Red Reporter: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Dye, Another Day

87946-004-a77b96a2_medium

I know everybody has probably already talked themselves to death on this subject in your pool halls and at the local watering hole, but I had technical difficulties yesterday that prevented me from joining in, so now I will say my part.

First, let's look at Jermaine Dye's numbers over the last 3 seasons:

YearPA HR RBI SB AVG OBP SLG wOBA RAR FRAR TtlVal
2006 611 44 120 7 .315 .385 .622 .417 56.5 -8.7 42.6
2007 561 28 78 2 .254 .317 .486 .343 15.2 -17.1 -6.7
2008 645 34 96 3 .292 .344 .541 .376 36.4 -7.0 24.0

NOTE: I've added a new column to the table.  Some of you may not be familiar with wOBA, but it stands for Weighted On Base Average and the short description is that it is a "runs per plate appearance" stat that has been adjusted to follow the OBP scale.  So, .335 is about average, .400 is very good, and Corey Patterson posted a .250 last season.  You can read more about wOBA here.

The first thing to point out about Dye is that 2006 is very much an outlier in his career.  The next highest slugging percentage for his career is .561, which he posted in 2000 with the Royals.  Those two seasons are the only time his OPS has been over .900 as well.  Not to say that Dye is a bad player, but we shouldn't expect him to be the guy he was in 2006.

What should we expect then?   Well, only two major forecasting systems have been freely released at this point, and both have him putting up very similar numbers:

SystemAVG OBP SLG OPS wOBA
Bill James
.270 .334 .491 .825 .357
Marcel .275 .337 .511 .847 .359

Defensively, Chone Smith projects him at about 6 plays below average in either corner outfield spot.

Dye may get a little bit of a boost offensively by moving to the NL, but I wouldn't expect him to be much better than he was last season, and he would have finished 5th on the Reds in Justin's Total Value rating.  So, I don't exactly think we're talking about a huge upgrade to the offense here.

So why would the Reds want him?  Well, for one thing, he kills left-handed pitching.  Over the last 3 seasons, his OPS against lefties has been 1.075, .925, and .917.  He'd definitely add some pop to the lineup.  He has the 8th most home runs in the Majors over the last 4 seasons.  He's got a ring.  Arroyo's the only other current Reds player that can say that.

The real question though is "What's the goal?"  Dye is owed $11.5 million in 2009 and has a $10 million option ($1 million buyout) for 2010.  Adding Dye alone to the lineup does not turn the Reds into contenders.  And while he adds some pop to the lineup, he does nothing to help the shoddy defense.  I've said before that Dye is the type of player that you pick up to turn your team into a finished product, not as your first move of the off-season. 

The Reds are several pieces away from a finished product right now.  If they had already acquired some players to solidify the infield defense and all they needed was a right-handed bat to round things out, I'd say go after Dye.  But bringing Dye in pretty much locks Encarnacion in at 3B, unless they trade him (and EdE's projections look a lot like Dye's).  Having an opening in LF gives the Reds the flexibility to be creative, but acquiring Dye would mean the Reds are using brute force to fill a hole.

I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not opposed to acquiring Dye.  He's a very good hitter and would definitely add something to the Reds lineup.  However, he wouldn't be the first move I make because acquiring an outfielder limits the team's options.  If Dye could put up Matt Holliday type numbers, I'd be all for it.  But since Dye's upside is essentially replacing Dunn's, offensively and defensively, I just don't find it to be the smart move at this point.

0 recs  |  Comment 65 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Red Reporter

The Farmies, part 2

Oct 2009 by nycredsfan - 27 comments

Names of interest, or not

Nov 2008 by Slyde - 114 comments

Around SB Nation

Friday Afternoon Quick Hits

Nov 2009 from MLB Daily Dish - 0 comments

White Sox acquire Mark Teahen

Nov 2009 from MLB Daily Dish - 3 comments

Rosterbation-Mania!

Nov 2009 from South Side Sox - 234 comments

Comments

Display:

Agreed

As others have said, Dye isn’t worth the money plus Homer for where this team is at. But Dye is still a good hitter, and a Dye/Dickerson platoon in LF could be interesting. I might go for it if the Sox were only asking for a pittance or were wiling to pay a good chunk of Dye’s salary.

Also, if we’re looking for relief help, there’s a certain unreliable lefthander available. Eric Milton, if you’re too lazy to link.

by ken on Nov 26, 2008 11:52 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Sign Juan Rivera instead.

I like Jermaine Dye, but Rivera provides a RH bat and a solid glove in LF. In a full season he’s capable of 20+ HR. He’s said to be asking for $6-8 for two years and won’t cost a player nor a prospect. Rivera’s five years younger than Dye and, at least in my opinion, is underrated.

We Are ... Marshall!

by Thundering Turtle on Nov 26, 2008 1:21 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

i was thinking the same thing. i dont understand Walt’s preference for trade over free agency. they call it “free” agency because it doesnt cost you any prospects. or something like that.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Two things worry me about Rivera

First, his line drive rate is at 15.8% for his career and was just 14.3% last year. I’d really rather see that number up around 19% or higher.

Second, his walk rate is at Brandon Phillips levels. In fact, his hitting numbers look a lot like BP’s. That’s great if he’s playing gold glove level 2B, but for an average corner outfielder I’m not that interested.

Personally I’d rather they either signed Milton Bradley, a hitter who might have some serious game changing ability, or traded for David Dejesus, a relatively cheap hitter who could still provide some decent production.

Actually, I’d rather they focused on the infield first, but if they are going after outfielders, that’s who I’d pursue.

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Nov 26, 2008 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DeJesus I like.

I’m just not convinced Bradley can stay healthy, or even thinks he can stay healthy, playing in the NL.

We Are ... Marshall!

by Thundering Turtle on Nov 26, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The biggest problem with Bradley...

Has a lot to do with what he thinks. He has the potential to really be a guy opposing managers have to take into account in every game, but he has been a real headcase.

Like I said in the other thread, if he takes his Ritalin, he would be a much beter acquisition than Dye, and it would cost nothing but money, which is replaceable. You figure you could sign Bradley for something on the order of $23 million for two years (which is what you’d owe Dye anyway if you traded for him).

Hey Dusty...Are you sure you're OK? You might need an MRI.

by Paul Householder on Nov 26, 2008 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder.....

Dusty is a “player’s manager”, would that help with someone like Bradley?

"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."

by jch24 on Nov 26, 2008 10:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You said it man

Nobody fucks with DeJesus. And I’d also pass on Bradley because he won’t stay healthy in this league.

by ken on Nov 26, 2008 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

God I hope we get him just for that reason

I want to say “Nobody fucks with DeJesus” as much as possible over the next two years

Are there any more dinner rolls? -President Ted Kennedy

by The Crushinator on Nov 26, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't imagine why the Royals would part with DeJesus

What could the Reds give ’em? They need a 2b, for certain…and some OF/pitching prospects? I feel like with what they would trade for DeJesus that the Royals could possibly accept…they ought to just gun for Beltre.

*This is all moot if someone else gets Beltre.

...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield

by Cy Schourek on Nov 26, 2008 9:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DeJesus is a weak bat for LF

And with Crisp, they could be looking to move him. But yeah, not sure what it would take to get him.

by ken on Nov 28, 2008 9:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wha?
In fact, his hitting numbers look a lot like BP’s.

Even after a disastrous ‘07 and ’08, Rivera’s career OPS+ is 20 points higher than BP’s. His BA and OBP are about 20 points higher and his SLG is 40 points higher; pre-injury, the difference is even more striking (another 10 points of each).

He isn’t a GG 2B, but he hits alot better than BP.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Nov 26, 2008 4:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

correction

he hit a lot better than BP. I’d be shocked if he ever puts up numbers like he did in 2004 and 2006 again, and those seasons are what boost his career numbers. With his line drive and walk rate, he’s going to need a lot of luck to put up his career average line again.

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Nov 26, 2008 5:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

is there a reason

that every time I see “Juan Rivera” I think “Ruben Sierra” and can’t figure out why the Reds want such a retread?

...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield

by Cy Schourek on Nov 26, 2008 9:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just don't mistake him

for Ruben Rivera.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Nov 26, 2008 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't this like the fourth team that's hired him since he was with the reds?

Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill

by chandrathan on Nov 26, 2008 2:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Time for the O's

To sign another catcher…

Hey Dusty...Are you sure you're OK? You might need an MRI.

by Paul Householder on Nov 26, 2008 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lets send him a congratulatory present...

such as a certain toothpick chewing manager.

Nobody listens to Andrew

by nlt-andrew68 on Nov 26, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In what world...

Does Dye replace Dunn offensively? Dunn’s career OPS+ is 130. Dye’s is 112. Also, as much as everyone likes to talk about how much Dunn stinks in the field, everything I’ve seen has him rated as average to slightly above average for his performance last year., which is pretty much my perception. From what I’ve seen he’s noticeably improved in the field over the last few years.

by Jason461 on Nov 26, 2008 3:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

One player will not sufficiently replace Dunn's offensive output.

However the lack of leadoff Corey and that crusher Bako, with reduced time from Kepp will allow for some other combo of players to help make up for and maybe even better donkey’s lost offense.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Sir Winston Churchill

by Madville on Nov 26, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

their rolling wOPA for the last 3 years

is very close for Dunn and Dye. With Adam having 382 to 378 advantage- with adjustments for park and league for the 3 year period they are almost exactly equal offensively.
Of course because of Adams consistency and being younger deserves the higher projection- but its certainly not out of the realm of possibility that Jermaine could replace almost all of Dunn’s offensive value with slightly better defensive.
If the Reds dont lose to much offense replacing Adam, they are looking at gains in CF, RF, SS, hopefully catcher. with the other positions should be neutral.
On the defensive side- the Reds had their 5th starters go for an 8 ERA in around 150 innings.
Harang up about 1 run per 9 because of Dusty’s stupidity and a couple young arms with plus 8k per 9 averages in their 1st full MLB season.
So with Dye I could see an offense 20-30 runs better/ defense 70-80 runs better(5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone). And that at least starts to get you into the conversation of the wild card. The Reds would need one more move or a couple huge move upward moves in performance- but I dont see why Dye cannot be that first move.

by davidmac84 on Nov 26, 2008 4:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Point

About the last 3 years. I’d still take Dunn because of his age (which you noted) and also because is OBP is much higher than Dye’s. I think the place this team most needs to improve is OBP and while I think that will improve just because Patterson won’t be trying to set a record for most outs per plate appearance, I’ll almost always take a higher OBP guy over a higher SLG guy. But, really, I think we’re pretty much in agreement here. I wouldn’t mind seeing Dye here, I just think there are probably some better options.

by Jason461 on Nov 26, 2008 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uh, ok
With Adam having 382 to 378 advantage- with adjustments for park and league for the 3 year period they are almost exactly equal offensively…its certainly not out of the realm of possibility that Jermaine could replace almost all of Dunn’s offensive value

Dye’s OPS+:151, 106, 126. Career 112.
Dunn’s: 114, 136, 129. Career 130.
Even without knowing their ages, there is no way I anticipate Dye to come anywhere close to Dunn’s offensive value next year. No way.

If the Reds dont lose to much offense replacing Adam, they are looking at gains in..SS.

Thanks to Hairston’s career year, the Reds were actually pretty close to league-average at SS last year.

a couple young arms with plus 8k per 9 averages in their 1st full MLB season.

As was pointed out after the ROY voting, Volquez wasn’t a rookie last year. Also, there is no way he repeats his 3.21 ERA next year. No way.

5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone

First, it’d take 45 runs over the 189 2/3 IP from the 5th starters to get to an ERA of 5; 2nd, no team can really expect that kind of performance from their 5th starters. You know how many teams whose top 5 starters all had ERA+ over 90? Three – the Rays, Angels and Flubs.

So with Dye I could see an offense 20-30 runs better/ defense 70-80 runs better(5th starter with an era around 5 will save you around 40 runs alone). And that at least starts to get you into the conversation of the wild card.

No, that gets you to 83 wins. The fewest wins by a wild card team in a non-strike season is 88, by the ‘96 O’s and ’06 Dodgers.

The Reds would need one more move or a couple huge move upward moves in performance- but I dont see why Dye cannot be that first move.

Because there are other moves that make a ton more sense because (1) the player is cheaper, (2) the player is likely better, (3) the player is available as a free agent, or (4) some combination of those.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Nov 26, 2008 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So Sid, What are the other available moves that you see as beter than Dye or Belre?

Remembering that you usually don’t get something for nothing who would you give up and who would you go for?

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Sir Winston Churchill

by Madville on Nov 26, 2008 8:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i cant speak for Sid

but i dont think the Reds should make any moves where they surrender prospects for veterans. as has been belabored for a few days here, this team is more than just a few pieces away from contending. i would prefer they sit tight and let the team grow a bit, but i’d also rather they trade vets than trade prospects. i would rather trade BP, Arroyo, and EdE for a run in ’10 rather than trading Homer, Thompson, and others for guys like Dye who will help us win 80 games next year.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 10:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mostly, what Charlie says

Bit I’d add a couple of things:

1. In general, I’d prefer they sniff around the free agents at this point. I just don’t think trading away young players (which is the vast majority of the team) is a smart move. Specifically, I’d consider AGon a sunk cost and go after Furcal.
2. Beltre makes sense if (1) they can sign him long term and (2) they have a plan for trading EdE. One year of Beltre makes zero sense, especially since they will have to give up some young talent to get him. Also, I’m not convinced EdE can hit enough to be an asset in LF if they do get Beltre (plus, what do you do with Votto if Alonzo hits as well as everyone assumes?).
3. The Reds do have an excess of #5 type starters; I’ve advocated in a number of posts that one or more be used as trade bait. Just not for 36 year old OFs.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the only reason

Dye and Dunn have similar wOPA over the past 3 seasons is because Dye had one phenomenal out-of-his-mind year back in ’06. as has been said before, their career OPS+ numbers (which are adjusted for league and park) are Dunn – 130, Dye – 112. its not close.

and getting that kind of production from your 5th starter is almost unheard of. i have high hopes for our rotation, but that is really asking a lot. i think Harang will rebound and Cueto will noticeably improve, but i dont see Volquez repeating his ’08 performance. he was pitching like a God for the first few months of the season, but the latter half of the year he was merely above average. i think an ERA around 4 for him is about right.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 26, 2008 5:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

actually you

both are throwing out 06 as an outlier and then ignore 08 where Dye underperformed Dunn by a whopping 8 basis points which when you adjust for park and league gives you about the same offensive output.
So I guess you mean if you throw out 2 of the last 3 years no way can Dye match Dunn.

by davidmac84 on Nov 27, 2008 10:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

im not ignoring any information in my assessment of the situation

Dye has a career OPS+ of 112. Dunn’s is 130. Dunn is 6 years younger, has never missed any significant time to injury, is in his peak years of production, and is probably the closest thing to a sure thing in the league (40 homers, 100 walks, 100 RBIs every year for the past 5 seasons). Dye is 35, cant take a walk, and has 2 seasons out of 13 where his OPS+ is higher than Dunn’s career average.

also, reply’d.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 27, 2008 10:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mostly, what Charlie says

But I’d add this:

Since ‘02, Dunn’s first full season in the league, he’s had 2 seasons with an OPS+ under 121, with 114 being the lowest.; he also had fewer than 632 PA once in that time, with a low of 469 (in a year his OPS+ was still 116)

In that same time frame, Dye has 2 seasons over 121 (coincidently, both in the timeframe you’re quoting) while posting 4 of 110 or lower. He’s also had more than 600 PA twice in that time, with only 253 PA in ’03.

In other words, you’re comparing 3 average years for a hitter who’s going to be 29 next year with the best 3 year period in the 13 year career of a hitter who’s going to be 35.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 12:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here ya go

Since you’re using wOPA, let’s use it as intended.

From Fangraphs:

The other great advantage wOBA has is that it’s extremely easy to convert into run values. Simply take a player’s wOBA difference from the league average, divide by 1.15, and multiply that by how many plate appearances he got, and you have a run value above or below average for that player….wOBA – league average wOBA divided by 1.15 times plate appearances = runs above average by linear weights. Simple, easy, and accurate.

So I stuck the numbers in a spreadsheet, and guess what – Dunn was worth over 17 more runs than Dye over the past 3 years because (a) he has 150 more PA over that time, and (b) Dye’s ’07 was worth only 2.4 more runs than average.

		wOPA	Leag. ave. diff.	PA	RAA
Dunn	2002	0.373	0.331	0.042	676	24.7
	2003	0.353	0.332	0.021	469	8.6
	2004	0.403	0.33	0.073	681	43.2
	2005	0.391	0.33	0.061	671	35.6
	2006	0.365	0.334	0.031	683	18.4
	2007	0.399	0.334	0.065	632	35.7
	2008	0.383	0.331	0.052	651	29.4

				total	4463	195.6
				'06-'08	1966	83.6

Dye	2002	0.344	0.331	0.013	555	6.3
	2003	0.235	0.333	-0.098	253	-21.6
	2004	0.338	0.338	0	590	0.0
	2005	0.361	0.33	0.031	579	15.6
	2006	0.417	0.339	0.078	611	41.4
	2007	0.343	0.338	0.005	561	2.4
	2008	0.376	0.336	0.04	645	22.4

				total	3794	66.6
				'06-'08	1817	66.3

More telling, if you look at both players from ‘02-08, Dunn’s been worth 195.6 runs above average, while Dye’s been worth 66.6 RAA. In fact, Dye was worth 0.3 RAA from ‘02-’05. Less than half a run of offense above average from 4 years of a crappy defensive corner OF.

THAT is why you cannot count on Dye to replace much of Dunn’s offense – Dye has 2 seasons in the last 7 worth more than 22 RAA and 4 worth less than 6.5 RAA (3 full seasons of 0-6.5, and an injury season of -21.6) while Dunn has 5 seasons worth more than 24.7, one worth 18.4, and an injured season still worth 8.6 RAA.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Nov 28, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you just gave a perfect illustration why rate stats

are preferable to count stats when comparing players. wOPA neutralizes an event like 150 extra PA for Dunn which mean very little in forecasting both players .
Basically everthing in this thread is incorporated into the projection formulas and if you ave Marcell/Bill James- Dye projects out at .359 and Dunn .384. Dunn deserves that 25 basis point difference primarily because of his consistency but to state no way could Dye match Dunn’s performance given the close projections and the obvious fact Dye came within 8 basis points in the last year of our lord is scarily close to Dusty looking at pitcher and thinking he can see in his soul before he decides to leave him in for another 20 pitches.

by davidmac84 on Nov 29, 2008 9:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Please.
wOPA neutralizes an event like 150 extra PA for Dunn which mean very little in forecasting both players .

Which makes it good for projecting rate stats, but those extra PA are real, and have real value. Using the projections (which Marcel seems to hideously underestimate Dunn’s playing time, but I’ll still use that), Dunn will still have a 13 run advantage over Dye next year. That’s not close.

Dunn deserves that 25 basis point difference primarily because of his consistency

No, he deserves it because he’s a better player. Over the past 5 years, Dye has one year (his stupidly outlier ‘06) better than any of Dunn’s past five.

to state no way could Dye match Dunn’s performance given the close projections and the obvious fact Dye came within 8 basis points in the last year of our lord is scarily close to Dusty looking at pitcher and thinking he can see in his soul before he decides to leave him in for another 20 pitches.

I don’t have to “look into his soul”; I just have to look at the numbers. Dunn is a much, much better hitter than Dye, and barring injury there is a 0% chance Dye will be more valuable this year. Zero.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 8:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That last statement is silly

What are you guys even arguing about? I thought the question was whether Dye would replace Dunn from 2008, which was good but not great. Basically, could Dye put up 21 runs above average? It’s probably at the higher end of where we might expect, but I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility. But even if he does replace Dunn’s production from 2008, the Reds are still a shitty offense.

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK

Given the projections, a full year of Dye is worth only 14.6 RAA, and Dunn was about 21 RAA in a little over 4 months for the Reds last year (Dye, you’ll notice from above, has been more than 21 RAA twice in the past 7 years).

Let me rephrase: There is a near zero percent chance Dye will replace Dunn’s production from last year.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That last statement is still silly

Nothing in baseball has a zero percent chance of happening. Nothing. :)

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Most projections don’t take park into account, at least not at this point in the process (I think PECOTA might make some park adjustments). Dye wouldn’t likely get a boost in home runs (The Cell is a homer friendly park for right-handers), he might see a boost in doubles. GABP is the easiest park for righties in the NL to hit doubles and The Cell is one of the harder parks for righties to hit doubles. And yet, Dye still hit 41 doubles last year.

Again, the problem with all of this Dye talk is that even at his best he is simply replacing Dunn, and even with Dunn the Reds sucked.

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Which is why

I said “near”.

CYA, baby.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There is one thing in baseball that has a zero percent chance of happening.

2009 NL MVP Corey P. Centerfield!

"My wife ain't never ran and got me no pheasant." - Fistbands

by BK on Dec 1, 2008 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't remember who suggested it

but I still really like the nickname: Corey 2 Pitch At Batterson

"Yes, and it's so important in this sport that the athletes be able to train in the same location." -Cynthia Potter, NBC Synchronized Diving Analyst

by 3 Fast 3 Furious on Dec 1, 2008 10:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice discourse, fellas!

It’s a pleasure to read such thoughtful exchanges here – especially in late November.

by PeteyHendrix on Nov 29, 2008 2:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The Choir

Dye would be a good mid-season bat for a contender looking for a little more pop…give up a second-tier prospect for him. The Reds are probably not in the position of contender, barring future trades that improve the team. Trading for Dye would be a disaster, especially if you trade your top-shelf 22-year old prospect (with a few blemishes on him now) for a 35-year old LF who won’t help you win any more games. Best to stick with Bailey. Give him a sustained shot to work out his troubles as the 5th starter. If he blossoms, you can add him to Volquez and Cueto to form the most formidable young 3 in the NL.

by jamesp50014 on Nov 29, 2008 5:29 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

This is what I want to do. I’m not sure Bailey will ever figure it out here if at all, but we have to give him every chance before giving up.

"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."

by jch24 on Nov 29, 2008 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Fay

thinks there’s something to the Dye rumor.

MLB Trade Rumors says there’s lots of interest in Griffey.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Nov 29, 2008 9:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

MLB Trade Rumors

reports that BP thinks Homer Bailey is not enough to get Dye.

And that the Astros are after Paul Bako and David Ross.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 5:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

damn

you know, i think this thing could be a real measuring stick for my respect for and trust in Walt. i really hope i like him more in 2 months rather than less.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 30, 2008 8:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

More on Dye

White Sox, Reds talking about Jermaine Dye

The winter meetings don’t start until Dec. 8, but the White Sox could act sooner in their quest to retool an aging and power-oriented roster.

But a major-league source said Sunday any deal involving right fielder Jermaine Dye and Cincinnati is complicated by financial matters.

Interesting. Maybe teams are watching their pennies closely, like Bud Selig told them to.

Yankees beat writer Pete Abe says it’s been really quiet on the hot stove front, partly because the economic crisis has teams reluctant to spend. He thinks this could mean some big deals going down at the Winter Meetings.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

very interesting

the Reds should have a little extra moolah to spend this offseason, even if they plan on keeping payroll around the same level as last year. im not even sure what this could mean. maybe the Reds want the Sox to eat some of the money? maybe they want the Sox to take on Freel or Gonzo to offset the cost?

also, the article mentions the Reds’ “wealth of talented pitchers”, and names Maloney and Roenicke as well as Homer. i wouldnt mind a deal of Maloney and Roenicke for Dye, for what that’s worth. but John Perrotto (the BP article is behind the pay wall) says it would take more than Homer to get Dye. woe is me.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Nov 30, 2008 10:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I don't get it either

Dye doesn’t make outrageous money by MLB standards. The Reds could afford him, without the Sox chipping in. (I don’t see the Sox chipping in. They are trying to cut payroll. That’s why they traded Swisher to the Yanks for the likes of Wilson Betemit.)

Does make you wonder if the Reds are trying to foist a Freel-type player on them.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Nov 30, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

More telling

Also thru MLBTR, the Sox would want more than Andy Sonnastine or Edwin Jackson.

I’m sorry, but it’s no wonder teams are hinging up on Kenny Williams. Walt should do the same.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Teams are watching their pennies, as Bubba Fan says

Its questionable if Arizona will offer Dunn arbitration. Could be a good time to pick up good talent relatively cheaply.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Sir Winston Churchill

by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 9:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Dunn ain't coming back

Even if the Reds wanted him, why would he want to come back after his experience in Cincinnati?

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't mean to imply that Dunn would come back to the Reds

I was using his situation as an example that even the top HR hitter over the past 4 years is not going to get the payday that he thought he should get. Bad economic times are driving the price all commodities down including pro athletes. Ergo it is a good time to buy if you’ve got $$$$$$$$$. Bob has some money.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Sir Winston Churchill

by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think players with obvious flaws are going to have a hard time

but the top tier – CC, Teixeira, etc – are going to get paid large. The best thing for Dunn at this point may be to sit and wait for those guys to go off the market.

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 9:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They'll all get their money

It may not be for the years they want, but the guys like Dunn will be offered arbitration so they should get their money at least for one year.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 1, 2008 9:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder

The Yankees didn’t offer arbitration to any of their free agents. Not even Abreu.

The Dbacks might be afraid Dunn will accept their offer.

All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?

by BubbaFan on Dec 1, 2008 7:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Shows what I know.

Lots of guys, including Dunn, weren’t offered arbitration. Of course, the DBacks did offer arbitration to 2 middle relievers.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Dec 2, 2008 9:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand the "will Dye replace Dunn?" debate.

It doesn’t matter, because Dunn is not on the team. He also wasn’t on the team at the end of last year. There is no offense to replace. It’s not like we were counting on Dunn’s production to be competitive next year.

The Question isn’t if Dye is going to replace Dunn’s offense, the question is “is Dye better than what we have now?” And I think the answer is a resounding most likely.

Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill

by chandrathan on Dec 1, 2008 11:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

the question is will Dye be enough to improve the Reds over last season

And the answer is a resounding “hey, is there still pie left from Thanksgiving?”

Why have I been blogging for so long? It's certainly not because of the paycheck. Because I could be making a lot more money as a doctor or a professional athlete.

by Slyde on Dec 1, 2008 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The question is:

Would Dye or Beltre ALONG WITH what other players will boost the Red’s total offense. I poasted earlier that I don’t expect one guy to replace all of Dunn’s offense. Will Bruce pick it up. Will Votto continue to improve? Will EdE finally have a career year. Will Gonzo even play? Can BP get it under control. What about Hannigan or C-Dick? Beltre/Dy/Whoever shouldn’t be looked as replacing Donkey but as an integral part of well thought out offensive scheme.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Sir Winston Churchill

by Madville on Dec 1, 2008 5:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dunn was a big part of the offense last year

and that production is now gone. so in order for the team to score runs like last year (and they werent very good then) we’ll have to bring in a player or players who can make up for the loss of Dunn’s production, and hopefully more. Dye is not that guy.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Dec 1, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Cincinnati Reds. Community Guidlines
Start posting about the Reds »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Supercam_small
Sunny Sunday Open Thread
Redandblue_small
Technology replacing Umpires
Uh-doi_small
RR Burger Tour Stop - highlifeman21, you owe me a burger
Spartans_small
tHan's CHI/CIN game thread
Spartans_small
SIS - best songs by certain bands edition
Spartans_small
Strongest Reds Position Historically
Leopold_butter_scotch_southpark_small
Beware History
Small
08 REDS v. 09 REDS
Small
Win Chance to Hang With Bronson Arroyo!!!!!!!!!1
Spartans_small
Herb &Thelma's burger recap

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Marmolejo suspended for using performance-enhancing drugs
Dude!!!! Lincecum busted for pot.
God I'm bored
Byrnes, D-Backs close to split
Mike Leake (1.04, 2 BB, 6 SO) is doing well in the Arizona Fall League, Trailing is this year's First Round Draft Prick. (6.97, 4 BB, 11 SO)
Mark McGwire hired as Cardinals hitting coach
John Wall ends tHan's mancrush
Just cuz you're going to the World Series doesn't mean you're not still a gigantic scumbag.  Incremental karmic payback is delicious!
Steve Phillips has a Birthmark on his Crotch
Pete Harnisch Pitches the Reds back into First Place

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Manager

Redsmouth_small Slyde

Bench Coaches

Uh-doi_small jch24

Burger-king_small BK

Ken_fish_called_wanda_small ken

Happyhanukkah_small Brendanukkah

417898_small Gray

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Baseballbugs-thumb_small Charlie Scrabbles

Miles_small nycredsfan

Beat Reporters

Adelieicon_small andromache

Small riverfront76