What does Carlos Zambrano think?
This story kinda has it all:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2763803
He refers to himself in the third person twice (calling himself "Carlos Zambrano" and "Big Z") and makes the infamous claim that dooms most in the minds of fans ("This is a business.")
Personally, I appreciate his candor. And what he's saying is true: He's worth a hell of a lot of money. Looks like whoever said dollars are all that matter (in reference to why Bronson would want to stay in Cincy) had a good point.
"Jim [Hendry] spent a lot of money. I hope he has more for 'Big Z.'"
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Mostly, he doesn't think...
by matchu522 on Feb 13, 2007 2:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Smart move by the big fella
As long as teams continue to act in their financial best interests without criticism, you will never hear me criticize a player acting in his financial best interest. Especially a pitcher who was managed by Dusty Baker for 5 years. Get it while the gettin's good.
by BLee2525 on Feb 13, 2007 2:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cub fan's perspective
I've advocated trading Z for quite some time now, and this posturing in the media clearly hasn't changed my point of view. Yes, he's a great pitcher, but his control issues tell me that he may never reach the next level (don't get me wrong, he definitely could). But I don't think pitchers should EVER get contracts longer than 5 years (with the possible exception of Santana). There is simply too much possibility for major injury when pitching is concerned, which would potentially make Z's contract a bigger albatross than it already was.
Some put stock into PAPs (depending on what mood Bill James is in), and if they do hold any legitimacy, Dusty Baker has made Zambrano a perpetual league leader in pitcher abuse. What IS indisputable is that Zambrano already has some back problems, and back problems at 25 only get worse. I would not at all be shocked to see him suffer from debilitating back pain by the age of 30-32 if this problem continues.
At any rate, Hendry has handcuffed our club by spending like Paris Hilton on a coke binge, with massive contracts to players that register as only pretty good, but not oustanding (Soriano), mediocre (Lilly) and just plain bad (Marquis) who all makes this situation even more complex. Had the Cubs gone into rebuilding mode like teams that almost lose 100 games with no farm system SHOULD, we wouldn't have this problem, and could easily trade Z to the Yankees for prospects (starting with Hughes--although there is considerable argument whether they would even part with him for a rental player...I think they would). But instead, we've been positioned to compete this year (and in our weak division, we probably will), which has essentially put us in a "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position where we need to re-sign Zambrano or this season is a complete waste, and we don't really have the money to sign him now without mortgaging the future. I still think we should cut our losses and trade him immediately (or even at the deadline), and the fact that he has a big ego only strengthens my conviction. His clear priority to bleed the Cubs for all of the gold in fort knox is sad since we're the organization that gave him his chance, and brought him up, but I don't hold it against him (you can't fault a player for trying to gain leverage), but his ego (and referring to himself in the third person) seems even more ridiculous when one realizes that he isn't even the best pitcher in the Nl Central (Carpenter, then Oswalt) let alone the entire NL.
If I may conclude this rambling post, I think we'd just be better of trading him now, as signing Zambrano to a seven year contract worth 130 million or more just isn't appealing.
by Thelonious on Feb 13, 2007 3:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
great points...
by crolfer on Feb 13, 2007 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sticking point
But my bigger point is that I wonder if this whole Cubs' offseason is some kind of karmic slapdown. Here's an organization that was notoriously cheap for years and years. Not Marlins-cheap, but for a behemoth like the Tribune Co., cheap. The Co. realized that fans would come to Wrigley and the TV money would come in no matter what kind of product they put on the field, so why spend? Makes sense from the point of view of a corporation concerned about the bottom line, but doesn't make much sense from the point of view of winning baseball games. Or valuing your fans. Now the team finally is in a position where they're ready to break open the vault, and the best that can be had are the likes of Lilly and Marquis. And signing those guys might preclude signing Zambrano, the only true #1 starter in the bunch.
I'm not superstitious, but maybe this team really is cursed.
by ctnyc on Feb 14, 2007 12:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Zambrano
by indy on Feb 14, 2007 8:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















