Rich Aurilia Signs With The Giants
Now what's John Fay going to write about?
2 years, $8 million. Pretty good pickup for the Giants, I'm sure Aurilia will be worth $4 million a year, especially in this market.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mixed News
by HokieRed on Dec 2, 2006 3:17 PM EST reply actions
I disagree
We take a big hit in our "Veteran Presence," though. Need to sign somebody to replace that.
I hope you're right
by Dayton Reds Fan on Dec 2, 2006 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
Already signed Gonzalez and Moeller.
by Paul Householder on Dec 2, 2006 6:34 PM EST up reply actions
Next year
Regular spot?
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/baseball/mlb/san_francisco_giants/16147304.htm
by cggarb on Dec 2, 2006 4:06 PM EST reply actions
Glad He's Gone
by NYRed on Dec 2, 2006 6:26 PM EST reply actions
draft picks
(Stubbs over Lincecum might equate to Gruler over Kazmir)
by fletch @ Red Reporter on Dec 2, 2006 7:38 PM EST reply actions
Stubbs/Lincecum
Stubbs had 3 huge plusses and 2 huge question marks coming in. He has all kinds of power, all kinds of speed, and is a fantastic defender. All three of those were confirmed in his first professional action. The 2 questions marks were plate discipline and contact rate. He has answered one of those already, with a .110 isoD at Billings. He still struck out a ton, but he has time to improve that.
If he doesn't iron out the contact problems, he's Mike Cameron. .250AVG, 20HR, 20SB, gold glove defense. If he does, the sky's the limit.
This draft was weak by all accounts, so taking a guy with a safe floor and a high ceiling isn't a bad idea. I would have liked Lincecum, but I'm not holding that against Stubbs.
draft picks
Gotta admit though...
See you later, Bad Man, and thanks for a nice couple of seasons.
by Paul Householder on Dec 2, 2006 11:11 PM EST reply actions
Will this suffice?
by Brendanukkah on Dec 3, 2006 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
I was trying to be positive...
Bad Reliever (Franklin)
Bad Reliever (White)
Bad Reliever (Cormier)
Bad Reliever (McJeffsky)
Bad Reliever (Hammond)
Bad Starter (Michakalaka)
Bad Starter (Mays)
Bad Starter (Sunny D)
Bad Starter (Williams)
Bad Outfielder (McCrappen)
Bad Outfielder (McWisen)
Bad Shortstop (McClayton)
Bad Second Baseman (Womack)
Bad Outfielder (Hollandsworthless)
The problem is all of these were the "bad" bad and not the "good" bad.
by Paul Householder on Dec 3, 2006 1:04 AM EST up reply actions
C'mon man, glaring omission...
by Ash on Dec 3, 2006 6:22 PM EST up reply actions
Ha! Didn't even think about it that way.
by Ash on Dec 3, 2006 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
Oh. Sorry.
Krivsky I don't yet know about, but he started well and has been getting worse and worse.
If he signs Aaron Boone, I will know for sure that he is an idiot. You know Narron will start him over Encarnacion and put him in for "defensive purposes" because he has such a great "veteran presence" and is a great "baseball guy" from a whole family of great "baseball guys."
by Paul Householder on Dec 3, 2006 7:10 PM EST up reply actions
why is krivsky
Crazy week ahead?
Dude, keep it up.
by Ash on Dec 4, 2006 4:28 PM EST up reply actions
Trade Dunn
Dunn to the Orioles for Nick Markakis and A. Loewen or anothe pitching prospect. Or to have mor fun a 3 way deal including the Angels
Dunn to the orioles, Tejada to the Angels and Ervin Santana, Erick Aybar or Wood, kendrick to the reds.
Tell me your opinion and what would be the deal breaker.
Remember 1990
by Dominican Red on Dec 4, 2006 6:20 PM EST reply actions
heck yeah
Markakis a stud, Loewen is a top of the rotation starter.
Santana is a solid #3 and Kendrick can and will absolutely rake. Then I take Wood instead of Aybar.
But no way either team does this.

by 



















