Winter Meetings Day Two
Just a quick recap on Reds mentions to get us started (and please don't start a diary for every rumor, that's what this thread is for. But if a deal actually gets done then knock yourself out on diary creation.):
- The Reds have asked about Dontrelle Willis:
The Reds have asked the Marlins about Dontrelle Willis. But a deal between those two teams is unlikely. The Marlins are still placing a high price tag on Willis, so they no doubt would ask the Reds for their best young pitcher, Homer Bailey, plus one more player. And the Reds have little interest in moving Bailey. One baseball man who spoke to the Reds described their interest as "tire kicking."
I can't imagine the Reds getting Willis for anything that would be near his actual worth (which isn't much in my opinion), so I'd certainly rather they go in other directions.
- They are also listening on Josh Hamilton and Edwin Encarnacion. Hamilton for Sean Marshall really wouldn't make me all that happy either.
- Brett Tomko is interested in rejoining the Reds. Could work as a fifth starter / reliever.
- The Tim Lincecum rumors might be untrue:
Word had circulated around the hotel that the Reds spoke with the Giants about starting pitcher Tim Lincecum, with the names of top Cincinnati prospect Jay Bruce and third baseman Edwin Encarnacion floated as part the potential deal. Before the end of the day, it had proven to be untrue.
Bruce is considered the best prospect in baseball, and the outfielder was Baseball America's Minor League Player of the Year this past season. Conventional wisdom is he'd be off the table for any deal. When asked if he had any players he deemed "untouchable," Cincinnati GM Wayne Krivsky declined to name names.
I hope Bruce is untouchable, or close to it. It is hard for me to come up with a realistic deal that would actually make me feel ok with Bruce leaving.
90 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bedard still a possibility?
How many teams are after Erik Bedard? The tally yesterday included the Phillies, Cardinals, Yankees, Mets, Mariners, Angels, Dodgers, and D'Backs - that's eight. The Baltimore Sun's Jeff Zrebiec and Dan Connolly check in with the latest on the Orioles' ace.
There's been a ton of trade interest in Bedard (as you might expect). Andy MacPhail is still talking about signing him to an extension, but no one really buys it. The package he'll get in trade should rival what the Twins get for Johan.
The Dodgers, Mariners, and Mets have been pursuing Bedard the most aggressively. More meetings with the Mets should occur today. The Mariners could make an intriguing offer built around Adam Jones and Brandon Morrow.
A new team is added to bring the tally to nine: the Reds are interested. However, Jay Bruce is off the table.
by Thundering Turtle on Dec 4, 2007 10:05 AM EST reply actions
Bedard
Although he is not as accomplished as Santana, Bedard has less mileage (barely half the number of big league innings), is the same age (eight days older than Santana), is cheaper and is signed through 2009, a year longer than Santana.
He is certainly better than either Haren or Blanton, but I'm not sure the Reds match up well with the Orioles on this. They've got a glut of overpaid OF and an expensive and rapidly aging left side of the IF. They wouldn't have a spot for EdE unless they could move Mora, which is a big "if." That said, I can't see another team topping an offer of Bailey, Votto and one lesser prospect (Stubbs?).
Bailey is potentially great, but Bedard's already there.
by TravisG on Dec 4, 2007 10:12 AM EST reply actions
Do you give up this much?
One baseball source called the Mariners a "dark horse" in the Bedard sweepstakes if they would be willing to put together an offer that included outfield prospect Adam Jones and pitcher Brandon Morrow.
At this point, the Orioles are looking for an offer - similar if not better - to what the Twins are requesting for Santana. That is basically two top-quality, ready-to-play young major leaguers and a third prospect.
I would trade any player on this team for him
Hopefully...
by Paul Householder on Dec 4, 2007 10:55 AM EST reply actions
Lose your dreams...

by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Fay
Paging Mr. Tomko...
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Can't we trade Griffey for Tomko?
by Brendanukkah on Dec 4, 2007 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
obviously
by Man Mountain on Dec 4, 2007 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
No
Hmm...
5th starter
Tomko's a joke
For the record...
Somehow, it feels inevitable.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
Skip Carray was also prone to saying
by justin0070000 on Dec 4, 2007 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
The one thing I don't get...
You have Jeff Keppinger, who can play third but probably is not going to hit .340 next year.
You have Farney, who really stunk last year, even when he wasn't loopy from the concussion.
You have Castro, who should not be on a 40-man roster.
What are they thinking? Move Cantu over there? As far as I could tell, he wasn't a very good fielder with TB, which is why he is at first.
I can understand trading Hamilton, because essentially, Jay Bruce and Hamilton are somewhat comparable, although Bruce probably hits for higher average, and Hamilton hits for more power. (Not that I am in favor of trading Hamilton. I personally think he will probably overcome the injury bug and put up .290-30-100 in 2008.)
by Paul Householder on Dec 4, 2007 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
My guess
I don't mind Keppinger...
I think he's proven to be a good complementary player who should be given a shot at starting, but he hasn't proven that he is an every-day starter yet such that the Reds should trade away a starting position player to make room for him. Furthermore, the guy is 27 going on 28, which means he is at or near his peak.
EdE is only 24 and at that young age already has two respectable major-league seasons under his belt, and they are willing to give up on him?
If I were Krivsky, I would not trade EdE unless I could get someone like Lincecum in return (without giving up a major additional piece, like Hamilton, Votto, Cueto, Bailey or Bruce also).
Then again, if I were Krivsky, I would be wearing an ugly sweater.
by Paul Householder on Dec 4, 2007 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
I'm wondering
by pw on Dec 4, 2007 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
There's a difference...
I think Homer Bailey is going to be a very, very good pitcher, but I already know that Bedard is an ace, and we'd have him at an affordable rate for two seasons minimum.
by TravisG on Dec 4, 2007 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
Hold on
Maybe not...
If I were Dusty Baker and I had both those guys, I'd give Harang the ball on Opening Day to show respect for his past service to the team, but Bedard would start Tuesday. It'd probably be better that way, so the lefty could slide in between Harang and Arroyo.
But that's a pretty nice decision to have to make, isn't it?
by TravisG on Dec 4, 2007 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
Reds in the hunt for Lincecum?
One Reds official think the Giants almost have to trade Tim Lincecum to build an offensive core. It seems the Mariners and Reds in particular are pushing for Lincecum. The Ms could offer Adam Jones; the Reds have Jay Bruce, Joey Votto, and Josh Hamilton. The Mariners could've had Lincecum with the fifth overall pick in 2006, but opted for Brandon Morrow instead. The Reds could've had him too but went for Drew Stubbs.
by Thundering Turtle on Dec 4, 2007 12:59 PM EST reply actions
Fro the Chicago Sun Times:
''I've always been able to work deals with Jim [Hendry], and I don't see any difference this time if we go that direction,'' Padres GM Kevin Towers told San Diego reporters Monday.
* * The Reds appear willing to trade five-tool but injury-prone outfielder Josh Hamilton, a good Cubs fit if healthy.
by Thundering Turtle on Dec 4, 2007 1:15 PM EST reply actions
I would feel comfortable
prior is sombody you trade a low level prospect fo
by justin0070000 on Dec 4, 2007 5:02 PM EST up reply actions
fortunatly ctrent is montering the
Would you trade Bruce for Lincecum straight up?
- Starting rotation - Harang/Arroyo/Lincecum/Bailey/Cueto for the next 4 years will be the strongest rotation in the NL
- Don't lose Pop - With Dunn/Hamilton/Phillips/Encarnacio/Votto/Griff next year, and a Dunn extension if this trade is made (I assume).
- Don't lose pitching - We don't have to give up pitching (our weakness).
- Bruce's Potential - he ripped up AAA at 20 yrs. old!
- Injuries with Hamilton and Lincecum (who is small and has the potential to be injury prone). Plus, if Hamilton & Griff are down at the same time, their replacements are Freel/Hopper - major downgrades!
- Inexperience with 3 rookie/2nd year pitchers in the rotation next year
another positive
- we keep payroll flexibility. Maybe we could get another reliever with that flexibility.
I guess that settles it, 4 to 3.
by JJ on Dec 4, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
too bad griffey won't go west
by justin0070000 on Dec 4, 2007 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
No
I'd trade Hamilton or Edwin for him though.
From ESPN...
The San Francisco Chronicle reported that according to two officials with knowledge of former Sen. George Mitchell's probe of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball, the report will be released in the two weeks before Christmas, rather than during the winter meetings.
That means that teams could make deals during the winter meetings, only to learn two weeks later that the free agent they just signed faced possible discipline by Major League Baseball for past use of banned substances.
It is anticipated that the report will name names of current and former major league players who have used performance-enhancing substances including anabolic steroids and human growth hormone.
The entire article.
Oh, and it seems that the Royals just absolutely positively had to get a Jose Guillen deal wrapped up. They couldn't wait for any silly reports or anything like that.
Prediction:
Tim Lincecum: a big maybe. It depends how desparate the Giants are.
Trade parts: Votto, Hopper, Guevara (he's still here, isn't he, as of this moment?), Maloney, Keppinger OR Encarnacion, Shearn (don't laugh), Dickerson, Freel.
I don't like the idea of trading Hamilton; yes, he may be injury prone, but I think we have just scratched the surface of what this guy can do. And Jay Bruce, never.
Homer OR Cueto (not both) if the value was right.
And please DON'T sign Tomko. He's a stiff.
by Lonesome George on Dec 4, 2007 5:25 PM EST reply actions
So basically
Na ga ha pen.
by TravisG on Dec 4, 2007 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
Bret. Tom. Ko.
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 5:45 PM EST up reply actions
Which reminds me...
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 5:48 PM EST up reply actions
He was outrighted to the minors
So...
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 6:01 PM EST up reply actions
Pieces , parts
Alone, most of the Reds' parts aren't worth much at this point (except Homer, or Cueto) but packaged together, they might be enough to get that coveted #2 or #3 starter.
Let's face it, Bailey OR Cueto (or both) gets their shot this year (2008). I mean a real shot; +20 starts, 150 innings, etc.
If Bailey (or Johnny C.) bombs, gets injured or looks sub-average, his value actually goes DOWN (a prospect turns into a suspect). Nobody is a lead-pipe cinch to make it. IF 2008 is the year, Homer OR Cueto, together with a couple of the other parts, may be an attactive package for somebody good as the 1,2 or 3 starter. Outside of Harang, we got a lotta mediocrity.
I'm just listing parts, not proposing a deal. I'd really like Bedard, but I think he is out of reach for the Reds.
by Lonesome George on Dec 4, 2007 7:43 PM EST up reply actions
Shearn cleared waivers
by TravisG on Dec 4, 2007 5:58 PM EST reply actions
I could handle him as a long reliever
by justin0070000 on Dec 4, 2007 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
Christ on a cracker
Holy Shit
Discuss.
The hot stove just got real HOT
by ken on Dec 4, 2007 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
You've got that mixed up
by Paul Householder on Dec 4, 2007 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
I went to H.S. with Maybin...
Check out...
(Don't skip the intro.)
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 8:18 PM EST up reply actions
Damn shame
Anybody know any campy/bad-ass songs from the '80s about fish?
It's all kinda hazy..
by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 4, 2007 8:37 PM EST up reply actions
Go '70s
Good gravy
Hahahahaha
A scant 48 hours before that game, another seemingly innocent event occurred ... its impact on the Tigers even now yet to be fully understood. On April 4, 1987, in Arden, NC, Cameron Maybin was born.Some 19 years and one World Series appearance later, Detroit is closely guarding its 2005 top draft pick (10th overall), having refused to include Cameron in any of last season's mid-year trade proposals, including one that would have given superstar Alfonso Soriano to the offensively challenged Tigers.
That's heady stuff, even for someone who was named by Baseball America as the nation's 2004 Youth Player of the Year and who made everyone's 1st team High School All-American list in 2005.
That is AWESOME!
by Officer Dibble on Dec 4, 2007 9:15 PM EST up reply actions
from minorleagueball
By John Sickels
Posted on Tue Dec 04, 2007 at 04:40:00 PM CDT
Working on the Reds farm system today.
Good Lord.
This system is loaded. You have the top quartet of Bruce/Cueto/Votto/Bailey, but even beyond them there is a good combination of performance guys and projection guys. My initial run through came up with 49 names worth writing about. I have narrowed that down to 39, which is the most I can put into the book. Even that, some of the guys I cut I wish I could put in.
Take heart, Reds fans. You have a lot to look forward to.
It seems like yesterday
How cool
ESPN radio is reporting
by Thundering Turtle on Dec 4, 2007 8:12 PM EST reply actions
The Cubs?
by Lonesome George on Dec 4, 2007 8:23 PM EST up reply actions
Dan O'Brien
by fletch @ Red Reporter on Dec 4, 2007 8:30 PM EST reply actions
Bedrad
Be-darrrrrrrrd.
Be-darrrrrrrrd.
We should make that happen like yesterday if we can.
And Cabrera and Willis to the Tiggers just ain't right.
Or Bedard, if I culd spel gud.
by Officer Dibble on Dec 4, 2007 9:17 PM EST up reply actions
its benard
A Christmas Memory
After his freshman year she came back to school having gained about 20 lbs. He still liked her but we used to sing "Be-dard, stop getting fa-at" to the tune of Firehouse's "Baby, Don't Treat Me Bad."
It was petty, but it makes me giggle everytime I see the name.
She eventually lost the weight and married a lawyer.
by Man Mountain on Dec 5, 2007 12:45 AM EST up reply actions
Um...
I think you meant to post this at On the DL. ;-)
From Newsday:
by Thundering Turtle on Dec 5, 2007 10:13 AM EST reply actions
Maybe in addition to playing baseball
Or maybe the Reds are just trying to bring back that winning spirit from 1995. What's Mark Portugal up to?
by Brendanukkah on Dec 5, 2007 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
The question is...

by Fat Vegas Alan on Dec 5, 2007 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
He can still take the ball every 5th day
by Man Mountain on Dec 5, 2007 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
for everybody who says
by justin0070000 on Dec 5, 2007 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
He's a putz
No Thanks....
This is why I've always been a believer that the best trades are the ones you don't make. They're overrated, as long as you have some semblance of talent and the ability to develop it in a meaningful way. I'm glad we didn't make the trade. We'd be paying top dollar, giving up 2-3 pitchers/top prospects, and paying for a potentially great but at times under performing pitcher.
So I take it you're a "no"
by Brendanukkah on Dec 10, 2007 11:53 AM EST up reply actions

by 



















