Reason #453 to Keep Dunn
The White Sox announced a new two-year deal for OF Jermaine Dye, 2 years, $22 million. So that makes a deal of $11 per year. Adam Dunn's option for 2008 is $13mil.
At age 33, Dye will be at 35 when that deal is done and Dunn will be age 28.
Well, surely Dye is being paid for his superior defense. Not really. If Dunn is a bad fielder at .833 RZR, then how bad can Dye be at .801?
Dye is more than likely getting paid for his prowess at the plate.
Dye's Numbers
.242 BA
.306 OBP
.791 OPS
Dunn's Numbers
.262 BA
.370 OBP
.922 OPS
Another argument for Adam Dunn, and another hole in those arguing against picking up his option.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
to play devil's advocate
one could say that Williams is an idiot and overpaying for Dye (he is on both counts). And therefore that particular signing is not a true reflection of the market.
I, of course, think Dunn is worth the option and possibly an extension. So I welcome this signing as more grist for the "Keep At'em" mill.
The market is what it is
by Brendanukkah on Aug 19, 2007 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Dye
AS the wheels keep turning Dunn
with the numbers he'll put up
$12.5 million
Krivsky will prove
by Paul Householder on Aug 20, 2007 10:28 AM EDT reply actions
I wonder
Estimate
- he receives a $3M signing bonus payable in 2007 and salaries of $11M in 2007, $12M in 2008 and $18.5M each year in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012
- the deal includes a full NO-TRADE clause in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and a limited NO-TRADE clause in 2011 and 2012
- prior to to 2011, Lee and the Astros must mutually agree on 12 teams to which he cannot be traded without his consent
- the deal includes a nominal weight clause that requires him to maintain a certain body weight
Player From To Ages AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SF GDP SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS+
Carlos Lee 2003 2006 27-30 2456 390 712 150 2 131 442 206 18 329 15 35 60 61 15 .290 .344 .513 119
Adam Dunn 2004 2007 24-27 2099 390 528 113 4 160 378 407 42 695 27 9 33 25 5 .252 .378 .538 132
Neither is a good defender, but most metrics put Lee above Dunn. Given that Dunn is 3 years younger, I think it's fair to say that his value is at least at the level of Lee. Lee's contract is back-loaded partly because the Astros are paying $12M this season for Biggio/Bagwell. Maybe Dunn's would do the same to account for Griffey, but suffice to say it will take a large sum of money to lock Dunn up on the open market.
Sounds about right...
I think
I want 5 year, $75 million
Run producers
I understand
Note to self: time to refinance
As much as Dunn dislikes 1B
Dunn NEEDS to go to 1st.
Reason 453 not to keep Dunn
Zach, I don't always like you either,
and dunn does a mean CCR karaoke
by Charlie Scrabbles on Aug 20, 2007 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions
This is more information than I need to know.
Yowza
by Brendanukkah on Aug 21, 2007 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















