Who would you trade to get Brian Roberts?
Steve Ruark/AP |
Brian Roberts
Secondbaseman |
Okay, so there didn't seem to be too much interest in Adrian Beltre. How about we up the ante a little bit? Brian Roberts was linked to frequent rumors last Spring with the Chicago Cubs. At the time it was rumored that the Orioles were looking to trade most of their veterans, but no real deals went through. The latest rumors on Roberts are mixed as some say he's working on an extension with the Orioles and others say he's available for the right deal.
Positives: He's pretty much everything you could want in a second baseman. His defense is solid and he has an excellent bat. His on-base skill and his speed make him a perfect fit for the lead-off spot. His skills remind me a lot of Barry Larkin. Not coincidentally, Larkin is his #4 comp on Baseball Reference.
Negatives: Trading for Roberts would force a move of Brandon Phillips to shortstop, which some might not like, but I support. Such a move would require the Reds to either eat or dump Alex Gonzalez's $5.4 million contract. Being that Roberts is an All Star caliber player, his cost might likely be too high to be worth trading for just one year of service. His name was included in the Mitchell Report.
Possible Alternatives: Orlando Hudson (Free Agent), Rafael Furcal (Free Agent), Jerry Hairston (Free Agent), David Eckstein (Free Agent), Adam Kennedy (STL),
Fun Fact: His .516 OPS against the Reds is the second lowest against any team for Roberts (behind STL - .333). Just think of how much better he'll hit when he doesn't have to face the Reds pitchers 14 times over his next 4000+ plate appearances
Who would you be willing to give up to acquire Roberts? Would you want the deal to include a contract extension right off the bat? If you think he's worth acquiring, try to make your deal suggestions realistic from the Orioles perspective. If you don't think he's worth acquiring, is it because you think the Reds are set in the middle infield or because you don't particularly want Roberts?
0 recs |
43 comments
Comments
I like this move
He gives us a leadoff hitter which we badly need. He improves our D up the middle which we badly need (assuming that BP can handle the move to SS – a big IF, I know). It gives us a lineup that looks like this:
Roberts
Phillips
Bruce
Votto
EdE
Dickerson
??
Hanigan
Pitcher
That is not a World Series winning lineup, but its closer to it than we had last year. If the Reds are going to make the post-season in the next few years, it will be behind our pitching. I like our Top4 starters and am willing to bet on them. We do need to hope some young guys step up to take care of the bullpen. We just need our offense to score enough to win games. We don’t need to score 7-8 runs a game anymore to win. Roberts at the top of the order should help us manufacture more runs.
How to get Roberts? I would be willing to part with Homer Bailey. I think I’ve lost faith in him getting it done in a Reds uniform. But is he an attractive prospect ? I would still think so. How high is his trade value? I think he’s our number one bait to getting one of our holes in the field filled.
The season doesn't start until the Cincinnati Reds take the field! Reclaim The Opener!!
by TheC on Oct 28, 2008 9:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You may want to sit down
This is a move I could get behind.
1. He gets on base alot – .372 OBP over the past 4 seasons.
2. He plays solid defense.
3. He’s stolen 226 bases at a 79% clip.
I would make the same arguement about the current roster that I did arguing for Ellis: Moving BP to SS and bringing in a solid defensive 2B helps the defense alot. Keeping AGon isn’t the worst move – he can reasonably sub at 3B or SS, and if a 2B is needed BP can slyde back over there. There’s no need to trade/dump/release him.
The Cubs apparently (according to the Baltimore Sun, via MBLTR) (the original article doesn’t appear to be available any more) offered Donnie Veal (a 23 year old pitcher who isn’t very good), Sean Gallagher (a 22 year old who’s mirroring Homer Bailey (MiLB success, MLB struggles) so far), and Ronny Cedeno (a no-hit middle infielder); Andy McPhail said “no thanks”.
Ah, but Roberts is a whole year closer to free agency; the O’s might not be so flippant now. Would a package including one of Homer/Thompson/Maloney/Ramirez, either Cozart/Rosales, and Dorn get it done? And if given the chance to negotiate an extension, I’d throw in a 2nd pitcher from the above list. As a bonus for the Reds, AGon would be off the books when the extension money kicks in.
As for the alternatives:
Hudson – likely to be much more expensive for not as good of a player, and is coming off an injury.
Furcal – I’d have no problem signing him, but every indication is he’s staying in LA.
Hairston – Sorry, Cherry, but I’m guessing creating twice as many runs per 27 outs as your career average, at age 32, is something of an outlier. You also suck defensively. In hindsight, I can’t believe you weren’t traded at the deadline this year.
Eckstein, Kennedy – The “scrappy white guy” role is already filled unless we dump Freel on someone.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 9:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can I be the RR 'scrappy white guy'
I need something to hang my hat on.
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're a pacificist
kick someone’s ass and we’ll start considering about your “scrappy” status.
Then 'twas the Roman, now 'tis I.
by Man Mountain on Oct 28, 2008 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...fer days
Then 'twas the Roman, now 'tis I.
by Man Mountain on Oct 28, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am intrigued by your offer
And will consider it, especially should the corporate downsizing gnomes come to visit.
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
too tall to be scrappy
so no
Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill
by chandrathan on Oct 28, 2008 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you can the scrappy guy
but im already the Scrabbly guy. this move to push RR dangerously close to roster redundancy.
"If you don't get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what's gonna happen to you? You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company."
by Charlie Scrabbles on Oct 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty much down with anything that gets Keppinger out of the starting SS position
If I remember, when the Reds were briefly in on the Erik Bedard sweepstakes, the Orioles kept demanding the moon, with a package that started with Jay Bruce. Now, Brian Roberts isn’t an ace pitcher, but he is an All-Star second baseman. Would it be reasonable to assume that the Orioles might again demand an unreasonable haul for him?
I like Roberts. I also liked Beltre. It’s just very clear that our infield needs to be upgraded pretty substantially. And our outfield. And Hanigan’s not making any All-Star team.
by Brendanukkah on Oct 28, 2008 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course they should
Would it be reasonable to assume that the Orioles might again demand an unreasonable haul for him?
I would absolutely expect them to demand an unreasonable haul; if not, they’re not doing their jobs. The real question is, how available is he? His final price will be determined by how much the O’s want to move him.
As for Bedard, (1) he was still arb-eligible (and appears to still have one more arb year left), (2) they accepted much less than a package starting with Bruce, and (3) that trade was still seen as way overpaying by Seattle.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The haul for Bedard
The difference is that Bedard was a 29-year old frontline starter with 2 years of arbitration left. Yes, Roberts is an All Star 2B, but he’s also 2 years old than Bedard and only under contract for one more season at $8 million a year. That’s not to say that Roberts won’t be expensive, but I think the Reds might have enough depth to get him. I think a package starting with Bailey or Thompson would get things moving. I’d be willing to give up Dorn and if they can sign him before the deal, I’d throw in Valaika. If not then I’d go with Justin Turner and someone like Sean Watson.
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do this
and I sit down with Roberts immediately to sign him to an extension.
I expect the Orioles to ask for Cueto and/or Votto up front. They’re pretty set in the outfield with Adam Jones and Nick Markakis, who they’re about to sign to an extension. Their pitching is fairly young, but, outside of Jeremy Guthrie, it kind of sucks.
The most important aspect of this trade, however, is that the O’s are old around the infield and the Reds look to have great depth in infield hitters moving along in the system. That’s where trading with the Reds makes sense for them.
So, I counter with Thompson and then tell the O’s they can have the pick of any two Reds infield prospects excluding Frazier and Soto. So Valaika/Francisco/Cozart/Rosales/Turner are all on the table.
I still think Bailey is going to be a successful major league pitcher, but I’d be willing to include him in this trade in place of Thompson. If they have any interest in Ramirez and/or Maloney all the better. Thinking about it a little more, if they want Homer, I hedge a little on which of the infielders I offer.
For the Reds not only do you have a legitimate on base threat in Brian Roberts, but you have a very marketable player to the Reds fan base…a player who is actually worth their admiration. That would make a nice change.
I suppose I should worry about the Reds putting money and years into a player on the wrong side of 30, but I think Roberts will continue to be solid well into his 30s.
Then 'twas the Roman, now 'tis I.
by Man Mountain on Oct 28, 2008 12:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, would 5-yr/60 million be acceptable on both sides?
with an option or two? My big doubt on re-signing Roberts is not the money, I think the Reds could afford him. It’s the fact that Roberts may not be so interested in signing with the Reds, who don’t exactly have a history of success – in case you haven’t noticed. As for his age, I’m not too worried, as long as the deal stays at 5 guaranteed years or less. Roberts has been reasonably healthy his whole career and high-OBP players tend to age well, I believe. I think he’ll be a safe bet until age 35 or maybe even later.
I wouldn’t include Votto unless Roberts is signed and I wouldn’t trade Cueto at all. I understand though that the Orioles are going to ask for those types of players. I think you can make the argument that players like Votto and Cueto don’t get dealt for one year rentals. And trading Votto pretty much cancels out any offensive value gained by acquiring Roberts, so unless he’s signed, it’s a foolish deal. (Not that you said you’d trade him, just emphasizing that it doesn’t make sense).
Pitching-wise, they have Chris Tillman, who may be ready next year some time, but looks very similar numbers-wise to Homer Bailey at the same age. They’ve also got David Hernandez who is similar, but 3-years older. I think Bailey might be attractive to them because of his talent and still young age. I think Matt Maloney could add some left-handed depth to their organization – not that the Reds have a lot themselves. And like you said, I think the Reds are strong in the minors where the Orioles are weak. Depending on who the primary piece is in the deal, the Reds could give up a couple of their infield prospects and still have some depth.
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We may not have a history of success
But we’re a lot better poised to be successful than the Orioles are, simply by virtue of our division. The Orioles were going to have a hard time catching the Blue Jays, let alone the Yanks and Red Sox, to say nothing of the Rays. Houston and St. Louis are likely to regress, Milwaukee is going to lose Sheets, Sabathia, or both, and the Cubs are the Cubs. The Reds can make some noise next year, and Brian Roberts can help us do it.
by Brendanukkah on Oct 28, 2008 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reality sucks
Roberts may not be so interested in signing with the Reds
Roberts also has a limited no trade clause to “a small number of teams” (according to Cots).
Even if he can block the trade, it doesn’t hurt to ask.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second...
His .516 OPS against the Reds is the second lowest against any team for Roberts (behind STL – .333).
I changed my mind. Anyone who can only go 2/15 against someone we’re going to play 15 times a year!
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else following the Winter League box scores
developing a serious Alongso?
Then 'twas the Roman, now 'tis I.
by Man Mountain on Oct 28, 2008 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Link?
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doug had the stats up yesterday
http://redsminorleagues.com/2008/10/27/winter-league-stats-update-and-more/
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Many thanks
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
11 BB/ 14 K
Is that a good ratio, and is that something he’s known for?
Yes, I know I’m being lazy. Sorry.
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's pretty good
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about frazier
he’s ripping it up, too. 77 AB is almost meaningful.
Slyde, from that other thread wherever it was: I agree with you that we need ~150 runs total. I was looking for 40-50 in a single big bat.
by bbjones on Oct 28, 2008 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is Furcal that certain to stay in LA?
I dont know what his Defense is like, but I figure a Furcal-Phillips combo would be sick right? And it would keep BP at 2b, where he doesn’t seem to particularly want to move from. And he’s an FA so we wouldn’t have to give up prospects.
His career OBP is only .020 below Roberts, and I think the added D may be about even (plus, then prospects can go to get Beltre).
Defense and pitching in ‘09, y’all.
...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield
by Cy Schourek on Oct 28, 2008 1:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Furcal is good, but not as good as Roberts
RAR FRAR TtlVal 2006 42.7 -5.1 43.3 2007 8.3 4.1 17.4 2008 20.6 2.0 23.8
plus he’s only played 174 games over the last two seasons, so I’d be a little worried about that. I wouldn’t hate signing Furcal, but I’d MUCH rather have Roberts, even at the cost of the prospects.
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
The last we heard, he loved LA and LA loved him, and both wanted a return.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 1:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oops again
That was a reply about Furcal.
Often wrong, never uncertain.
by sidnancy on Oct 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i kinda like this idea
and i would be willing to give them Bailey+Francisco+mid-level dude to do it, hinging on our ability to sign Roberts to a LTC. i like the idea of trading Francisco this winter. he strikes me as the kind of guy who could be overrated by some people. he has monster power but no strikezone judgment. im very weary of his bust potential. it may be wise to sell high on his prospect status.
"If you don't get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what's gonna happen to you? You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company."
by Charlie Scrabbles on Oct 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed about Francisco
I don’t know if him, Bailey and a B prospect will do it just because Homer’s stock has fallen so drastically. I’d like to hold on to Homer and let him regain some value.
by ken on Oct 28, 2008 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Roberts
Bubba Crosby’s former roommate.
I vote yes, if only to get him out of the AL East. ;-)
But he’s reportedly the owner’s favorite. It’s probably going to take a lot to pry him away.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named Bubba?
by BubbaFan on Oct 28, 2008 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would like to see Eckstein in Cincy
He has a big heart, he’s a winner, and he’s fairly consistent. I am a big fan of his, and he would provide some veteran leadership much needed by this young team.
http://naptownsfinest.com
by Colts Homer on Oct 28, 2008 7:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
how do they fit such a big heart into such a little, tiny body?
"You never want to give up a 7-0 lead, in your rival's ballpark, that would put them in first place. Never want to do that." - Ron Darling
by Slyde on Oct 28, 2008 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's quite tragic really
he has an oversized heart and his days are numbered as he was expected to live past age 12.
"It will put a smile on your face to see a Chevy with a Soviet transmission"
by justin007000 on Oct 28, 2008 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm glad he lived up to expectations...
Think of me what you will...I gotta little space to fill
by chandrathan on Oct 28, 2008 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so you're telling me
that David Eckstein is Jack?
...because there's already someone posing as Jacob Brumfield
by Cy Schourek on Oct 28, 2008 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colts Homer is a WITCH!!!!
BURN HIM NOW!!!
"Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est."
by jch24 on Oct 28, 2008 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's tough to burn cliche witches
unless you’re burning them at both ends. In which case, you have to take them one day at a time, staying within yourself, not trying to do too much, but remembering to be patient and wait for a good witch to hit.
Some folks say that all the public wants to see is dunking of cliche witches, but — and maybe I’m just old school in this — I say that you don’t need that kind of flash when a good solid finger roll will do the trick. So before we go blindly taking them to the rack, we should consider a few crisp chest passes to loosen up the defense and get everyone involved.
Hey, it’s just my opinion, but I’d like to see us get back to playing good, solid, fundamentally sound physical Red Reporter witch burning; ya know, just line up our guys against their guys, come off the blocks, and smack each other in the mouth. Use the run to set up the pass and control the clock.
In the end, the result probably comes down to special teams’ play.
Then 'twas the Roman, now 'tis I.
by Man Mountain on Oct 28, 2008 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
No
The Reds aren’t going to win the World Series next year even if he is the starting 2nd baseman.
I think Roberts would cost too much in the way of prospects. Also, I don’t think locking up a 30 year old to a 5 year contract is such a good idea.
If the Reds only needed 1-2 more players to win it all, I’d make the trade in a heart beat.
by Snake the Jake on Oct 28, 2008 10:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You ask -Would I (we) not want Roberts because you think the Reds are set in the middle infield or because you don't particularly want Roberts?
I would like him very much, thank you. But I don’t think Walt will go there. My guess is that Walt will keep Phillips at 2nd and either give Gonzo a chance or push for Hairston at SS. I think Walt is more interested in getting a right handed power hitter for LF a la Holliday. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Votto working out at 3b as Yonder gets closer. Or Yonder at 3b in the minors.
Sgt. McCAin and Sarah The Impaler don't scare me none.
by Madville on Oct 29, 2008 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
why not younder in left field?
"It will put a smile on your face to see a Chevy with a Soviet transmission"
by justin007000 on Oct 29, 2008 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yonder is a 1st baseman
would you try to put Sean Casey at 3B or LF? the guy is a decent/average 1B, but he’s not going to play anywhere else.
"If you don't get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what's gonna happen to you? You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company."
by Charlie Scrabbles on Oct 30, 2008 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















