John Fay Has A Pretty Sweet Job
I'm getting really tired of John Fay. I don't like going after beat writers like some sites do, but I can't help it after reading this story. The headline "Reds not ruling out Aurilia" doesn't jibe with the story (which basically comes to the conclusion that it's not at all likely that Aurilia is coming back), but I'll give Fay the benefit of the doubt since he might not have input on headlines for his stories.
What bothers me is the choice of subject matter. The Cincinnati Enquirer is certainly the paper of record for the Cincinnati Reds, I don't think there can really be any debate with that. Why is the paper of record talking about Rich Aurilia at this point?
It's obvious that the Enquirer is only going to run a story a day (if that) about the Reds at this point in the year, and that's fine. It is, after all, nearly December. But why waste the space on something that's a foregone conclusion? The Reds have a first baseman. They have a second baseman. They just signed a shortstop. And they have a third baseman.
Where would Rich Aurilia play if he were to resign? How could anyone be wondering at this point if Aurilia is coming back when every position the man plays has a starter, and most of them also have backups?
This is one of our 4-5 stories a week on the Reds? John Fay spent yesterday calling Barry Axelrod to find out about Rich Aurilia? Is there really nothing better to do? I'd rather see a profile on Chad Moeller than something this pointless.
Add this to Fay's constant insistence that the Reds have no money, and I'm pretty much finished with the guy. This is why newspapers are dying.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Odd
Newspapers lost their competitive advantage with the growth of cable television, and later the internet. It used to be an incredible luxury to have the day's news delivered to one's driveway, especially the sports results from across most of the country. Not so much anymore, considering anyone can GAMECAST live online free of charge....or join a game thread for interactive feedback.
by ohiobobcat on Nov 29, 2006 8:27 AM EST reply actions
Joining a gamethread
by Brendanukkah on Nov 29, 2006 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
Line of the offseason
Now, I simply look at myself as a drinking fan with a baseball problem, instead of the other way around.
by ohiobobcat on Nov 29, 2006 9:58 AM EST up reply actions
Question
Yeah, I have a feeling a couple of my friends think I'm nuts. I'm waiting for a RedReporter intervention.
I lost a lot of friends this season
I guess it was a good way to separate friends from acquaintances.
Ha...
I spent the whole summer watching baseball while talking to you guys on here. She was very nice, and would even help me comment...
I can't wait until the season starts again!
by chandrathan on Nov 29, 2006 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
Less is more, in this case
by ohiobobcat on Nov 29, 2006 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Writers don't get their headlines
by dfs on Nov 29, 2006 10:06 AM EST reply actions
"This is why newspapers are dying."
newspapers
By the way another huge nail in the coffin of newspapers was craigslist. The newspaper classified is their most profitable section. Now I couldn't imagine buying or selling something from the classifieds.
that's bizarre
It's probably some sort of brain tumor on my part. I'll leave it at this.
you might have a worm/virus
that's what I figured
I
I was able to before, after
Frightening thought...
In Defense Of
by Pinetarfly on Nov 29, 2006 1:08 PM EST reply actions
i would have chosen
That is the most noteworthy part of the trade, really, him being the longest tenured Red and all. And that's not boring.
Reds Coverage
This is how I assume Reds beat writers come up w/ a story.
- Make an assumption (i.e. the Reds payroll will be $70M) don't bother making a lot of effort to find this out, preferably make no effort. Sure you could call Castellini or one of his friends or whoever and make an attempt to get some information but why get the story all clogged up w/ facts?
- Make an assumption (i.e. the Reds have no interest in signing Jason Schmidt) rely on the first assumption to back up this assumption. DO NOT under any circumstances phone Schmidt or his agent to find this out.
- End your story w/ something like "despite everything I just wrote, it could be all wrong, Castellini might want to spend a ton of money and sign a huge name. You never know."
- Submit the story and be very proud of a job well done.
by JCH888 on Nov 29, 2006 2:26 PM EST reply actions
143
GREATER CINCINNATI (OH) --- One hundred forty three players have filed for free agency. Simple math would estimate each team would sign roughly five free agents this offseason. The Reds have to be considered very proactive in this current economic environment, as they have signed OF Bubba Crosby, SS Alex Gonzalez, and C Chad Moeller. Wayne Krivsky is known to burn the midnight oil, and is working the phones prior to the General Manager's meeting next month. I wanted to pin Krivsky down on what remaining free agents the Reds had interest in acquiring. I was unsuccessful, as I am only pretending to write a newspaper article and no one of consequence with the Reds would take my phone calls or answer my email. Even John Allen is avoiding contact.
Common sense would dictate the Reds would try to acquire young-ish ballplayers with the potential to improve("RISKS") or grizzled, veteran ballplayers with presence and declining statistics("BASEBALL GUYS"). Some RISKS include P Vicente Padilla, P Ted Lilly, and P Tony Armas. Just about everyone else who filed for free agency is a BASEBALL GUY.
It has been stated that some areas of the scouting inner circle has privately expoused the need for submariners and knuckleballers. This is an intriguing option, as most major league hitters rarely face either a submariner or a knuckleballer. The scouts believe the influx of SUB/KNUX will greatly reduce the home run percentage of the opposition at GABP.
I could be wrong, however, and the Reds could make no moves. Then again they could sign three name BASEBALL GUYS by mid-December, if Krivsky and Castellini have anything to do with it.
by ohiobobcat on Nov 29, 2006 2:46 PM EST reply actions
excellent
by JCH888 on Nov 29, 2006 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
Alex Gonzalez
It's True
by sweaver on Nov 29, 2006 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
I have to Agree
by RedsFanJoe on Dec 1, 2006 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
Castro vs Gonzalez
http://www.redreporter.com/comments/2006/11/21/10617/788/21#21
Basically most of the fielding metrics show Gonzalez to be significantly better with the glove. Chris Dial had him at 14 Runs Saved/150 games--second in the AL last year. The only advanced fielding metric that doesn't like Gonzalez is John Dewan's and he admits Agon is a good defender. Castro on the other hand is rated -6 runs by UZR. I have no trouble believing that given that he was 34 years old last year and he didn't look like the Castro of yesteryear.
While they're both poor hitters, Gonzalez is significantly better. His OPS+ the past four years were 77, 85, 79, 100. Castro's were 61, 74, 74, 75.
Most damning of all: Castro has played 12 seasons and has never accumulated more than 320 plate appearances--not because he was constantly injured, but because no on has ever deemed him worthy. I think it would be a big mistake for the Reds to decide that at age 35 he's finally a starter.
I don't think the Reds have little respect for Castro. I think they love him, more than most teams.
John Fay
by TR on Nov 29, 2006 6:39 PM EST reply actions
Fay
Would it kill a Reds beat writer to inquire about who the Reds are trying to sign from sources other than "Johnny Tightlips" Krivsky? And if the Reds aren't going to make any significant moves would it kill him to write an article asking why not? Castellini talked about winning now and winning long term when he bought the team, but how many moves can you point to where's he done that? Maybe instead of Fay speculating about how the Reds aren't going to spend much money maybe he could ask questions to find out why? Is it to much to ask for a reporter to investigate and ask tough questions? In case John Fay can't think of any here's one I've always had. Why is it that the Reds (Linder era to present) have always used the excuse that the market is too small to generate a competitive payroll yet they are w/in driving distance of Indianapolis (supports 2 pro franchises) and Columbus (supports NHL team) as well as Dayton, OH, Louisville and Lexington. That's a pretty significant base that could be drawn from, yet to hear everyone talk the Reds play in Mayberry.
Sorry to have gone on a long rant about payroll, but I've never seen one article where a Reds writer tackled the subject and for some reason I always thought reporters were supposed to ask tough questions.
But I digress...
by JCH888 on Nov 30, 2006 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
Anyone here...
It would be cool to gather at BW3's for game threads...
by chandrathan on Nov 29, 2006 8:16 PM EST reply actions
Palatial estate
by fletch @ Red Reporter on Nov 29, 2006 9:05 PM EST up reply actions
Newspapers
by neckbeard on Nov 30, 2006 8:43 AM EST reply actions
Actually...
The Enquirer has run stories by John Fay that were mostly made-up facts and speculation.
The NY Times has run stories by Jayson Blair that were entirely made-up facts and speculation.
by Paul Householder on Nov 30, 2006 9:06 AM EST up reply actions
One bad writer in
by neckbeard on Nov 30, 2006 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Made me think of something...
"This paper contains facts. And this paper has the eighth highest circulation in the whole wide world. Right? Plenty of facts. "Pregnant man gives birth." That's a fact."
i rented the documentary on that from Blockbuster
by ohiobobcat on Nov 30, 2006 12:21 PM EST up reply actions
well
It's true. Just ask George Will.
I'm not convinced
Having spent 20 years in sports writing, cop reporting and general assignment, among other things, including covering the Reds, I've experienced quite a bit.
By the way, writers almost never write their own headlines and layout often dictates what headlines say.
Too often, fans call up screaming/asking why there has been no story about this particular rumor or that particular rumor. Usually, the reporter has checked out said rumor and found there is absolutely nothing to it. Write a story about each rumor and there will be no place for real news.
As in any business, you have people who are very good and people who aren't. Sometimes you have editors who assigned ridiculous stories that make the writer look like a goof. Sometimes you have a company that owns a newspaper and that company has absurd policies that keep writers busy doing nonsensical things rather than their job.
Journalism is an interesting business, particularly sports writing. It's hard to beat getting paid to watch ball games. I thoroughly enjoyed it, although I like what I'm doing now even more.
by Thundering Turtle on Nov 30, 2006 7:36 PM EST reply actions

by 



















