What Ryan's Departure Tells Us About Krivsky
While Terry Ryan did a spectacular job in his own right as Twins' GM, the article about his departure on ESPN noted the difficulty he has had in signing veterans to long-term contracts since Krivsky departed (Santana, Hunter, Morneau, etc.). I know Krivsky handled this department, and ably, it seems. Just look at the contracts for Dunn, Harang and Arroyo. I think this is one aspect of his job performance that doesn't get a lot of attention. I am really pleased with this aspect of his job performance, and moreover I think it's an important part of the job.
And I think Dunn gets paid. Another extension. He'll hit #500 in a Cincinnati uniform.
Do you think Phillips gets an extension this winter? How many years and how much money?
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
Phillips
by Slyde on Sep 13, 2007 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I bet
How many Twins did Krivsky ink to LTD's during his tenure in Minnisota?
Free agents who left under Krivsky's watch....
Shannon Stewart
Jacque Jones
A. J. Pierznyski
Kenny Rogers
David Ortiz
Javier Valentin
...and those who stayed?
Torii Hunter
Johan Santana
Seems like at best a mixed bag.
by James Quinn on Sep 13, 2007 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ortiz....
Tough call.
And I think that the diary is a fair description of Wayne's contribution, that he doen't get enough credit for.
by Lonesome George on Sep 13, 2007 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's too bad for the Twins....
The lesson with Bonds / Big Papi is this: be nice to the media. If you are nice to them, they will cover for you and pretend it's all "natural". If you are a jerkoff, they will hound you. PR is everything.
by ucclark on Sep 13, 2007 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Papi
by ken on Sep 13, 2007 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"big papi"
by Charlie Scrabbles on Sep 13, 2007 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How's about
I'll start: George "GODDAMNMUTHAFORKINBLANDSUNSHINEENEMA" Grande....Chris "'STACHEBEHIDINTHESTRETCHMARKS" Welch
by Pops Daniels on Sep 14, 2007 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh, its good. but not great.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Sep 14, 2007 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to nitpick
And while he kinda screwed up with Ortiz, they did replace Papi with Morneau, which has worked out.
by jch24 on Sep 13, 2007 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That trade brought to
by Thundering Turtle on Sep 13, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i think phillips will get somewhere
by Charlie Scrabbles on Sep 13, 2007 2:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd guess that it'd be much less
by ken on Sep 13, 2007 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jose Reyes might be a good comparison point.
by Geki on Sep 13, 2007 3:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reyes
4-year EXTENSION thru 2010 worth $23.25M- + he receives a $1.5M signing bonus and salaries of $2.5M in 2007, $4M in 2008, $5.75M in 2009 and $9M in 2010- + the deal includes a Team Option for 2011 worth $11M or a $500K buyout- + he receives a hotel suite on the road (if the hotel has such accomadations)- + bonuses he has earned: $50K for 2007 All-Star
I could see BP getting something along those lines, but maybe a little bit less because of the market and because BP is lower profile than Reyes. I adjust my prediction to 4 years, $22 million.
by Slyde on Sep 13, 2007 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For some reason...
I think it may be that he sort of defies classification with respect to his offense, and it is a bit difficult to figure out exactly what his role is in the lineup.
Although he has good speed, he doesn't take a walk or get on base like a guy you want to bat first or second in the order in front of the RBI guys. He also does hit into an awful lot of double plays because he is such a free swinger. Jose Reyes, because he really causes complete havoc on the basepaths and because he has learned to take a walk, is much easier to classify.
Although he has decent power, he doesn't strike me as a guy the opposing manager (other than LaRussa, who did it to EdE to get to Votto!??!) will intentionally walk in a crucial late-game high-leverage situation. Reds examples include Dunn, Griffey (at times), Greg Vaughn, Eric Davis, Dave Parker and the like.
That makes his offense good for a middle infielder, but not the guy you can build an offense around. I get the sense (perhaps because he is such a free swinger and strikes out a fair bit), that he's just a pitcher's adjustment or two away from being a not so good hitter.
He plays good defense, although I've read on RR that most metrics say he's pretty average. Is that still true?
All the measurables point to giving the guy a deal that is less than that for Reyes (who is two years younger), but not by much.
Not sure why I don't feel good about it though. It could be that he's not a great baseball guy.
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blasphemy!
by Daedalus on Sep 14, 2007 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if...
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...
by Daedalus on Sep 14, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet Ash...
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm 100% sold on BP!
Lets recap BP 30-30, .270-.280 hitter, Gold Glove Defense...what is there not to be sold on.
Also what does it take to be a baseball guy?
by Zach K on Sep 14, 2007 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The fact that you are supporting him blindly
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How am I supporting him blindly?
by Zach K on Sep 14, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're not analyzing the stats
First, looking at batting average to judge the value of a player without considering OBP or SLG is a huge flaw in your methodology.
Second, I think what makes me uncomfortable with giving the guy a huge contract is perhaps the conventional wisdom that players who do not have plate discipline tend not to succeed long-term. I am no statistician, so I wonder whether that bit of conventional wisdom is true or not.
However, if you look at the best offensive players, most do not have 30 walks to 90 strikeouts over the course of a 500-600 AB season. To wit:
- A-Rod: 84-103
- Pujols: 90-56
- Bonds: 131-54
- Chipper Jones: 70-70
- Magglio Ordonez: 71-76
- Prince Fielder: 72-105
- Chase Utley: 47-76 (a good comp for BP)
- Hanley Ramirez: 47-88 (also a good comp)
- Miguel Cabrera: 69-115
- Vlad Guerrero: 65-59
- Ryan Howard: 89-180
- David Wright: 88-109
- Dunn: 94-156
- Griffey: 85-88
If you look at BP's Runs Created/27, he is at 5.54, good for 85th in MLB and 11th among second basemen. Jose Reyes is at 6.23, and Chase Utley (tops among 2B) has a 9.11.
What I am saying is that merely saying "30-30 with a .280 average and a gold glove" is not enough for me.
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow this is where I hate Stats
by Zach K on Sep 14, 2007 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying much
This statement says more about the Reds infielders since Reese than it says about Phillips. Unless you think D'Angelo Jiminez, Filipe Lopez, and 40 year old Barry Larkin were good defenders.
Lets recap BP 30-30, .270-.280 hitter, Gold Glove Defense...what is there not to be sold on.
How about the fact that even with all of those homers, his SLG is still under .500? Or the fact that even hitting for that average with all of those homers his OPS+ is still only 105? Or the fact that he's shown a couple of brief flashes of the assholishness that got him shipped out of Cleveland in the first place?
by sidnancy on Sep 14, 2007 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
by Paul Householder on Sep 14, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those are some good points
by Zach K on Sep 14, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha ofcourse
by Zach K on Sep 15, 2007 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Phillips the Hitter
I think he's a good and aggressive hitter, a bit straeky, but so long as his batting average hovers near .280, I don't care. I also don't mind his low OBP is his power numbers remain high--averaging 20 homers p[er year, let's say. That makes him a legitimate right-handed RBI man in the middle of your lineup. Remember, they started Enacarnacion at cleanup this year, and he couldn't hack it. Would love to see BP's HRs and RBIs since moving into that slot.
So, I do see him as a run producer. I still think they envision Encarnacion as the eventual cleanup guy. Where does that put BP?
by jamesp50014 on Sep 14, 2007 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea
by Zach K on Sep 14, 2007 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BP
I'm not going to pretend that I perfectly understand the new-fangled fielding metrics, but from what I've seen he's performed at a high level this year - a step up from 2006. JinAZ has broken down the fielding stats by month and had some nice things to say about BP. Whether you're looking at in-zone or out-of-zone plays (per THT), BP rates well. Which jibes with what I've seen.
by ken on Sep 14, 2007 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Phillips & Kriv
I think mentioning the AJ thing was one of the most lopsided trades of my lifetime is a valid point. Was no DFA. Ryan made some mistakes, but his tenure was incredibly successful. the AJ trade was a a reason why.
I like investing in Phillips as a core guy. He's shown me enough. I think Dunn has accomplished the same. Biggest season of his career (and not a contract year). A legit top guy in the NL. Worth another contract. This eases Bruce into Griffey's slot, or creates competition between him and Hamilton--which would be an epic battle, and fun to watch.
by jamesp50014 on Sep 13, 2007 4:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So does Wayne being here
If so, then hell yeah, that's a gold star!
by Officer Dibble on Sep 14, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
gold star
by Charlie Scrabbles on Sep 14, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















