 26, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
their rolling wOPA for the last 3 years
is very close for Dunn and Dye. With Adam having 382 to 378 advantage- with adjustments for park and league for the 3 year period they are almost exactly equal offensively.
Of course because of Adams consistency and being younger deserves the higher projection- but its certainly not out of the realm of possibility that Jermaine could replace almost all of Dunn’s offensive value with slightly better defensive.
If the Reds dont lose to much offense replacing Adam, they are looking at gains in CF, RF, SS, hopefully catcher. with the other positions should be neutral.
On the defensive side- the Reds had their 5th starters go for an 8 ERA in around 150 innings.
Harang up about 1 run per 9 because of Dusty’s stupidity and a couple young arms with plus 8k per 9 averages in their 1st full MLB season.
So with Dye I could see an offense 20-30 runs better/ defense 70-80 runs better(5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone). And that at least starts to get you into the conversation of the wild card. The Reds would need one more move or a couple huge move upward moves in performance- but I dont see why Dye cannot be that first move.
by davidmac84 on Nov 26, 2008 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
About the last 3 years. I’d still take Dunn because of his age (which you noted) and also because is OBP is much higher than Dye’s. I think the place this team most needs to improve is OBP and while I think that will improve just because Patterson won’t be trying to set a record for most outs per plate appearance, I’ll almost always take a higher OBP guy over a higher SLG guy. But, really, I think we’re pretty much in agreement here. I wouldn’t mind seeing Dye here, I just think there are probably some better options.
by Jason461 on Nov 26, 2008 5:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, ok
With Adam having 382 to 378 advantage- with adjustments for park and league for the 3 year period they are almost exactly equal offensively…its certainly not out of the realm of possibility that Jermaine could replace almost all of Dunn’s offensive value
Dye’s OPS+:151, 106, 126. Career 112.
Dunn’s: 114, 136, 129. Career 130.
Even without knowing their ages, there is no way I anticipate Dye to come anywhere close to Dunn’s offensive value next year. No way.
If the Reds dont lose to much offense replacing Adam, they are looking at gains in..SS.
Thanks to Hairston’s career year, the Reds were actually pretty close to league-average at SS last year.
a couple young arms with plus 8k per 9 averages in their 1st full MLB season.
As was pointed out after the ROY voting, Volquez wasn’t a rookie last year. Also, there is no way he repeats his 3.21 ERA next year. No way.
5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone
First, it’d take 45 runs over the 189 2/3 IP from the 5th starters to get to an ERA of 5; 2nd, no team can really expect that kind of performance from their 5th starters. You know how many teams whose top 5 starters all had ERA+ over 90? Three – the Rays, Angels and Flubs.
So with Dye I could see an offense 20-30 runs better/ defense 70-80 runs better(5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone). And that at least starts to get you into the conversation of the wild card.
No, that gets you to 83 wins. The fewest wins by a wild card team in a non-strike season is 88, by the ‘96 O’s and ’06 Dodgers.
The Reds would need one more move or a couple huge move upward moves in performance- but I dont see why Dye cannot be that first move.
Because there are other moves that make a ton more sense because (1) the player is cheaper, (2) the player is likely better, (3) the player is available as a free agent, or (4) some combination of those.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Nov 26, 2008 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So Sid, What are the other available moves that you see as beter than Dye or Belre?
Remembering that you usually don’t get something for nothing who would you give up and who would you go for?
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Sir Winston Churchill
by Madville on Nov 26, 2008 8:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i cant speak for Sid
but i dont think the Reds should make any moves where they surrender prospects for veterans. as has been belabored for a few days here, this team is more than just a few pieces away from contending. i would prefer they sit tight and let the team grow a bit, but i’d also rather they trade vets than trade prospects. i would rather trade BP, Arroyo, and EdE for a run in ’10 rather than trading Homer, Thompson, and others for guys like Dye who will help us win 80 games next year.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 10:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mostly, what Charlie says
Bit I’d add a couple of things:
1. In general, I’d prefer they sniff around the free agents at this point. I just don’t think trading away young players (which is the vast majority of the team) is a smart move. Specifically, I’d consider AGon a sunk cost and go after Furcal.
2. Beltre makes sense if (1) they can sign him long term and (2) they have a plan for trading EdE. One year of Beltre makes zero sense, especially since they will have to give up some young talent to get him. Also, I’m not convinced EdE can hit enough to be an asset in LF if they do get Beltre (plus, what do you do with Votto if Alonzo hits as well as everyone assumes?).
3. The Reds do have an excess of #5 type starters; I’ve advocated in a number of posts that one or more be used as trade bait. Just not for 36 year old OFs.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the only reason
Dye and Dunn have similar wOPA over the past 3 seasons is because Dye had one phenomenal out-of-his-mind year back in ’06. as has been said before, their career OPS+ numbers (which are adjusted for league and park) are Dunn – 130, Dye – 112. its not close.
and getting that kind of production from your 5th starter is almost unheard of. i have high hopes for our rotation, but that is really asking a lot. i think Harang will rebound and Cueto will noticeably improve, but i dont see Volquez repeating his ’08 performance. he was pitching like a God for the first few months of the season, but the latter half of the year he was merely above average. i think an ERA around 4 for him is about right.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 5:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i should have read Sid's response first
he says it better. and with stats!
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 5:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
actually you
both are throwing out 06 as an outlier and then ignore 08 where Dye underperformed Dunn by a whopping 8 basis points which when you adjust for park and league gives you about the same offensive output.
So I guess you mean if you throw out 2 of the last 3 years no way can Dye match Dunn.
by davidmac84 on Nov 27, 2008 10:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
im not ignoring any information in my assessment of the situation
Dye has a career OPS+ of 112. Dunn’s is 130. Dunn is 6 years younger, has never missed any significant time to injury, is in his peak years of production, and is probably the closest thing to a sure thing in the league (40 homers, 100 walks, 100 RBIs every year for the past 5 seasons). Dye is 35, cant take a walk, and has 2 seasons out of 13 where his OPS+ is higher than Dunn’s career average.
also, reply’d.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 27, 2008 10:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mostly, what Charlie says
But I’d add this:
Since ‘02, Dunn’s first full season in the league, he’s had 2 seasons with an OPS+ under 121, with 114 being the lowest.; he also had fewer than 632 PA once in that time, with a low of 469 (in a year his OPS+ was still 116)
In that same time frame, Dye has 2 seasons over 121 (coincidently, both in the timeframe you’re quoting) while posting 4 of 110 or lower. He’s also had more than 600 PA twice in that time, with only 253 PA in ’03.
In other words, you’re comparing 3 average years for a hitter who’s going to be 29 next year with the best 3 year period in the 13 year career of a hitter who’s going to be 35.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 12:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here ya go
Since you’re using wOPA, let’s use it as intended.
From Fangraphs:
The other great advantage wOBA has is that it’s extremely easy to convert into run values. Simply take a player’s wOBA difference from the league average, divide by 1.15, and multiply that by how many plate appearances he got, and you have a run value above or below average for that player….wOBA – league average wOBA divided by 1.15 times plate appearances = runs above average by linear weights. Simple, easy, and accurate.
So I stuck the numbers in a spreadsheet, and guess what – Dunn was worth over 17 more runs than Dye over the past 3 years because (a) he has 150 more PA over that time, and (b) Dye’s ’07 was worth only 2.4 more runs than average.
wOPA Leag. ave. diff. PA RAA Dunn 2002 0.373 0.331 0.042 676 24.7 2003 0.353 0.332 0.021 469 8.6 2004 0.403 0.33 0.073 681 43.2 2005 0.391 0.33 0.061 671 35.6 2006 0.365 0.334 0.031 683 18.4 2007 0.399 0.334 0.065 632 35.7 2008 0.383 0.331 0.052 651 29.4 total 4463 195.6 '06-'08 1966 83.6 Dye 2002 0.344 0.331 0.013 555 6.3 2003 0.235 0.333 -0.098 253 -21.6 2004 0.338 0.338 0 590 0.0 2005 0.361 0.33 0.031 579 15.6 2006 0.417 0.339 0.078 611 41.4 2007 0.343 0.338 0.005 561 2.4 2008 0.376 0.336 0.04 645 22.4 total 3794 66.6 '06-'08 1817 66.3
More telling, if you look at both players from ‘02-08, Dunn’s been worth 195.6 runs above average, while Dye’s been worth 66.6 RAA. In fact, Dye was worth 0.3 RAA from ‘02-’05. Less than half a run of offense above average from 4 years of a crappy defensive corner OF.
THAT is why you cannot count on Dye to replace much of Dunn’s offense – Dye has 2 seasons in the last 7 worth more than 22 RAA and 4 worth less than 6.5 RAA (3 full seasons of 0-6.5, and an injury season of -21.6) while Dunn has 5 seasons worth more than 24.7, one worth 18.4, and an injured season still worth 8.6 RAA.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you just gave a perfect illustration why rate stats
are preferable to count stats when comparing players. wOPA neutralizes an event like 150 extra PA for Dunn which mean very little in forecasting both players .
Basically everthing in this thread is incorporated into the projection formulas and if you ave Marcell/Bill James- Dye projects out at .359 and Dunn .384. Dunn deserves that 25 basis point difference primarily because of his consistency but to state no way could Dye match Dunn’s performance given the close projections and the obvious fact Dye came within 8 basis points in the last year of our lord is scarily close to Dusty looking at pitcher and thinking he can see in his soul before he decides to leave him in for another 20 pitches.
by davidmac84 on Nov 29, 2008 9:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Please.
wOPA neutralizes an event like 150 extra PA for Dunn which mean very little in forecasting both players .
Which makes it good for projecting rate stats, but those extra PA are real, and have real value. Using the projections (which Marcel seems to hideously underestimate Dunn’s playing time, but I’ll still use that), Dunn will still have a 13 run advantage over Dye next year. That’s not close.
Dunn deserves that 25 basis point difference primarily because of his consistency
No, he deserves it because he’s a better player. Over the past 5 years, Dye has one year (his stupidly outlier ‘06) better than any of Dunn’s past five.
to state no way could Dye match Dunn’s performance given the close projections and the obvious fact Dye came within 8 basis points in the last year of our lord is scarily close to Dusty looking at pitcher and thinking he can see in his soul before he decides to leave him in for another 20 pitches.
I don’t have to “look into his soul”; I just have to look at the numbers. Dunn is a much, much better hitter than Dye, and barring injury there is a 0% chance Dye will be more valuable this year. Zero.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 8:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That last statement is silly
What are you guys even arguing about? I thought the question was whether Dye would replace Dunn from 2008, which was good but not great. Basically, could Dye put up 21 runs above average? It’s probably at the higher end of where we might expect, but I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility. But even if he does replace Dunn’s production from 2008, the Reds are still a shitty offense.
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK
Given the projections, a full year of Dye is worth only 14.6 RAA, and Dunn was about 21 RAA in a little over 4 months for the Reds last year (Dye, you’ll notice from above, has been more than 21 RAA twice in the past 7 years).
Let me rephrase: There is a near zero percent chance Dye will replace Dunn’s production from last year.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That last statement is still silly
Nothing in baseball has a zero percent chance of happening. Nothing. :)
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW
Most projections don’t take park into account, at least not at this point in the process (I think PECOTA might make some park adjustments). Dye wouldn’t likely get a boost in home runs (The Cell is a homer friendly park for right-handers), he might see a boost in doubles. GABP is the easiest park for righties in the NL to hit doubles and The Cell is one of the harder parks for righties to hit doubles. And yet, Dye still hit 41 doubles last year.
Again, the problem with all of this Dye talk is that even at his best he is simply replacing Dunn, and even with Dunn the Reds sucked.
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why
I said “near”.
CYA, baby.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There is one thing in baseball that has a zero percent chance of happening.
2009 NL MVP Corey P. Centerfield!

"My wife ain't never ran and got me no pheasant." - Fistbands
by BK on Dec 1, 2008 10:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't remember who suggested it
but I still really like the nickname: Corey 2 Pitch At Batterson
"Yes, and it's so important in this sport that the athletes be able to train in the same location." -Cynthia Potter, NBC Synchronized Diving Analyst
by 3 Fast 3 Furious on Dec 1, 2008 10:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice discourse, fellas!
It’s a pleasure to read such thoughtful exchanges here – especially in late November.

by PeteyHendrix on Nov 29, 2008 2:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Choir
Dye would be a good mid-season bat for a contender looking for a little more pop…give up a second-tier prospect for him. The Reds are probably not in the position of contender, barring future trades that improve the team. Trading for Dye would be a disaster, especially if you trade your top-shelf 22-year old prospect (with a few blemishes on him now) for a 35-year old LF who won’t help you win any more games. Best to stick with Bailey. Give him a sustained shot to work out his troubles as the 5th starter. If he blossoms, you can add him to Volquez and Cueto to form the most formidable young 3 in the NL.
by jamesp50014 on Nov 29, 2008 5:29 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
The Fay
thinks there’s something to the Dye rumor.
MLB Trade Rumors says there’s lots of interest in Griffey.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 29, 2008 9:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
MLB Trade Rumors
reports that BP thinks Homer Bailey is not enough to get Dye.
And that the Astros are after Paul Bako and David Ross.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 5:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
damn
you know, i think this thing could be a real measuring stick for my respect for and trust in Walt. i really hope i like him more in 2 months rather than less.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 30, 2008 8:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More on Dye
White Sox, Reds talking about Jermaine Dye
The winter meetings don’t start until Dec. 8, but the White Sox could act sooner in their quest to retool an aging and power-oriented roster.
But a major-league source said Sunday any deal involving right fielder Jermaine Dye and Cincinnati is complicated by financial matters.
Interesting. Maybe teams are watching their pennies closely, like Bud Selig told them to.
Yankees beat writer Pete Abe says it’s been really quiet on the hot stove front, partly because the economic crisis has teams reluctant to spend. He thinks this could mean some big deals going down at the Winter Meetings.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 10:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
very interesting
the Reds should have a little extra moolah to spend this offseason, even if they plan on keeping payroll around the same level as last year. im not even sure what this could mean. maybe the Reds want the Sox to eat some of the money? maybe they want the Sox to take on Freel or Gonzo to offset the cost?
also, the article mentions the Reds’ “wealth of talented pitchers”, and names Maloney and Roenicke as well as Homer. i wouldnt mind a deal of Maloney and Roenicke for Dye, for what that’s worth. but John Perrotto (the BP article is behind the pay wall) says it would take more than Homer to get Dye. woe is me.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 30, 2008 10:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don't get it either
Dye doesn’t make outrageous money by MLB standards. The Reds could afford him, without the Sox chipping in. (I don’t see the Sox chipping in. They are trying to cut payroll. That’s why they traded Swisher to the Yanks for the likes of Wilson Betemit.)
Does make you wonder if the Reds are trying to foist a Freel-type player on them.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More telling
Also thru MLBTR, the Sox would want more than Andy Sonnastine or Edwin Jackson.
I’m sorry, but it’s no wonder teams are hinging up on Kenny Williams. Walt should do the same.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Teams are watching their pennies, as Bubba Fan says
Its questionable if Arizona will offer Dunn arbitration. Could be a good time to pick up good talent relatively cheaply.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Sir Winston Churchill
by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 9:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dunn ain't coming back
Even if the Reds wanted him, why would he want to come back after his experience in Cincinnati?
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean to imply that Dunn would come back to the Reds
I was using his situation as an example that even the top HR hitter over the past 4 years is not going to get the payday that he thought he should get. Bad economic times are driving the price all commodities down including pro athletes. Ergo it is a good time to buy if you’ve got $$$$$$$$$. Bob has some money.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Sir Winston Churchill
by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 9:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think players with obvious flaws are going to have a hard time
but the top tier – CC, Teixeira, etc – are going to get paid large. The best thing for Dunn at this point may be to sit and wait for those guys to go off the market.
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They'll all get their money
It may not be for the years they want, but the guys like Dunn will be offered arbitration so they should get their money at least for one year.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder
The Yankees didn’t offer arbitration to any of their free agents. Not even Abreu.
The Dbacks might be afraid Dunn will accept their offer.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Dec 1, 2008 7:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shows what I know.
Lots of guys, including Dunn, weren’t offered arbitration. Of course, the DBacks did offer arbitration to 2 middle relievers.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Dec 2, 2008 9:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand the "will Dye replace Dunn?" debate.
It doesn’t matter, because Dunn is not on the team. He also wasn’t on the team at the end of last year. There is no offense to replace. It’s not like we were counting on Dunn’s production to be competitive next year.
The Question isn’t if Dye is going to replace Dunn’s offense, the question is “is Dye better than what we have now?” And I think the answer is a resounding most likely.
Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill
by chandrathan on Dec 1, 2008 11:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
the question is will Dye be enough to improve the Reds over last season
And the answer is a resounding “hey, is there still pie left from Thanksgiving?”
Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.
by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The question is:
Would Dye or Beltre ALONG WITH what other players will boost the Red’s total offense. I poasted earlier that I don’t expect one guy to replace all of Dunn’s offense. Will Bruce pick it up. Will Votto continue to improve? Will EdE finally have a career year. Will Gonzo even play? Can BP get it under control. What about Hannigan or C-Dick? Beltre/Dy/Whoever shouldn’t be looked as replacing Donkey but as an integral part of well thought out offensive scheme.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Sir Winston Churchill
by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 5:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn was a big part of the offense last year
and that production is now gone. so in order for the team to score runs like last year (and they werent very good then) we’ll have to bring in a player or players who can make up for the loss of Dunn’s production, and hopefully more. Dye is not that guy.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Dec 1, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























