Reason #453 to Keep Dunn
The White Sox announced a new two-year deal for OF Jermaine Dye, 2 years, $22 million. So that makes a deal of $11 per year. Adam Dunn's option for 2008 is $13mil.
At age 33, Dye will be at 35 when that deal is done and Dunn will be age 28.
Well, surely Dye is being paid for his superior defense. Not really. If Dunn is a bad fielder at .833 RZR, then how bad can Dye be at .801?
Dye is more than likely getting paid for his prowess at the plate.
Dye's Numbers
.242 BA
.306 OBP
.791 OPS
Dunn's Numbers
.262 BA
.370 OBP
.922 OPS
Another argument for Adam Dunn, and another hole in those arguing against picking up his option.
0 recs |
26
comments
Read Related
Comments
to play devil's advocate
one could say that Williams is an idiot and overpaying for Dye (he is on both counts). And therefore that particular signing is not a true reflection of the market.
I, of course, think Dunn is worth the option and possibly an extension. So I welcome this signing as more grist for the "Keep At'em" mill.
by Man Mountain on Aug 19, 2007 8:28 PM EDT 0 recs
The market is what it is
by Brendanukkah on
Aug 19, 2007 9:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Dye
by dougdirt on Aug 19, 2007 9:24 PM EDT 0 recs
AS the wheels keep turning Dunn
by Madville on Aug 20, 2007 12:21 AM EDT 0 recs
with the numbers he'll put up
by OURob on
Aug 20, 2007 1:24 AM EDT
up
0 recs
$12.5 million
by rojosoto on Aug 20, 2007 9:06 AM EDT 0 recs
Krivsky will prove
by Paul Householder on Aug 20, 2007 10:28 AM EDT 0 recs
I wonder
by Gray on Aug 20, 2007 11:31 AM EDT 0 recs
Estimate
- he receives a $3M signing bonus payable in 2007 and salaries of $11M in 2007, $12M in 2008 and $18.5M each year in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012
- the deal includes a full NO-TRADE clause in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and a limited NO-TRADE clause in 2011 and 2012
- prior to to 2011, Lee and the Astros must mutually agree on 12 teams to which he cannot be traded without his consent
- the deal includes a nominal weight clause that requires him to maintain a certain body weight
Player From To Ages AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SF GDP SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS+
Carlos Lee 2003 2006 27-30 2456 390 712 150 2 131 442 206 18 329 15 35 60 61 15 .290 .344 .513 119
Adam Dunn 2004 2007 24-27 2099 390 528 113 4 160 378 407 42 695 27 9 33 25 5 .252 .378 .538 132
Neither is a good defender, but most metrics put Lee above Dunn. Given that Dunn is 3 years younger, I think it's fair to say that his value is at least at the level of Lee. Lee's contract is back-loaded partly because the Astros are paying $12M this season for Biggio/Bagwell. Maybe Dunn's would do the same to account for Griffey, but suffice to say it will take a large sum of money to lock Dunn up on the open market.
by Slyde on
Aug 20, 2007 11:52 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Sounds about right...
by Gray on
Aug 20, 2007 11:59 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I think
by Slyde on
Aug 20, 2007 12:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I want 5 year, $75 million
by Daedalus on
Aug 20, 2007 12:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
That would be a deal.
:-(
by Gray on
Aug 20, 2007 2:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Run producers
by ken on
Aug 20, 2007 1:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I understand
by Slyde on
Aug 20, 2007 1:58 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Note to self: time to refinance
by ken on
Aug 20, 2007 3:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
As much as Dunn dislikes 1B
by matchu522 on Aug 20, 2007 3:19 PM EDT 0 recs
Dunn NEEDS to go to 1st.
by Madville on
Aug 20, 2007 10:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Reason 453 not to keep Dunn
by Zach K on Aug 20, 2007 5:48 PM EDT 0 recs
Zach, I don't always like you either,
by Madville on
Aug 20, 2007 10:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
and dunn does a mean CCR karaoke
by Charlie Scrabbles on
Aug 20, 2007 11:19 PM EDT
up
0 recs
This is more information than I need to know.
by Madville on
Aug 21, 2007 12:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
For some reason,
by andromache on
Aug 21, 2007 9:21 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yowza
by Brendanukkah on
Aug 21, 2007 1:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I was joking dude
by Zach K on
Aug 21, 2007 1:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You speak with straight tongue
by Madville on Aug 21, 2007 5:45 PM EDT 0 recs











