JohErardi's RISP Column... Uninformed flat out Gibberish
news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070729/SPT04/707290354
I'll summarize the column by quoting Erardi's conclusion "Turns out, it (RISP) means almost nothing." and citing the two primary points which lead him to his conclusion:
-"For a career, most batters hit within a few points of their overall average with RISP." and
-"The NL overall batting average is .261; with RISP, it's .260."
How's that for third grade thinking?
And Based on Erardi's other columns, "The case for Keeping Adam Dunn" and "Trade Arroyo, Keep Dunn" it's not hard to figure out where he's coming from with all this mess and what he hopes to accomplish.
I won't fact check Erardi, I'll assume his two facts are correct - that "most" batters do hit near their overall avg. with RISP and that the league overall and RISP averages are usually fairly close. HOWEVER, in the context of the CINCINNATI REDS and ADAM DUNN those facts MEAN NOTHING.
Adam Dunn is NOT "most" batters. ADAM DUNN IS and has been the cleanup or 3/5 hole hitter on this team for years. His batting avg. with RISP is consistently ~30 points BELOW an already RELATIVELY LOW batting average. The whole construct of major league batting orders is to get top of the order hitters on base and in scoring position so 3/4/5/6/7 hole hitters can drive those runners in. To the CINCINNATI REDS it makes no difference what league averages or "most" hitters do. What matters to the CINCINNATI REDS is what Cincinnati Reds hitters do and when the Reds arguably most important rbi guy in the lineup with RISP is CONSISTENTLY ~30 points below an already low Batting Average this is a problem ! These are opportunities LOST............stranded Runners... defense, pitching and TIMELY hitting are the age old components of WINNING Baseball. A big part of "timely" hitting is hitting with RISP.
What makes up an "average" John Erardi? Well, typically a certain number of "entities/trials" which are on or near the average, another group which are above, and another group which lie BELOW......... when one of the Cincinnati Reds key RBI guys year after year is BELOW average this is a problem. 7 years of RISP struggles !!! Your line of thinking Erardi is wait 7 more years for the Law of Averages to kick in for Adam?? ... ?.....not going to happen...........
More likely John Erardi, not being able to hit with RISP is an attribute of Adam Dunn. It is an attribute which has its roots in his bad hitting fundamentals, feast/famine approach and inability to situationally/technically adjust as a hitter. These are qualities of Adam Dunn which show no signs of changing. These are some of the things that make Adam NOT "most" batters..............and NOT in a good way.........more likely Adam Dunn will continue to struggle with RISP for the next 7 years and some other hitter in baseball on the Cardinals, Red Sox or Yankees will continue to hit with RISP above his already fairly good batting average. This is how "averages" work John. Problem is the Reds are on the wrong end of all this courtesy of Adam Dunn (for one).
I don't know who you are John Erardi but I do know your steps for reaching a conclusion are suspect and that you don't know baseball.
0 recs |
89 comments
Comments
Do you think Adam Dunn will be traded?
by Zach K on Jul 29, 2007 10:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re:
At this point... I fear best case scenario is Reds don't pick up his option for 2008 and let him walk. Worst case....they renegotiate or pick up his option.
by MichaelRed on Jul 29, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure about that
by Zach K on Jul 29, 2007 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re:
by MichaelRed on Jul 29, 2007 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Griffey hasn't been to great with RISP
by Zach K on Jul 29, 2007 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
What techinal/situational ADJUSTMENTS does Dunn need to MAKE at the plate?..........I assume you've broken DOWN TAPE and can tell us more preciseLY.
by Man Mountain on Jul 29, 2007 10:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re:
Your better hitters can hit a variety of pitches to all fields and/or at least hit a variety of pitches well.........Adam does neither.
Adam clearly has a good eye but how many hitters hit more "foul balls" than Adam? Not too many.... Think that might have something to do with his long looping swing? (rather than the preferred short/compact one)
And all the strikeouts...... think that might have something to do with the long looping swing and lack of plate coverage?
by MichaelRed on Jul 29, 2007 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow,
by Thundering Turtle on Jul 29, 2007 10:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re:
I'm not going to blindly question his integrity so I guess I'll opt for that he just doesn't know baseball.
by MichaelRed on Jul 29, 2007 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
giving in to personal bias
totally agree.
by Blue on Jul 29, 2007 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Might I say...
Although, I fear if he gets traded, this site will turn into a Nascar fan the day after Dale Earnhardt died...
by chandrathan on Jul 29, 2007 10:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I sorta agree
by Zach K on Jul 29, 2007 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to tell you this
Heehee, HoHo, Haha...
by Man Mountain on Jul 29, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad you enjoy them...haha
by Zach K on Jul 29, 2007 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of the great lessons I've learned...
by Red Menace on Jul 30, 2007 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And then you sort of just stick in their head
Reeeddd Men-ace
by Slyde on Jul 30, 2007 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if only
by Red Menace on Jul 30, 2007 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dibs.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 31, 2007 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to say...
Then I thought of your name as Fat Vegas Adam, and I can't stop laughing about it!
by chandrathan on Jul 31, 2007 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Co-Stanza...
by chandrathan on Jul 30, 2007 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ooh
by Man Mountain on Jul 29, 2007 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As long as you don't wear shoes...
by chandrathan on Jul 29, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the departure of Dunn....
by tonywf on Jul 30, 2007 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good God
by JD Arney on Jul 29, 2007 11:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope you aren't banning him...
by chandrathan on Jul 29, 2007 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
shrine?

Seriously though, it's not like we believe Dunn is infallible. Most of us are just arguing for some perspective on his faults. Besides there are plenty of places on the web and talk radio where people bash Dunn. I don't think there is a problem with one or two places on the web thinking he's someone hold on to.
by Slyde on Jul 29, 2007 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not infallible?
by Man Mountain on Jul 29, 2007 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude shouldn't have gotten banned.
by chandrathan on Jul 29, 2007 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Was he banned again?
For what that's worth.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 29, 2007 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously that's JD's call
I'm not a particularly big fan of Brandon Phillips. What if every other day I started a diary claiming that his attitude is killing the team; that the fact that he's 2 for his last 17 shows that he's an incompetent hitter; that his 17 double plays are not very savvy? And when anyone argued against me, I'd totally ignore their facts and tell them they've been blinded by Phillips's glowing smile and home run power. I think I'd get pretty annoying very quickly.
I also think that I'd be bad for a site that is built around discussion and debate. These types of diaries aren't about discussion. They are about shouting matches. It's like talk radio on the web.
I've had some interesting arguments with Michael that I really enjoyed, but frankly I can't remember one that has happened in the last two seasons. When he first came to the site in 2005, he was a little obnoxious, but he was also open to debating topics. We had some good discussions and I even think we came to some agreements (I agreed that Dunn has holes in his swing, and he agreed that OBP and SLG are better stats for evaluating a hitter). But he's not here for that type of discussion anymore. I believe he's just here to get people yelling back and forth at each other. I think this would be why JD banned him.
by Slyde on Jul 30, 2007 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't like what he has to say...
If you know he is just here to stir up fights, then why do you feed into it? I assure you, it'd upset him a lot more if you just ignored him, or posted pictures of cats, than it does you guys arguing right back at him.
I just don't think it's cool to have banned him. And I don't think it's cool that people get attacked on here so viciously if they happen to mention "Hey, Adam Dunn just struck out." Look at what has happened to Zach. Every one of his posts now involve him somehow saying he doesn't want Adam Dunn traded.
by chandrathan on Jul 30, 2007 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I'm just not a very big person.
by Slyde on Jul 30, 2007 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holla
by Pops Daniels on Jul 30, 2007 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come strong.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I got
by Pops Daniels on Jul 30, 2007 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love the internet..
I think it's great that technology has allowed for the creation of something like this. I can imagine that there have always been many many long depressing nights for many little people.
(I guess Red Reporter does much the same thing for Reds fans.)
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
by Pops Daniels on Jul 30, 2007 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why, Pops! Whatever do you mean?
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Show me where this has happened?
I think people get attacked when they make arguments that aren't based on any kind of reasonable fact. Which, quite frankly, I'm ok with.
Go look at mlb.com's message boards to see why. This site could get pretty ugly pretty fast if we just had two or three Michael type posters, and that's why I moderate the way I do.
I'd like to think I'm a really reasonable person (I gave NEILYNG, a certifiably insane human being, numerous chances) so if you have any problems with decisions made here feel free to email me and let me know why. There's a pretty good chance I'll change my mind if you make a good argument.
by JD Arney on Jul 30, 2007 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
As one of the folks who did disagree with Zach, I can say honestly it was more for his statements regarding Narron than what he said about Adam Dunn. I did think at the time that some of his statements were either inconsistent or were not fact-checked, so I disagreed with him on that basis.
Of course, I tend to fact-check the people who disagree with me more often than the people who agree with me, which is why I probably went after Zach, since I am a person who does not think we should trade Adam Dunn for two relief pitchers and who did not like Jerry Narron.
by Paul Householder on Jul 30, 2007 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry for that comment Paul
by Zach K on Jul 30, 2007 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a problem.
by Paul Householder on Jul 30, 2007 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And from my end...
by Paul Householder on Jul 30, 2007 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
by Zach K on Jul 30, 2007 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the problem with ignoring
by Red Menace on Jul 30, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if you BAN him
by boobs on Jul 29, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
too many elipses....
Anyone know who has led the Reds in RBI for the last 3 seasons? Who leads the Reds in 2-out RBI this year? Who leads the Reds in RBI in the 7th inning or later with the team trailing? Anyone knows these answers? Anyone?
by Slyde on Jul 29, 2007 11:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
jeff keppinger
by boobs on Jul 29, 2007 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey boobs?
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 29, 2007 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey alan!
by boobs on Jul 29, 2007 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've got a question..
I was working on a nice diary with stats and links and pictures and corny alliteration and everything and well, it's gone. I don't know how it happened but my laptop just decided to close my RR tab.
So I can't find it on my end but if I had "previewed" it twice or thrice is it possible for you or Slyde or JD to locate it on "your end?"
No? Didn't think so.

by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 29, 2007 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah im of no help there
by boobs on Jul 29, 2007 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I've done that before..
But. I. Wasn't.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you use Firefox
Or if Firefox crashed altogether, it should ask you if you want to restore when you start it again, and your diary might be there.
No help if you don't use Firefox, but it's one more reason to switch. ;-)
by BubbaFan on Jul 29, 2007 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That also works if you use Maxthon...
by chandrathan on Jul 30, 2007 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Maxthon..
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nah

by boobs on Jul 30, 2007 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Max has no arms, legs or torso.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
face tryst
by boobs on Jul 30, 2007 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I thought.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not me.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but how's the New Coke?
by Red Menace on Jul 30, 2007 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Firefox..
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's my style of writing too...
by crolfer on Jul 30, 2007 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PS
The ad hominem way you approach Erardi and the fact that you felt the need to write a long diary about it to stir the pot makes me think that the article does not, in fact, strike you as gibberish. It actually scares you a bit. It's a reasoned argument about a player's value to a major league club, backed up by statistics. And it appears in a major news organ for the city of Cincinnati where a lot of people who have never read or heard this sort of argument before will see it and might reconsider their opinions. I think you read it with the irksome feeling that you might be wrong about Dunn's worth to this team.
You are.
by Man Mountain on Jul 29, 2007 11:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was
by Pops Daniels on Jul 30, 2007 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michael, do you really think...
Might you try to relax and take a look and the many facets of sabermetrics that are discussed in the Enquirer and here at Red Reporter and maybe pick one part that kinda maybe makes a little bit of sense and then maybe ask a few questions and discuss genially?
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 29, 2007 11:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ASDJFLASKJDFLKJASD
Hey look I can make as much sense as Michael.
by Geki on Jul 30, 2007 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
After a quick check...
However, his OBP is quite a bit higher with RISP. I assume this can be attributed to intentional walks?
by chandrathan on Jul 30, 2007 12:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Intentional
by JD Arney on Jul 30, 2007 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except (perhaps)..
So, correct me if I'm wrong, that might account for his drop-off in production in such situations.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 30, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget that Dunn often bats
by Madville on Jul 30, 2007 6:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Texas reference, Al
by Madville on Jul 30, 2007 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks pardner, but now that I think of it..
Maybe only cattle lick salt licks.
And also, I probably shouldn't have used Wade Miller when trying to give an example of a better than average pitcher but A] he pitched for Dunn's hometown Texas team for years and B] he owns Adam Dunn. (Miller is now a Cub if you go looking for him on that link.)
by Fat Vegas Alan on Jul 31, 2007 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most animals like salt licks
by Man Mountain on Jul 31, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also like little ponies
Even the wrathful ones.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcCCSpK2Amw
by Brendanukkah on Jul 31, 2007 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ehhh...
Kind of yes - all of his IBBs are with RISP, as you'd expect.
But he's also drawing more non-IBBs. Overall, he non-intentionall walks 17.4% of PAs (once IBBs are taken out); with RISP, it jumps to 19%; and with 2 outs and RISP, 20.8%.
Further, as I posted in the other Michael thread, You'd also see he puts the ball in play more often (which no one talks about): 74.2% vs. 72.6%. That's right - despite what Michael thinks, Dunn does appear to change his approach with runners on, and it seems to hurt him (and the team).
What I think is happening, is (1) he's not getting as many pitches to hit, (2) but he's trying to hit more of those pitches that are now worse to swing at, so (3) his BA (and SLG) is dropping. It might be better advice to tell him "Just approach these situations like any other - wait on your pitch and drive it."
by sidnancy on Jul 30, 2007 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn != Gwynn
- can I place my vote for sidnancy as hitting coach! please! Are there any real hitting coaches out there that teach this kind of philosophy? If so, how can we get one hired on in cincinnati? I think asking Dunn to be Tony Gwynn is a bad idea, because that takes a certain kind of skill that dunn clearly doesnt have, so just letting him keep one approach at the plate constantly sounds great to me. Even other than statistically, I (and I'm sure some of you) can see the difference in his approach this year, and I don't like it at all. Weakly flying out to LF with a runner on second is no better than a whiff.
by TheDude on Jul 30, 2007 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jul 30, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will you introduce me to Dunn?
I mean, you know him and all...
by Daedalus on Jul 31, 2007 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
im a fairly new member of the RR congregation
"keppinger could be the best hitter on this team"
fuck the heck.
by Charlie Scrabbles on Jul 30, 2007 1:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You mean?
by Pops Daniels on Jul 30, 2007 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great!
by Brendanukkah on Jul 30, 2007 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahahahaha!!!
by Paul Householder on Jul 30, 2007 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he means
by Caleb on Jul 30, 2007 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn as "RBI guy"
Also, I want to say something regarding your 30 points of batting average RISP differential. Suppose he gets 200 at bats in the RISP category for a season, how many hits less does he get than another hitter who doesn't lose those 30 points? 6! 6 hits! You are making a huge stink over 6 hits??? 30 points of batting average is not a big deal when compared to the quality of those hits, keep in mind some hits wont even score a runner from second!
"How's that for third grade thinking?" - Oh , the irony!
by TheDude on Jul 30, 2007 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















