Community Projection: Jay Bruce
I think we had some fun with these community projections last year, so I figured we would do them again for 2008.
Kicking things off will be Jay Bruce, timely since he had a profile piece written on him by John Fay yesterday:
Jay Bruce was in Cincinnati to accept Baseball America's minor-league player of the year award.He wore his Sunday best - tailored suit, white shirt, tie. Adam Dunn jumped on the chance to apply the needle.
"Why didn't you just wear your normal stuff?" Dunn asked. "Why you gotta try to impress everyone?"
"I'm getting the minor-league player of the year award," Bruce replied.
"When I got my award, I just wore my usual stuff," Dunn said.
"Was it for the Reds organization or all of baseball?" Bruce said.
Touché.
Bruce is pretty much a can't miss now to be a solid regular, the real question is just how good he'll be. The ceiling for the guy is higher than anyone the Reds have had come along since Adam Dunn.
Which as an aside, and I hate doing this because I think the steroid what if game is pretty dumb, but isn't Adam Dunn a little more valuable and impressive now? Unless you think there's even a 1% chance of him having used something (I guess anything is possible).
But anyway, I think Jay Bruce is going to put up some pretty impressive numbers in the next few years. He hit a ton of doubles last year, and it's not crazy to think some of those might leave the year once he finishes filling out. 40+ home runs a year doesn't seem impossible, and I'm sure playing in Great American will benefit him. But that is eventually. In 2008 he might struggle, and it's hard to tell how much playing time he'll get.
I'm going to project him at .270/.320/.510, with 19 home runs, 45 RBI, and 4 stolen bases, and make that in about 105 games. I could see him surprising me with the average, but with the strikeout numbers he put up in the minors I could see him struggling to make contact a little bit. I also could see the Reds starting him off at AAA and then limiting him against lefthanders once he is up with the team.
Leave your projection for the same stats as above (AVG/OBP/SLG / HR / RBI / SB / Games) (and add commentary saying why you feel that way) and we'll get them accumulated and tallied up.
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First!
by chandrathan on Jan 7, 2008 1:21 PM EST reply actions
Now Jay Bruce will put up no stats...
And you all know why.
by chandrathan on Jan 7, 2008 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
Bruce
So, long story short, I'm guessing a .260/.315/.465 line with 15 HR, 39 RBI, and 2 SB in 115 games. I think he'll start the season with the team, struggle the first month and be sent to Louisville to get his confidence back. He'll come back in June and be a mix of good and bad at the plate for the rest of the season.
Jay Bruce agrees about the Ks,
Also, I don't see Ryan Braun putting up Ryan Braun type numbers this year.
by ken on Jan 7, 2008 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
quotes from Jay on his blog......
"I do what I can for my homies."
"I REALLY need to be more patient, and quit striking out so d@%n much haha."
"The day I stop having fun I'm quitting."
by jacob brumfield on Jan 8, 2008 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Some entertaining shit at Yardbarker
Be well and give something from the heart and eat up . And if u dont have a idea of what to get, get a tigers hat hahahahha.
your boy
d-nice
I think Zach is a professional baseball player.
by ken on Jan 8, 2008 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
Bruce
0.290 0.345 - 0.510 ---- 22 - 70 - 6 - 125
Why? why not?
I think he moved from High A to AAA with little drop off in his production. I attribute that to good bat speed and good pitch recognition.
Yes, he will have a lot of strikeouts in the ML, if he gets to play 125 games. But he will also produce.
By 2010, I see him being a left-handed Matt Holliday type player (ala 2007).
Bring it on!! Or play Norris Hopper; you're choice Wayne.
by Lonesome George on Jan 7, 2008 1:46 PM EST reply actions
I'm an optimist
by gocolts on Jan 7, 2008 1:57 PM EST reply actions
I'm thinking
He hasn't slowed down through three levels of the minors. These numbers are a few ticks below what he was able to produce last year in the minors. I think he'll be really good. Really soon.
.200 12HRs 12RBI 51 1/2 Ks 133BB
Seriously?
Skimmmed right over that
I thought the interent was..
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jan 8, 2008 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
Could have been
by Paul Householder on Jan 8, 2008 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
.270/.330/.480, 7 HR, 30 RBI, 4 SB, 75 G
Don't forget Alex Gordon
.247/.314/.411 15HR, 60RBI
For anyone who cares, that's the same line Alex Gordon, the 2006 Minor League Player of the year and supposed can't miss 2007 ROY candidate finished the last season with. And Gordon was several years older than Bruce last season.
.284/.350/.574 30HR 90RBI 10SB 113 games
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jan 7, 2008 7:11 PM EST reply actions
Zach already has take a Dunnesk liking to Bruce
I'll balance out Zach
.358 / .414 / .631 / 36 / 123 / 15 / 146
Though maybe I should shave a few games and RBIs off that. I'm guessing the Reds do with Bruce what they did with Bailey last year. Start in him Louisville, then call him up in June. For clock reasons.
i think it's safe to say that zach's
There could be...
Global warming and stuff, ya know.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Hmmmm
I think Jay starts out hot until teams make adjustments on him and he slumps at mid season and starts platooning for a while. Then a late season injury to Jr gets him back to playing full time and he finishes on fire to crack the .300 BA plateau.
by Ron41 on Jan 7, 2008 8:06 PM EST reply actions
i suck at projections
.268/.351/.560/17 HR/ 60 RBI/ 108 Games
moving through the minors
by davemaher on Jan 8, 2008 1:09 AM EST reply actions
I'm not too concerned
Anyway, my point is that Bruce will need to make adjustments at the Major League level, but that may be where it needs to happen. He's likely just one of those guys that is so much better than the others in the minors that the only place he'll be truly challenged and forced to adjust is in the Majors.
I think that's why some of us expect him to struggle some next year. The hole in his game appears to be plate discipline right now, and until he starts facing pitchers who can more precisely hit their spots, he may not have to make any adjustments to get better.
thanks
by davemaher on Jan 9, 2008 1:28 AM EST up reply actions
I'm honored that you are honored
amnesia
by davemaher on Jan 9, 2008 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
My early take on it
.275/.340/.515. Lots of strikeouts. Lots of extra base hits.
I'm stealing George's numbers..
avg - Obp - slugging % - HR - RBI - SB - games
0.288 0.345 - 0.510 ---- 28 - 76 - 6 - 125
I do think he will have his share of strikeouts.. I hope him and Dunn can work together to get those numbers down.. Is Jacoby still the hitting coach? If they can put Jr., Bruce and Dunn 3-4-5 in the lineup it is going to be feast or famine..
no copying off your neighbor
I am freakin' flattered
Criminy, I hope you don't have a social disease or anything.
by Lonesome George on Jan 8, 2008 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
I changed my answer.
If you are anything like the people in my office
Bottom rung..
Hey now, I take offense
I wasn't talking about you
And yes, you did help me out with my internet connection, so I guess I'm forever indebted to you. If you ever need help with ETL work to load healthcare data into a decision support system, lemme know.
.289/.365/.504/18 HR/97 RBI/9 SB/147 G/
by jacob brumfield on Jan 8, 2008 12:58 PM EST reply actions
the rumor is he's a goldstar man
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jan 8, 2008 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
Jim Callis on our boy Volquez
Is it fair to assume that Edinson Volquez (if he still qualified as a prospect) wouldn't have been ranked among the Reds' Big Four prospects (Jay Bruce, Homer Bailey, Joey Votto, Johnny Cueto) but ahead of Drew Stubbs? Would Volquez be a viable candidate for the Top 100 Prospects list?Erick Metzger
Columbus, OhioVolquez has exceeded 50 major league innings, so he's no longer a prospect in our book. He definitely wouldn't have ranked ahead of Bruce, Bailey, Votto or Cueto, arguably the best foursome of prospects in any farm system right now. He probably would have settled in at No. 5, ahead of Stubbs, though I'm not the biggest Volquez fan in the world. I wouldn't have advocated him making the Top 100.
Volquez throws hard and has a nice changeup, but he never has shown a reliable curveball in the big leagues and his control and command always have been spotty. I see him more as a classic tease, a guy who can light up radar guns but never will be the frontline starter his velocity suggests he might become.
Trading Josh Hamilton to get Volquez made sense for the Reds, however. They had the second-worst ERA in the National League last year and more outfielders than they knew what to do with. Now Cincinnati has an opening for Bruce to play in the majors and another candidate for its rotation.
Considering that the Rangers have been on a perpetual search for pitching, however, shouldn't it tell us something that they were willing to part with Volquez?
RE:
Could be that the Rangers see the extraordinary upside of Hobbs IF he stays healthy etc. And that maybe a change of scenery will do some good for Volquez.If he can throw strikes (if)and keep the team in the game for 5or 6 innings, he'll be worth the trade.
who wants to project the NH primary?
Edwards-28%
Clinton-24%
Richardson-7%
Kuchinich-1%
Other-.9%
Gravel.1%
I wish I had set up an elaborate pool before Iowa
i had both norman mailer and kurt vonnegut
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jan 8, 2008 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
It's early yet
yep
by justin0070000 on Jan 8, 2008 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
...he'll get Biden to push her around...
by jacob brumfield on Jan 8, 2008 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno, man.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jan 8, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno, man.

by Fat Vegas Alan on Jan 8, 2008 10:56 PM EST up reply actions
The pollsters were so wrong on this
I'm glad. Maybe now the rest of us will get to vote.
ohio is on march 4
by justin0070000 on Jan 9, 2008 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
new prediction
by justin0070000 on Jan 9, 2008 12:42 AM EST up reply actions
Obama Girl, is it you?
I'm insulted
by ObamaGirl on Jan 9, 2008 7:35 AM EST up reply actions
Didn't help Guiliani
by ken on Jan 9, 2008 2:40 AM EST up reply actions
re
kos speculates that the main reason for Hillary's upset -- which was really quite enormous considering the polls -- might have been backlash over the backlash over her crying incident. that makes sense to me, considering barack beat hillary among women in iowa then lost among women by double-digits in NH. hillary does consistently face a double standard when it comes to character, and most people don't even realize they're treating her differently. if she's stern, she's being a bitch. if she giggles, she's being a little girl. if she shows emotion, she's calculating and manipulative. she can't win when it comes to being human, and it's very possible that the crying incident pushed new hampshire women over the edge.
Takes me back
Marge: "That's a pretty lousy lesson."
Bill Clinton: "Hey, I'm a pretty lousy president."
I could see that
Howard Fineman at MSNBC thinks many women sympathized with Hillary for her anger as much as her vulnerability:
...While her angry outburst in the ABC News debate made some men think of shrewish ex-wives, it seemed justified to many women, who thought she had reason to be peeved.In a workplace context, Obama may have reminded women of underqualified hotshots who come along and get the big job with less experience because they're cooler and have more rapport with the boss and are, after all, men.
The fact that Howard Fineman
i think the fact that you used the phrase
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jan 9, 2008 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
if peeing your pants is cool
Been meaning..
Oh yeah! DirecTV coming in next week. I'll get my Reds in HD games on FSN now. Who's coming?
Bruce
I like that statement. Throw the kid in center and lets go.
avg - Obp - slugging % - HR - RBI - SB - games
0.275 0.333 - 0.520 ---- 25 - 80 - 10 - 120

by 















