Kenny Rodgers's Mystery Goo
As many of you know, that beautiful human being Kenny Rodgers was approached by the umpires after the first inning of Sunday's game because he was carrying a certain substance on his pitching hand. The umps simply asked Rodgers to wipe the substance from his hand, and MLB has since reported that it was a "clump of dirt," of which Rodgers wasn't aware.
It should be noted, of course, that Rodgers went on to pitch seven shutout frames after the substance was wiped. Using this as a reason, MLB has downplayed the whole event (giving it, I might add, the same treatment they give to all scandals, eg steroids).

Here's why I think Rodgers is full of crap:
The substance is rather glossy in this photo; I have never known infield dirt, or any other dirt, to be glossy like this. Rather, I would expect a "clump of dirt" to be matte.
Pitchers are notoriously meticulous in protecting and caring for their pitching arms and hands off the field, and I find it rather unlikely that such a sizeable amount of goo on his pitching hand would go unnoticed.
A less-valid reason, simply because of the mouth which uttered it, is that LaRussa reported that several of his batters told him the ball was moving strangely prior to the umpires inspecting Rodgers's hand.
The final reason is that, from all accounts I've received, Kenny Rodgers is a wretched human being.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Chocolate Cake..
Umm.. Yeah.. Sure it was.. He was saving it for later when he was hungry so he could have it with his Roasters....
I'm glad you included fecal matter
Cheating or no cheating, Rogers was definitely on last night. It has been pointed out too that the Cardinals had the most success off of him in the first inning, while he still had the mystery spot. Maybe he should have been tossed, but he wasn't (and LaRussa and the umps both had ample time to challenge/eject him), so I'm satisfied with the outcome of the proceedings. Especially since the Cardinals lost. Which they would have, goop or no goop. Now, if Todd Jones gets a 1-2-3 inning, I would say that his hands should be checked...
the EPSN frontpate
The mystery is why Larussa didn't make a bigger deal about it and possibly get Rogers ejected. I've heard several theories:
*Larussa was biding his time but the Fox cameras blew it before he was ready. Similarly Billy Martin waited for months before pointing out the pine tar on George Brett's bat after his home run.
*Mind games--Larussa didn't want to make too big a deal out of it because it would get into his players' heads. In retrospect he should have pushed for the ejection.
*TLR didn't want to show up his best buddy Jim Leyland.
*A Cardinal pitcher is also up to no good, so TLR didn't play that hand.
*TLR won a World Series with Mark McGwire and Jose Canseco. Who is he to call someone on cheating?
Lefty's got nothing to do with it!
Molasses!
He is a cheat
He is a jerk
Therefore I want the Tigers to win because I despise the Cardinals.
Thank God for Socrates because that's some damn good logic I'm working!
by NYRed on Oct 23, 2006 3:52 PM EDT reply actions
Coolest theory so far
That
Question
Oh, but you're soooo wrong!
I love this Cards fan at BYB:
" i was wondering how a washed up mediocre pitcher suddenlly turned into cyyoung??? how must it feel for him to have the whole nation know that hes a cheat?? damn is winning that important you gotta cheat?? i guess and he got away with it oh well"
If it was in all caps, I'd have thought BShaky became a fan of St.L. Besides, he forgot to mention that Polanco was blatantly in violation of the "no ninja hood" regulation. His XL nog and temples had to have been warmer than veryone else's, thus and unfair advantage I think.
the truth
by ohiobobcat on Oct 23, 2006 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions
In other news

I think he looks kinda
am i the only one
he's one of my new favorite non-reds.
Next time
Seriously
DET bats
by ohiobobcat on Oct 23, 2006 9:59 PM EDT reply actions
do you buy everything you see on tv, too?
where is scooter?
;)
All sensationalism aside...
- Kenny Rodgers is still a douche, and
- What, in your opinion, was the substance then?

by 




















