C. Trent vs. Marc Lancaster

I haven't been reading a lot of the Cincinnati Post's Reds blog since Marc Lancaster has left. I mean it's still in my feedreader, but I've kind of tended to skim over it so far this spring training, because it's changed quite a bit.
I really enjoy reading all of the other Reds blogs (I have all the ones I know about in my Bloglines account), but Lancaster's site was the most useful to me for quite a while. That's not a knock on any other Reds blogger, it's just simple acknowledgement that Lancaster had better access to breaking news than any of us by virtue of his job with the Post. I can't count (and probably wouldn't want to know) how many Red Reporter posts in the last year started off with "From Marc:".
That being said, I realize I have a somewhat unique take on all of this, and that the Post might be better served with a more conversational, community oriented blog. C. Trent seems to be heading in that direction, but man from here it's looking like a trainwreck so far.
The guy's doing an awesome job in certain respects. He's linking out to other bloggers, something Marc never really did. He responds to comments pretty frequently. He posts frequently.
However, I'm amazed that comments like this one are allowed to stay up. The platform Cincinnati.com uses for it's blogs absolutely allows its authors to moderate comments, so it's squarely on C. Trent that garbage like the above is still live.
You'll generally find a slower breed at "official" message boards and websites, because the effort level is less to post there. Redszone is always going to be a more intelligent place to discuss the Reds than the official board at Reds.com, because you're showing a certain level of competence to even find Redszone in the first place. The same goes for blogs like Red Reporter, Red Hot Mama, Church of Baseball and so forth versus a blog owned by the Cincinnati Post.
I'm willing to cut C. Trent some slack because of the above, but not too much.
I'm a big believer that once you get to a certain level the readers carry a site. Red Reporter is a perfect example of that. C. Trent probably oughta think about the environment that he's promoting by letting idiots like the aboved linked commenter continue to post. However, it's possible that he just doesn't care because he's going to be out of a job in the next year, but he should, because like I said above, there are a lot of things he's doing right, better than Marc even. I'm sure there are a ton of papers in this country that'd jump to hire a sports reporter with a successful background involving new media. The whole allowing idiotic comments and obsessing over girls in the stands probably oughta stop though, before it burns him.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree
I hadn't realize the Post was folding. But that's even more reason to be concerned. He should think of that blog as his resume.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named "Bubba"?
Funny looking guy
by rose2hall on Mar 8, 2007 8:28 AM EST reply actions
This is exactly
I'm glad JD (God?) took the time to address this. Eventually, new media sites carve out a culture for themselves and the moderators can do quite a bit to shape the sort the dialogue that occurs there, not merely by removing comments/banning posters but more importantly by setting an example for the type of self-policing one can expect.
I've been reading this site for 2 years; I decided to take the plunge into commenting precisely because I appreciated and enjoyed the level of dialogue that JD and the other Red Reporters promoted.
LLM
I appreciate that C. Trent updates us on breaking news such as lineups, trades, signing, etc... but the rest of the jiberish I could do without. I never bother to read the comments. They just go to show how well this site is run.
by indy on Mar 8, 2007 10:14 AM EST reply actions
Bah
It's a blog. It's not supposed to be Chaucer.
Regarding "jibberish" in the comments: What are the inside jokes here about? "First" and whatever people were talking about during the last game threads of last year? I'm fine with it, but let's be honest, this isn't the most serious or topical site in the world at times.
Take it for what it is: a general forum for Reds fans. This is more of a niche site. Go there for your Big Mac, come here for your Filet.
Or...
Quite possibly the most disgusting sandwich that I've ever seen!
by chandrathan on Mar 8, 2007 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Hmm...
by chandrathan on Mar 8, 2007 12:02 PM EST up reply actions
mmmm
by rose2hall on Mar 8, 2007 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
yeah
seriously, that cc stuff got hella creepy.
Trent
As far as the blog comments go, this is the only blog that I visit regularly where there is a large amount of people who contribute commentary worth reading. I only read the Post's blog to get Reds info, the comments suck, they usually sucked w/ Marc, now they just suck more or suck harder, whichever.
by JCH888 on Mar 8, 2007 4:30 PM EST up reply actions
exactly
And it's a sports blog. It's not a blog on wine-tasting or small business accounting. It's the kind of thing that you can expect kids to be reading.
I toned down my blog when I realized that there were children reading it. Not that I think a few off-color jokes will scar a child for life, but parents often get irate at that kind of thing. And that goes double for a blog attached to a newspaper.
All Things Bubba: Because how can you not love a baseball player named "Bubba"?
Related?
ivil War General
by TR on Mar 8, 2007 12:48 PM EST reply actions
wow
Hey JD
by Paul Householder on Mar 8, 2007 6:30 PM EST reply actions
Accompanying art
by Doc Scott on Mar 8, 2007 9:35 PM EST reply actions
C. Trent's blog
He seems to have taken down the surreptitiously-snapped photo of CC. Perhaps he saw this thread or his boss saw it or something.
by Doc Scott on Mar 8, 2007 9:39 PM EST reply actions
No More talk of CC
I imagine
C. Trent
In today's blog, he mentions getting in late last night from donating at the "Dale Mabry Performing Arts Center."
That would be Mons Venus, of course, on the Dale Mabry highway in Tampa.
Perhaps that's something he shouldn't be discussing in a "family newspaper blog."
Just Kidding
This sure isn't the first time that I've thought some writing was obvious humor when other readers took it at face value. Until they figure out a way to work tone of voice into blog comments, that's going to continue to be a problem.
I don't think that deleting comments is the answer, though, any more than refusing to talk to kids about sex is the answer to teen pregnancy. I'd rather see discussion about an offensive comment. Especially since, most of the time, the author probably didn't mean it the way it was taken.
by Red Hot Mama @ Red Reporter on Mar 11, 2007 7:30 PM EDT reply actions
Oh no
And I could probably count on one hand the number of comments I've deleted on this site, but I mean the possibility is always there. The owner of a site can't just have an anything goes policy, or things will almost always degenerate pretty quickly.
This is the second time that the comments have really gotten out of hand over there. I seem to remember some racist comments when Marc was still there, and he clamped down.

by 

























